Hankook AutoX R-comps!!!!!!!!!!!!
#21
Registered User
iTrader: (32)
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: dartmouth
Posts: 3,148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by z-u-later
Can you give me facts stating that going with a 40 series vs 35 series seriously affects performance? I sure would like to know from a pro racer like you.
Hey that was a nice stab at me. You must be a pretty funny guy! I believe you got most of the answers you needed though so Im all done here.
First350, thanks again for that fuel tap, and good luck this season with the new tires.
#22
Banned
iTrader: (218)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 4,874
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Very nice Peter...I'll have to check these out some time. I'm running the same size in the Avon R-comps, and once I kill the tires this year, will be in the market for something new...
#23
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Severn, ProMD
Posts: 617
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by z-u-later
Hey Tony, I thought about that but can you put 265s on the 18x8 front Track rims I'm buying from you? I know it'll fit on the 18x8.5 rears but not sure about the 18x8. Although I have seen 275s on 17x8s before . . .
#24
Registered User
iTrader: (43)
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Lone Star State
Posts: 2,757
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Kirkster
I am running 285 / 30 /18s all the way around on my track rims...
#25
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2004
Location: richmond virginia
Posts: 1,121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
no stats needed. we are telling you what we all have learned through experience and through rational judgement. like many have said, the effective gearing on your car will cause it to be a bit slower than the 285 18 como, a 275 18 combo, and even a 245 18 combo in relation to how fast it accelerates. i would consider ullose's opinion to be one of the best out there, he is not a national champion for no reason. also, having multiple people who have been racing for quite a while also believe this should be more than enough reason to take this to heart.
Last edited by jun14scr; 02-12-2007 at 05:12 AM.
#26
Registered User
iTrader: (27)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 1,614
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by z-u-later
Hey Tony, I thought about that but can you put 265s on the 18x8 front Track rims I'm buying from you? I know it'll fit on the 18x8.5 rears but not sure about the 18x8. Although I have seen 275s on 17x8s before . . .
#29
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (24)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: NewCastle, WA
Posts: 2,947
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
automatically defaulting to the lowest raidus Wheel/tire combination is not the reaon why a 30/35 is better than a 40 series tire...while going to a smaller radius wil help with acceleration, there's a reason why everyone is not on go-kart wheels for auto-X - we'd be in 6th gear!
IMO, tire profile is more of a function for suspension/handleing. Rim width/radius is performance/gearing (even though the profile is included in the total radius)
-peter
*Hoosier's and Kuhmo's autoX tires are both 275/40/17...does anyone know why they don't go with a 30/35 series?
IMO, tire profile is more of a function for suspension/handleing. Rim width/radius is performance/gearing (even though the profile is included in the total radius)
-peter
*Hoosier's and Kuhmo's autoX tires are both 275/40/17...does anyone know why they don't go with a 30/35 series?
Last edited by first350; 02-12-2007 at 01:52 PM.
#30
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Orange County
Posts: 330
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by first350
automatically defaulting to the lowest raidus Wheel/tire combination is not the reaon why a 30/35 is better than a 40 series tire...while going to a smaller radius wil help with acceleration, there's a reason why everyone is not on go-kart wheels for auto-X - we'd be in 6th gear!
IMO, tire profile is more of a function for suspension/handleing. Rim width/radius is performance/gearing (even though the profile is included in the total radius)
-peter
*Hoosier's and Kuhmo's autoX tires are both 275/40/17...does anyone know why they don't go with a 30/35 series?
IMO, tire profile is more of a function for suspension/handleing. Rim width/radius is performance/gearing (even though the profile is included in the total radius)
-peter
*Hoosier's and Kuhmo's autoX tires are both 275/40/17...does anyone know why they don't go with a 30/35 series?
For instance in SCCA club racing the GCR list a spec tire size for most SS and Touring class cars. The GCR also allows most cars to vary by 20mm in width and 10% aspect ratio.
