Notices
Audio & Video 350Z Mobile entertainment and other electronics

1-12" Sub or 2-10" Subs?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-20-2006, 08:48 AM
  #21  
2fast4thelaw
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
2fast4thelaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Colorado
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Hot Cu
I am debating between the two Zenclosures for under the strut bar and was wondering what would be better to do, 1-12" sub or 2-10" subs? Which setup do people usually get and what provides the best bass? Also what channel amp did you use and with what wattage (Brand name and types would be very helpful)?

Thanks

If you after the best sound quality and use a Zenclosure(Which I highly Recommend) Do a single 10" sub. Mono subs always sound better than multiples. When you double up subs you also double up thier distortion. All subwoofers have distortion, some less than others. Low distortion subs are very expensive so in my opinion buy 1 really good low distortion 10" sub instead of (2) cheaper subs for SQ. Brands that fit this profile, Focal, Image Dynamics, Dayton Reference High Fidelity, DLS, Diamond Audio, ect. (Power range 250WRMS to 500WRMS no real need for more)

If SPL is what you after, then throw what I said above out the window and get a pair of 10's with massive x-max excursion and power them with 1000 plus watts. This is however not for my tastes, but hey, to each is own.
Brands for this application, JL Audio, Alpine, Fosgate, ect. (Power range 500WRMS to 1000WRMS not practical to exceed this)
Old 09-20-2006, 08:52 AM
  #22  
JimRHIT
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
JimRHIT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Hermosa Beach, CA
Posts: 4,416
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 2fast4thelaw
If you after the best sound quality

Do a single 10" sub. Mono subs always sound better than multiples. When you double up subs you also double up thier distortion.

You couldn't be more wrong. You will in fact cut the distortion in HALF ... fact is, to gain the same SPL from a pair, you will be doing half of the mechanical work (ie - cone movement) therefore minimizing distortion.

You other statements about the better sub costing more and spending the money there are dead on, but the above quote is just plain wrong. Please be sure of things like that before you post them.
Old 09-20-2006, 11:37 AM
  #23  
2fast4thelaw
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
2fast4thelaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Colorado
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Please, don't take this the wrong way but I am not wrong. When you power two subs on the same amp you are working your amp twice as hard. You are not halving mechanical movemont unless the subs are wired in series. You are also creating two sets of conflicting standing waves and sub harmonics. You are moving twice as much air in theory so higher volume is percieved. Higher volume is often percieved to the uneducated ear as better sound quality. The art of achiving true SQ is to no be able to percieve or localize the subwoofer.

Last edited by 2fast4thelaw; 09-20-2006 at 11:59 AM.
Old 09-20-2006, 12:09 PM
  #24  
JimRHIT
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
JimRHIT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Hermosa Beach, CA
Posts: 4,416
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

You are wrong and your excessive use of large words doesn't overcome that.

To create a given SPL from a transducer you need to move a certain amount of air. To create that same SPL from a surface area twice as large, you need to move half that amount.

Sub-harmonics? The main distortions you will hear from these subwoofers are second and third order ... creating a percieved loudness, not a subharmonic.
Old 09-21-2006, 07:46 AM
  #25  
2fast4thelaw
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
2fast4thelaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Colorado
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Dude, Sub-harmonic frequencies are 2nd and 3rd order frequencies. The fundamental frequency using an oscillator in a ratio of 1/x. For example, using an oscillator we will start at 80 Hz, sub-harmonics include 40 Hz (1/2) and 20 Hz (1/4) and so on.

You know they conceal information like this in books

Last edited by 2fast4thelaw; 09-21-2006 at 07:52 AM.
Old 09-21-2006, 08:00 AM
  #26  
JimRHIT
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
JimRHIT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Hermosa Beach, CA
Posts: 4,416
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Any Retard's Textbook
If our fundamental is an 80Hz tone.
The second harmonic will be double the fundamental tone. Answer: 2*80 = 160Hz
The third harmonic distortion will triple the fundamental tone. Answer: 3*80Hz = 240Hz
Now ...Can you please stop giving people advice, and/or arguing about something you don't know.
Old 09-21-2006, 08:49 AM
  #27  
MIAPLAYA
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
MIAPLAYA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Escondido
Posts: 11,373
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JimRHIT
Now ...Can you please stop giving people advice, and/or arguing about something you don't know.
I thought we had established that you knew what you were talking about. Guess not everyone got that memo...
Old 09-21-2006, 08:52 AM
  #28  
2fast4thelaw
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
2fast4thelaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Colorado
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Whatever dude! This discussion is now pointless and off the topic.
Old 09-21-2006, 08:54 AM
  #29  
JimRHIT
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
JimRHIT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Hermosa Beach, CA
Posts: 4,416
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

