Highway MPG
I get around the same mpg in my 350z, although I have no cruise gotta be delicate with the throttle.
I can sometimes get around 33mpg with the a/c off and going right at 60.
aem intake, skunk2 spacer, hks exhaust, under drive pulleys
I can sometimes get around 33mpg with the a/c off and going right at 60.
aem intake, skunk2 spacer, hks exhaust, under drive pulleys
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 42,753
Likes: 11
From: Tucson, AZ
Trending Topics
I have a roadster so it’s a little less aero than the coupes, but sometimes I can match that mileage at that speed. One thing though, I disagree with the consensus that use of the cruise control aids gas mileage.
At one time the surface of the earth was all jagged ridges and deep valleys; with eons of erosion, these have become the rolling hills crossed by the highways and byways of America. (Even relatively flat areas still bear some remnants of these prehistoric protuberances) I have a good sense for the way my engine labors up and races down these hills. When going for best MPG on a mostly empty road, I let the speed effortlessly increase on the downhill in order to maximize momentum for the ensuing uphill. Approaching the crest of the uphill, I hold the throttle steady to the point of even dropping a bit under the speed limit knowing the car will soon regain speed on the downhill.
Contrast this to the dimwitted cc that will cut speed instantly on the down slope and quickly bury the throttle on the upslope to slavishly adhere to some arbitrary set speed.
Even with the odd lapse of concentration, I feel I have better throttle control than the average cruise.
At one time the surface of the earth was all jagged ridges and deep valleys; with eons of erosion, these have become the rolling hills crossed by the highways and byways of America. (Even relatively flat areas still bear some remnants of these prehistoric protuberances) I have a good sense for the way my engine labors up and races down these hills. When going for best MPG on a mostly empty road, I let the speed effortlessly increase on the downhill in order to maximize momentum for the ensuing uphill. Approaching the crest of the uphill, I hold the throttle steady to the point of even dropping a bit under the speed limit knowing the car will soon regain speed on the downhill.
Contrast this to the dimwitted cc that will cut speed instantly on the down slope and quickly bury the throttle on the upslope to slavishly adhere to some arbitrary set speed.
Even with the odd lapse of concentration, I feel I have better throttle control than the average cruise.
So that combined with any stop lights 21 isn't bad.
also, cruise control destroys gas mileage. Cruise control sets a constant speed, not constant TPS. One of the keys to great gas mileage is constant TPS. that's what we use for hypermiling. If you come upon a hill at 70mph the cruise control wants to keep 70mph so it will slam down the pedal and eat tons of gas trying to accelerate going upa hill. Acceleration up a hill eats fuel fast.
Sounds odd. I get 30-34 on the highway at 60-70ish in my DE with > 100k miles. Between 75-80 it starts to drop back down but wouldn't be anywhere near 21 even at that speed (strictly highway driving). Is 21 by computer calculation or by manual fuel consumption/mileage?
Sounds odd. I get 30-34 on the highway at 60-70ish in my DE with > 100k miles. Between 75-80 it starts to drop back down but wouldn't be anywhere near 21 even at that speed (strictly highway driving). Is 21 by computer calculation or by manual fuel consumption/mileage?
That's what I thought...
Manual calculation at the pump after I fill up.
Sounds odd. I get 30-34 on the highway at 60-70ish in my DE with > 100k miles. Between 75-80 it starts to drop back down but wouldn't be anywhere near 21 even at that speed (strictly highway driving). Is 21 by computer calculation or by manual fuel consumption/mileage?
Don't really know why it varies so much but my buddy who drives an '08 was shocked when I told him.