So if the GCR specs your car with a 275-40-17 you could run a 295-255mm width and 30-50 aspect ratio. Road racers use more tires in a weekend than autocrossers do all year so they tend to drive the sizes.
In autocross stock class the only rule we have is whatever size DOT tire we can cram on a stock size wheel. So most of the time you will see people going for the widest shortest tire possible.
btw Hoosier and Kumho both make a 295-17 as well.
#31
350Z-holic
iTrader: (26)
Originally Posted by first350
automatically defaulting to the lowest raidus Wheel/tire combination is not the reaon why a 30/35 is better than a 40 series tire...while going to a smaller radius wil help with acceleration, there's a reason why everyone is not on go-kart wheels for auto-X - we'd be in 6th gear!
IMO, tire profile is more of a function for suspension/handleing. Rim width/radius is performance/gearing (even though the profile is included in the total radius)
IMO, tire profile is more of a function for suspension/handleing. Rim width/radius is performance/gearing (even though the profile is included in the total radius)
My autocross tires (265/35/18) are 1.3" in diameter smaller than my stock ones were. The acceleration difference is very noticeable. It's somewhat harder to measure the handling improvement as it's an apples-to-oranges comparison. I picked the 265 over the 275 (Falkens) because they had the same tread width but the 265's have reinforced sidewalls and the 275's don't. That helps with handling but again, I have no direct way to measure it or feel it.
#32
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (24)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: NewCastle, WA
Posts: 2,947
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by DavesZ#3
I agree with you that handling is an important consideration when picking profile, that's one of the reasons I went as low as I could. Obviously you don't want to go so small as to need to shift beyond 2nd gear. In the 2½ years I've been autocrossing the Z, I have hit the rev limiter just but a few times in 2nd. On stock tires, that's around 60mph. Since we rarely have courses that allow speeds that high, I figured a shorter tire would allow me to get closer to the limiter in the 50mph range that we typically max out at.
My autocross tires (265/35/18) are 1.3" in diameter smaller than my stock ones were. The acceleration difference is very noticeable. It's somewhat harder to measure the handling improvement as it's an apples-to-oranges comparison. I picked the 265 over the 275 (Falkens) because they had the same tread width but the 265's have reinforced sidewalls and the 275's don't. That helps with handling but again, I have no direct way to measure it or feel it.
My autocross tires (265/35/18) are 1.3" in diameter smaller than my stock ones were. The acceleration difference is very noticeable. It's somewhat harder to measure the handling improvement as it's an apples-to-oranges comparison. I picked the 265 over the 275 (Falkens) because they had the same tread width but the 265's have reinforced sidewalls and the 275's don't. That helps with handling but again, I have no direct way to measure it or feel it.
-Peter
***I just got the tires mounted tonight...is there a set way to break in AutoX tires? I know you can get tires that have gone through heat cycles...should I try something like that before taking them AutoXing?
#33
Registered User
iTrader: (19)
Originally Posted by z-u-later
Yeah, yeah, don't state the obvious . . . I'm well aware what you posted. Tell me some hard facts, like "Well, I know for a fact that we have more National Champions driving on 35 series tires than 40 series tires." And like another poster stated, if 35 series is faster than 40 series, why not go one step better and get 30 series tires, so you can go even faster. Which is the same argument on going with 17s vs 18s.
OP, I guess based on the "expert" opinion here, you should have bought 35 series tires since they're faster than the 40 series tires you just bought.
OP, I guess based on the "expert" opinion here, you should have bought 35 series tires since they're faster than the 40 series tires you just bought.
#34
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2004
Location: richmond virginia
Posts: 1,121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Fluid1
There is a give and take for every tire size. If only one tire performed better than the rest, it would be the onlyone selling. As ULLLOSE said, you can argue all you want about those tires, but they likely won't win you Nationals. If you're not after the Nat'l title, you will have a great time autoxing on them locally.
so.. when can i see those wheels fluid!
