Notices
Autocross/Road SCCA Solo II, SCCA Club Racing, Redline Track Events, Speed Trial, Speed Ventures, Grand-Am Cup, JGTC, Procar Australia

Sidewall size comparison

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 3, 2011 | 12:47 PM
  #1  
solidfish's Avatar
solidfish
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 576
Likes: 0
From: San Jose
Default Sidewall size comparison

Are there any benefits in running larger/smaller sidewalls? I have two sets of tires, 245/40 and 245/45, and wondering which to keep. I know the difference isnt much, and if anything, barely noticeable as the 45s fill up the wheel well more.
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2011 | 01:04 PM
  #2  
davidv's Avatar
davidv
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 42,753
Likes: 11
From: Tucson, AZ
Default

My bad. Did not notice this is the autocross forum.

Last edited by davidv; Nov 3, 2011 at 01:06 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2011 | 01:21 PM
  #3  
jnathan68's Avatar
jnathan68
Registered User
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 603
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
Default

Originally Posted by solidfish
Are there any benefits in running larger/smaller sidewalls? I have two sets of tires, 245/40 and 245/45, and wondering which to keep. I know the difference isnt much, and if anything, barely noticeable as the 45s fill up the wheel well more.
Comparing different sidewall "height" on the same brand of tire, the less sidewall, usually the less deflection in the tire in cornering...basically a stiffer sidewall feel for the 40 series vs. the 45 series. This can make for a rougher ride but better cornering.

Also, a lower profile tire has a smaller diameter and thus, when talking about drive wheel tires, it changes the gearing.

I would go with the lower profile tire
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2011 | 01:35 PM
  #4  
solidfish's Avatar
solidfish
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 576
Likes: 0
From: San Jose
Default

Originally Posted by jnathan68
Comparing different sidewall "height" on the same brand of tire, the less sidewall, usually the less deflection in the tire in cornering...basically a stiffer sidewall feel for the 40 series vs. the 45 series. This can make for a rougher ride but better cornering.

Also, a lower profile tire has a smaller diameter and thus, when talking about drive wheel tires, it changes the gearing.

I would go with the lower profile tire
Excellent, this is what I was looking for. I was thinking the lower profile would also help a bit with the reduced weight (as small as it may be).

Both tires are identical brand/model. Its the RE01s and they seem to have a fairly stiff sidewall, so I think I'll switch to the 40s.
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2011 | 01:58 PM
  #5  
JCITY's Avatar
JCITY
Banned
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 3,274
Likes: 1
From: GEORGIA
Default

I'm assuming you have 18" wheels?Keep in mind the correct diameter for your car.
The 45 series is the OEM size,the 40 series is still within the tolerance level and a bit lower profile.I sure would go with the 40 for the handling and the looks.Depending on the make of the tire,the ride difference should be minimal.
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2011 | 03:00 PM
  #6  
betamotorsports's Avatar
betamotorsports
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,393
Likes: 3
From: La Habra, CA, USA
Default

Lower sidewall height does not necessarily mean better handling. We got better lap times on high horsepower BMWs, Vipers, and 240Zs by running a taller sidewall height in back. That allowed the cars to put power down better and it was a bit easier for the driver to consistently turn faster laps. For the Solo2 FP national championship BMW going with a slick with a 2.5% taller sidewall pulled .1 seconds off course times.
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2011 | 04:07 PM
  #7  
jnathan68's Avatar
jnathan68
Registered User
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 603
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
Default

Originally Posted by betamotorsports
Lower sidewall height does not necessarily mean better handling. We got better lap times on high horsepower BMWs, Vipers, and 240Zs by running a taller sidewall height in back. That allowed the cars to put power down better and it was a bit easier for the driver to consistently turn faster laps. For the Solo2 FP national championship BMW going with a slick with a 2.5% taller sidewall pulled .1 seconds off course times.
So, for a amateur who doesn't have a lot of money to buy multiple sets of tires and do lots of back to back testing, is there a standard that can be applied...for example, lower sidewall in front and taller sidewall in the rear on a Z? Or, is it basically try and see which works best?
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2011 | 04:23 PM
  #8  
betamotorsports's Avatar
betamotorsports
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,393
Likes: 3
From: La Habra, CA, USA
Default

For most racers the 40 to 45 series difference we are talking about here would be unnoticeable. It comes into play at the upper levels of competition in your class or series. If you're a mid-pack competitor, work on your driving skills first.
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2011 | 04:37 PM
  #9  
solidfish's Avatar
solidfish
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 576
Likes: 0
From: San Jose
Default

Ya I figured 40 vs 45 would be negligible. Thanks for all the good info!
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2011 | 05:01 PM
  #10  
terrasmak's Avatar
terrasmak
Super Moderator
MY350Z.COM
Premier Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 29,114
Likes: 2,394
From: Sin City
Default

Run your 40's up front and the 45 in the back.
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2011 | 08:46 PM
  #11  
SE5spd's Avatar
SE5spd
Registered User
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 4,114
Likes: 0
From: around
Default

if its time for new tires just buy RS3s
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MicVelo
NorCal Marketplace
9
Oct 4, 2015 07:55 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:37 PM.