Notices
Autocross/Road SCCA Solo II, SCCA Club Racing, Redline Track Events, Speed Trial, Speed Ventures, Grand-Am Cup, JGTC, Procar Australia

Stagger tire sizes or not?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-15-2012, 08:13 PM
  #21  
03threefiftyz
350Z-holic
iTrader: (25)
 
03threefiftyz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Frederick, MD
Posts: 9,848
Received 117 Likes on 63 Posts
Default

-2.7
Old 01-15-2012, 08:14 PM
  #22  
03threefiftyz
350Z-holic
iTrader: (25)
 
03threefiftyz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Frederick, MD
Posts: 9,848
Received 117 Likes on 63 Posts
Default

I run an aggressive spring/shock combo along with a big front bar. My car doesn't move much.
Old 01-16-2012, 10:54 AM
  #23  
2TH PWR
New Member
iTrader: (21)
 
2TH PWR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 8,159
Received 107 Likes on 61 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by axial_pro
Exactly the response I was looking for. Thanks!

Orders well be placed tomorrow - can't wait for spring!
Will be fun trying to keep up to the beast.
Old 02-14-2012, 02:18 AM
  #24  
kevininpo
Registered User
 
kevininpo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I am considering a square setup as well. The charts I've seen say a 285 will fit a 9.5 in wheel (guidelines were 9.5 to 10.5 in wheel) My Z is pretty much 100% stock...will 285's fit without any issues?
Old 02-14-2012, 05:17 AM
  #25  
AznSky
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
 
AznSky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 1,972
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'm surprised everyone is going 285's with only a couple track days.

I've used my 265/265 setup for the past two years and have no complaints.

I'd think too massive of a tire will hide driving flaws just like a stickier tire would.
Old 02-14-2012, 05:20 AM
  #26  
2TH PWR
New Member
iTrader: (21)
 
2TH PWR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 8,159
Received 107 Likes on 61 Posts
Default

^ By that logic, why not drive on the stock 245 potenzas?
Old 02-14-2012, 06:36 AM
  #27  
sig11
New Member
iTrader: (3)
 
sig11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: detroit
Posts: 675
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AznSky
I'd think too massive of a tire will hide driving flaws just like a stickier tire would.
That's an interesting question... I think I have too wide a tire sometimes. :P
Old 02-14-2012, 06:44 AM
  #28  
AznSky
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
 
AznSky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 1,972
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 2TH PWR
^ By that logic, why not drive on the stock 245 potenzas?
I did for my first 4 HPDE's.

And I think fixxercask did as well (and he was still flying by others with grippier tires)
Old 02-14-2012, 06:59 AM
  #29  
mhoward1
350Z-holic
 
mhoward1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: NC
Posts: 14,502
Received 22 Likes on 20 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AznSky
I'm surprised everyone is going 285's with only a couple track days.

I've used my 265/265 setup for the past two years and have no complaints.

I'd think too massive of a tire will hide driving flaws just like a stickier tire would.
I agree with this statement. If you can learn chassis dynamics and car control with the OEM size tires you will be that much better when you are ready to move up. It's best to learn that on skinnier and non-R compounds.
Old 02-14-2012, 07:58 AM
  #30  
terrasmak
Super Moderator
MY350Z.COM
iTrader: (8)
 
terrasmak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Sin City
Posts: 28,656
Received 2,296 Likes on 1,653 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by kevininpo
I am considering a square setup as well. The charts I've seen say a 285 will fit a 9.5 in wheel (guidelines were 9.5 to 10.5 in wheel) My Z is pretty much 100% stock...will 285's fit without any issues?
285 rs3 runs wide, really wide. My sidewalls are dam near straight up and down on a 10.5 , search a little I believe pics are posted.
Old 02-14-2012, 08:52 AM
  #31  
jnathan68
Registered User
iTrader: (29)
 
jnathan68's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: San Diego
Posts: 603
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by kevininpo
I am considering a square setup as well. The charts I've seen say a 285 will fit a 9.5 in wheel (guidelines were 9.5 to 10.5 in wheel) My Z is pretty much 100% stock...will 285's fit without any issues?
Although a 285 will fit on a 9.5" rim, there have been a few tests lately showing that it is better to have the tire a bit stretched than a bit squished on the rim. On a 9.5" rim your lap times will probably be the same going with a 275 tire (or maybe even a 265 tire) as with a 285 tire since you will not be using the same amount of contact patch as you would with the 285's on a 10.5" rim.

Obviously, there are differences in tires (tread width, sidewall stiffness) that make this more or less pronounced but I would shoot for at least a 10" rim.
Old 02-14-2012, 10:51 AM
  #32  
ThreeFiveZero Z
Registered User
iTrader: (23)
 
ThreeFiveZero Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL
Posts: 705
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I am running a square 245 R6 on 9.5" wheels this year due to rule changes, so far so good! The turn in response is better from the 255s I used last season is better since they fit the rim different. They also feel like they dont scrub/push as bad in tight turns.