#35
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Severn, ProMD
Posts: 617
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by DavesZ#3
In the 2½ years I've been autocrossing the Z, I have hit the rev limiter just but a few times in 2nd.
I am running Hoosier A6 tires to answer the tire brand question.
#37
Registered User
iTrader: (43)
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Lone Star State
Posts: 2,757
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Below are the Falken Azenis RT-615 specs. I looked at the 18" tires closely and noticed that the 265/35/18 clearly stands out as the best choice for performance. The RPM alone @ 852 blows the other sizes away. It also has a nice thread width (10.0) and is reinforced. It only weighs 28.7 lbs since the OD is only 25.4.
http://www.falkentire.com/rt615_sizes.html
http://www.falkentire.com/rt615_sizes.html
Last edited by z-u-later; 02-13-2007 at 06:03 AM.
#38
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
One thing to keep in mind when discussing handling and tire sidewall height is compliance. A tire is a spring just like a coil spring. Being a spring, a tire has a spring rate that comes from the air pressure and sidewall stiffness - with most coming from the air pressure. Typical tire spring "rates" are around 1,200 to 1,500 lb. in.
A siffer sidewall reduces how responsive the tire is to small bumps that are not big enough to move the suspension due to friction and inertia in the suspension itself. Taken to an extreme with very short sidewalls and high air pressures a tire stops gripping as it should and becomes skatey. It feels responsive but ultimate grip is reduced. Once way race engineers reduce this effect is to reduce friction and intertia in the suspension itself with the most effective methods being unsprung weight reduction and high dollar, multi-adjustable shocks.
A siffer sidewall reduces how responsive the tire is to small bumps that are not big enough to move the suspension due to friction and inertia in the suspension itself. Taken to an extreme with very short sidewalls and high air pressures a tire stops gripping as it should and becomes skatey. It feels responsive but ultimate grip is reduced. Once way race engineers reduce this effect is to reduce friction and intertia in the suspension itself with the most effective methods being unsprung weight reduction and high dollar, multi-adjustable shocks.
#39
350Z-holic
iTrader: (26)
Originally Posted by z-u-later
Below are the Falken Azenis RT-615 specs. I looked at the 18" tires closely and noticed that the 265/35/18 clearly stands out as the best choice for performance. The RPM alone @ 852 blows the other sizes away. It also has a nice thread width (10.0) and is reinforced. It only weighs 28.7 lbs since the OD is only 25.4.
http://www.falkentire.com/rt615_sizes.html
http://www.falkentire.com/rt615_sizes.html
#40
Registered User
iTrader: (43)
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Lone Star State
Posts: 2,757
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by betamotorsports
One thing to keep in mind when discussing handling and tire sidewall height is compliance. A tire is a spring just like a coil spring. Being a spring, a tire has a spring rate that comes from the air pressure and sidewall stiffness - with most coming from the air pressure. Typical tire spring "rates" are around 1,200 to 1,500 lb. in.
A siffer sidewall reduces how responsive the tire is to small bumps that are not big enough to move the suspension due to friction and inertia in the suspension itself. Taken to an extreme with very short sidewalls and high air pressures a tire stops gripping as it should and becomes skatey. It feels responsive but ultimate grip is reduced. Once way race engineers reduce this effect is to reduce friction and intertia in the suspension itself with the most effective methods being unsprung weight reduction and high dollar, multi-adjustable shocks.
A siffer sidewall reduces how responsive the tire is to small bumps that are not big enough to move the suspension due to friction and inertia in the suspension itself. Taken to an extreme with very short sidewalls and high air pressures a tire stops gripping as it should and becomes skatey. It feels responsive but ultimate grip is reduced. Once way race engineers reduce this effect is to reduce friction and intertia in the suspension itself with the most effective methods being unsprung weight reduction and high dollar, multi-adjustable shocks.