No .. I am making an example of you .. coming here with an assumed knowledge ... yet all you do is MIS-inform others. Please .. understand what I wrote was to be helpful ... and prove you wrong. If you want to come here and give advice acting like you know what you are talking about.... well .. at least learn some things from those of us that do first.
Old 09-21-2006, 08:56 AM
  #30  
JimRHIT
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
JimRHIT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Hermosa Beach, CA
Posts: 4,416
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

We are not beating a dead horse either (I resent that) .. I am showing you how you were wrong. This should be helpful to both you, and anyone that reads this thread.

Threads like these are the ones that people learn from, regardless of whether we stay on topic or not.
Old 09-21-2006, 09:37 AM
  #31  
2fast4thelaw
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
2fast4thelaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Colorado
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JimRHIT
No .. I am making an example of you .. coming here with an assumed knowledge ... yet all you do is MIS-inform others... I am showing you how you were wrong. This should be helpful to both you, and anyone that reads this thread.
First off, you are incredibly arrogant for making the above statement.

It is you who is mis-informing everyone. Prime example! "subharmonic" key word here "SUB" Means Below, not above 80hz!

Anyway, our arguing who's wrong and who's right is not helping anyone so stop trying to undermine my knowledge. It is very arrogant of you to presume you know more than I do when you have no ideal who you are talking to.

Last edited by 2fast4thelaw; 09-21-2006 at 09:50 AM.
Old 09-21-2006, 09:40 AM
  #32  
JimRHIT
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
JimRHIT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Hermosa Beach, CA
Posts: 4,416
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Arrogant .. confident .. meh

And AGAIN .. the distortions you deal with in subwoofers are NOT subharmonics .. they are second and third order (mostly).
Old 09-21-2006, 01:29 PM
  #33  
VO...
Administrator
iTrader: (25)
 
VO...'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Down Under & Dirty
Posts: 58,609
Received 2,747 Likes on 1,836 Posts
Default

(grabs popcorn)
Old 09-21-2006, 01:38 PM
  #34  
perrogrande007
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
perrogrande007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

fight fight fight!!!
Old 09-21-2006, 01:39 PM
  #35  
JimRHIT
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
JimRHIT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Hermosa Beach, CA
Posts: 4,416
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Who am I talking to? What do you do? Please .. impress me
Old 09-21-2006, 02:19 PM
  #36  
ZedNewbie
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
ZedNewbie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 603
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

*cricket noise*
Old 09-21-2006, 03:51 PM
  #37  
MIAPLAYA
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
MIAPLAYA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Escondido
Posts: 11,373
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 2fast4thelaw
First off, you are incredibly arrogant for making the above statement.

It is you who is mis-informing everyone. Prime example! "subharmonic" key word here "SUB" Means Below, not above 80hz!

Anyway, our arguing who's wrong and who's right is not helping anyone so stop trying to undermine my knowledge. It is very arrogant of you to presume you know more than I do when you have no ideal who you are talking to.
Not to fan the flames but I don't see where he posted the 80hz waves were subharmonic. Rather he posted that distortion of an 80hz wave is a 2nd or 3rd order. He even questioned the word subharmonic in your post. Then again I know far less then Jim as he well knows.
Old 09-21-2006, 04:01 PM
  #38  
JimRHIT
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
JimRHIT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Hermosa Beach, CA
Posts: 4,416
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I clarified to others the benefit of two transducers of a giver surface area vs one (after he misinformed us about the distortions from a pair)

I stated that there are no subharmonics, only harmonics (in order to clarify the misinformation in his post)

Then I clarified to him what 2nd and 3rd order distortions are (after he incorrectly claimed they were subharmonics)

I don't see where I mis-informed ... but if I did .. I'd like to know.
Old 09-22-2006, 04:25 AM
  #39  
perrogrande007
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
perrogrande007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

With two drivers you need much less power to do the same amount of work. As long as you push the drivers to their RMS with clean power, how much distortion could you possibly have, considering that you tune the system correctly? There's always going to be distortion in any system, but that doesn't mean that it will be audible, am I correct?
Old 09-22-2006, 05:19 AM
  #40  
limeg35
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
limeg35's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: bay area CA
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

So, whats the conclusion here? is 1 sub better than 2 or 2 is better than 1 for SQ's? does sub frequencies plays in part of SQ judging?


Quick Reply: 1-12" Sub or 2-10" Subs?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:53 PM.