There is such thing as too much tire. I like to reference spec miatas in this case. A SM on 225s is slower than an equivalent car on 205s.

Last edited by ThreeFiveZero Z; 02-14-2012 at 10:58 AM.
Old 02-14-2012, 03:41 PM
  #33  
betamotorsports
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
betamotorsports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: La Habra, CA, USA
Posts: 1,393
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Also depends on the track. My 350Z was marginal faster around AutoClub Speedway on V710 245s then 285s, but the test wasn't on the same day so its just anecdotal. When you spend a lot of time at full throttle on a straight or in banking (20 seconds at the Speedway) narrow tires are better.
Old 02-14-2012, 07:14 PM
  #34  
s0s0sleepy
Registered User
 
s0s0sleepy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Azusa
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Im actually also in the market for 285s on a 18x10.5 wheel. Would they fit on basically stock suspension?
Old 02-14-2012, 07:22 PM
  #35  
Voboy
New Member
iTrader: (58)
 
Voboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 2,995
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

does everyone still run more front camber than rear even with the square setup? if so that's a big big big grip change in front, is the car neutral or slightly oversteering now?
what's the camber specs front and rear for those that are running square? thanks.
Old 02-15-2012, 06:58 AM
  #36  
betamotorsports
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
betamotorsports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: La Habra, CA, USA
Posts: 1,393
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Voboy
does everyone still run more front camber than rear even with the square setup? if so that's a big big big grip change in front, is the car neutral or slightly oversteering now?
The front needs all the help it can get and yes you'll want to run more static front negative camber. Even with a square setup the car still understeers. It undertsteers less, but the basic chassis still understeers at the limit.

Last edited by betamotorsports; 02-15-2012 at 07:00 AM.
Old 02-15-2012, 01:51 PM
  #37  
dnguyent
New Member
iTrader: (5)
 
dnguyent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 1,044
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by betamotorsports
The front needs all the help it can get and yes you'll want to run more static front negative camber. Even with a square setup the car still understeers. It undertsteers less, but the basic chassis still understeers at the limit.
That has been my observation... For a while, I thought my suspension setup was just way off because I've been complaining of general understeer with 275/275 setup while others have mention "oversteering monster". Mated with a Cusco diff, I don't get very much rotation unless I trail brake very aggressively (which I only do in sharp corners).
Old 02-15-2012, 03:18 PM
  #38  
betamotorsports
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
betamotorsports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: La Habra, CA, USA
Posts: 1,393
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dnguyent
That has been my observation... For a while, I thought my suspension setup was just way off because I've been complaining of general understeer with 275/275 setup while others have mention "oversteering monster". Mated with a Cusco diff, I don't get very much rotation unless I trail brake very aggressively (which I only do in sharp corners).
A lot of people confused lift throttle behavior with steady state behavior. When a car is decried as understeering or oversteering it means its behavior in a corner at a steady state (steady throttle, steady steering). A good handling car should step the back out under lift throttle. The more sensitive the suspension and car is to throttle the faster you can go around corners - assuming some driving skill.
Old 02-16-2012, 01:28 PM
  #39  
dnguyent
New Member
iTrader: (5)
 
dnguyent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 1,044
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by betamotorsports
A lot of people confused lift throttle behavior with steady state behavior. When a car is decried as understeering or oversteering it means its behavior in a corner at a steady state (steady throttle, steady steering). A good handling car should step the back out under lift throttle. The more sensitive the suspension and car is to throttle the faster you can go around corners - assuming some driving skill.
Under steady state throttle, my square tire setup does understeer. With the stock VLSD, my car was more sensitive to throttle lift. After the Cusco RS install, it wasn't as sensitive anymore. In fact, I'd say it's borderline numb. It's set up as a 1.5 way at 80% locking. I remember reading somewhere that these LSD's will add "stability" in turns while off throttle, thereby allowing more "confidence" under trail braking. When, I read that, I concluded that it meant the car does not rotate as well under throttle lift, and I must rely more on trail braking to get the car rotated.
Old 02-17-2012, 08:06 AM
  #40  
betamotorsports
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
betamotorsports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: La Habra, CA, USA
Posts: 1,393
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dnguyent
I remember reading somewhere that these LSD's will add "stability" in turns while off throttle, thereby allowing more "confidence" under trail braking. When, I read that, I concluded that it meant the car does not rotate as well under throttle lift, and I must rely more on trail braking to get the car rotated.
Any time you lock two wheels together you increase the tendency of the chassis to move in the direction those two wheels are pointing. Trying to change that direction becomes more difficult.



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:52 PM.