Recommend some Good R-Comps
#41
Originally Posted by Dave 90TT
So you think 265's on an 8.5" rim would be fine? I'd really like to stay with the same size tires front and rear, to try and prevent some of the understeer the G's have.
#42
No, can't fit 17". I'm thinking about getting new front wheels, in the same size and style as my rears, which are 18 x 9.5, and then I could fit 265's all around.
PS Don't have a Z32, but I used to. 425 rwhp, fun car. Didn't handle as well as my G does, though.
PS Don't have a Z32, but I used to. 425 rwhp, fun car. Didn't handle as well as my G does, though.
#44
#45
Originally Posted by Dave 90TT
my bad...i left out a major part.. 265/17
#48
Originally Posted by Dave 90TT
No, can't fit 17". I'm thinking about getting new front wheels, in the same size and style as my rears, which are 18 x 9.5, and then I could fit 265's all around.
PS Don't have a Z32, but I used to. 425 rwhp, fun car. Didn't handle as well as my G does, though.
PS Don't have a Z32, but I used to. 425 rwhp, fun car. Didn't handle as well as my G does, though.
Stock vs. stock, the G35/Z33 certainly outhandles a Z32. Our Z33 is bone stock minus Brembos and Hoosiers, and it's an absolute hoot on the road courses. My Z32 is all power, all 636rwhp of it, but I've only run it at about 475rwhp at the open tracks. Laguna Seca, at that power, really pushed my Stoptechs to the limit. All on 17x9.5" CCWs with 275 R5 Hoosiers all-around.
Your G35TT sounds like a hoot. Let us know what you end up with for a wheel/tire set-up, and how it feels once you hit the track.
#49
I think I've decided on the Toyo R888;s, 255/35 on my front 18x8.5 and 275/35 on the rear 18x9.5
Those wheel and tire sizes all fall within the acceptable range, according to Toyo's website, and they fit under my fenders, as well, no rubbing.
Next track weekend is in about a month, so I will give a decent review.
Those wheel and tire sizes all fall within the acceptable range, according to Toyo's website, and they fit under my fenders, as well, no rubbing.
Next track weekend is in about a month, so I will give a decent review.
#50
Originally Posted by Dave 90TT
I think I've decided on the Toyo R888;s, 255/35 on my front 18x8.5 and 275/35 on the rear 18x9.5
Those wheel and tire sizes all fall within the acceptable range, according to Toyo's website, and they fit under my fenders, as well, no rubbing.
Next track weekend is in about a month, so I will give a decent review.
Those wheel and tire sizes all fall within the acceptable range, according to Toyo's website, and they fit under my fenders, as well, no rubbing.
Next track weekend is in about a month, so I will give a decent review.
#51
Originally Posted by Dave 90TT
I think I've decided on the Toyo R888;s, 255/35 on my front 18x8.5 and 275/35 on the rear 18x9.5
Those wheel and tire sizes all fall within the acceptable range, according to Toyo's website, and they fit under my fenders, as well, no rubbing.
Next track weekend is in about a month, so I will give a decent review.
Those wheel and tire sizes all fall within the acceptable range, according to Toyo's website, and they fit under my fenders, as well, no rubbing.
Next track weekend is in about a month, so I will give a decent review.
I also agree that you have made a good choice.
#52
I used my Nitto NT-01's for the first time this weekend. They feel much like the RA-1's that I've been using for years but with a slightly stiffer sidewall. They seem to be a touch faster than the RA-1's but it's hard to tell since I did't get to run both tires on the same day under the same conditions. It's nice to have choices.
#53
Originally Posted by daveh
I used my Nitto NT-01's for the first time this weekend. They feel much like the RA-1's that I've been using for years but with a slightly stiffer sidewall. They seem to be a touch faster than the RA-1's but it's hard to tell since I did't get to run both tires on the same day under the same conditions. It's nice to have choices.
#54
Originally Posted by daveh
I used my Nitto NT-01's for the first time this weekend. They feel much like the RA-1's that I've been using for years but with a slightly stiffer sidewall. They seem to be a touch faster than the RA-1's but it's hard to tell since I did't get to run both tires on the same day under the same conditions. It's nice to have choices.
That's you right? I hope you don't mind me posting this up.
#55
I bought them full tread. At the depth they come at, there was no tread squirm like a full tread RA-1. There is probably no rain traction like a full RA-1 either though. If they continue to trend like an RA-1, they will get about a second faster per lap as they wear in. Since they don't need to be shaved, it's a $20 savings per tire too.
That picture is partially me.. It's my old wing that I sold off last year when I had to remove it per NASA TT rules. My car is the wingless identical twin.
That picture is partially me.. It's my old wing that I sold off last year when I had to remove it per NASA TT rules. My car is the wingless identical twin.
#56
Originally Posted by daveh
I bought them full tread. At the depth they come at, there was no tread squirm like a full tread RA-1. There is probably no rain traction like a full RA-1 either though. If they continue to trend like an RA-1, they will get about a second faster per lap as they wear in. Since they don't need to be shaved, it's a $20 savings per tire too.
That picture is partially me.. It's my old wing that I sold off last year when I had to remove it per NASA TT rules. My car is the wingless identical twin.
That picture is partially me.. It's my old wing that I sold off last year when I had to remove it per NASA TT rules. My car is the wingless identical twin.
what "hot" pressures were you running the NT01's at?
I'm using them for the first time in a couple of weeks and am curious.
Last edited by Axelerate; 02-13-2008 at 02:15 PM.
#59
Originally Posted by n1cK!
has anyone tried the falken azenis rt-615's? the website doesn't really give any good info other than it has a 200 UTQG rating.