Notices
Brakes & Suspension 350Z stoppers, coils, shocks/dampers

NEW Stance SUS Coilover Review

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-02-2006, 10:22 AM
  #41  
anotheraznguy
Registered User
iTrader: (14)
 
anotheraznguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Tracy Ca
Posts: 1,963
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

correct!!!...
so stance is good but zeals are better..
but for the price u cant beat stance..
Old 06-02-2006, 11:20 AM
  #42  
350Zteve
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
350Zteve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: So. Cal.
Posts: 1,432
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

12/5 are the spring rates? Are you serious? That makes them 100% stiffer than stock in the front and 33% SOFTER than stock in the rear. That makes no sense. That would the ****tiest setup ever.
Old 06-02-2006, 02:57 PM
  #43  
JDMFairlady21
New Member
iTrader: (9)
 
JDMFairlady21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: LI, NY
Posts: 2,853
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

so wit that we keep the oem rear spring in place even afer the install of the coilovers right?
Old 06-02-2006, 03:03 PM
  #44  
350Zteve
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
350Zteve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: So. Cal.
Posts: 1,432
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JDMFairlady21
so wit that we keep the oem rear spring in place even afer the install of the coilovers right?
I sure hope not, then it would not be possible to adjust ride height in the rear.
Old 06-02-2006, 03:09 PM
  #45  
plastiketa
Registered User
iTrader: (14)
 
plastiketa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: The OC boyeee!!
Posts: 912
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

So the front are coilovers and the rear is setup like the OEM setup or true coilover?? A bit lost...
Old 06-03-2006, 08:09 AM
  #46  
Gsedan35
New Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Gsedan35's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Central California
Posts: 3,121
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by drumma022
They are only now offering the true coilover design for the rear. I believe the spring rates are now set to 12/5.

The Z coilovers come in a 14k/11k spring rates. Stance offers a true coilover design for the rear like the BuddyClub and other higher end coilovers. They also offer a more comfortable setup where it is a 11k front and a progressive 5k for the rear with an OEM spring perch design for the rear. We opted to test out the single type rear. Especially since the MSRP is $1295 and we're running a special on our website www.enjukuracing.com.
Pulled from the first page
Old 06-03-2006, 08:21 AM
  #47  
Gsedan35
New Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Gsedan35's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Central California
Posts: 3,121
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 350Zteve
I sure hope not, then it would not be possible to adjust ride height in the rear.

With either setup your going to be able to adjust rear ride height.

With the setup that has the rear spring in the oem position you'll get a height adjustment system to be used with the springs along with rear shocks that are adjustable for length. Shortening the rear dampners adjust's piston travel and set's rear spring preload (adjusts preload at least with the setup I have run).

With the setup having the rear springs on the dampners, adjusting the length of those dampners set's the rear ride height. Spring preload of course has nothing to do with height.
Old 06-03-2006, 09:53 AM
  #48  
drumma022
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
drumma022's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: ORL, FL
Posts: 550
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

12/5 are the spring rates? Are you serious? That makes them 100% stiffer than stock in the front and 33% SOFTER than stock in the rear. That makes no sense. That would the ****tiest setup ever ... I sure hope not, then it would not be possible to adjust ride height in the rear.

The springs rates have been scaled down to a 5K in the rear due to 2 reasons.

The spring is now on a different location to have a different overall effect on the suspension. This may seem like crappy spring rates as 350Zsteve has suggested, however in reality its is a very balanced setup. This was already proven by an alternate source (VRT) who has no incentive to give good or bad reviews on the coilovers.

The rear spring operates in conjunction with the coilover using a linear spring rather than a progressive spring like other setups. You are also able to preload the spring to allow for personal preference on the way the suspension is setup. Lastly, the dampening has an incredible effect on the way the car handles. You can have an 8k rear with crappy valving and a 5k rear with better dampening characteristics and the 5k will come out having an overall better feel.

Also, even though most coilovers require that you remove the factory springs in the rear, you can leave the spring there and it will compress to have an INCREDIBLY stiff spring. The new coilover will force the stock spring to compress but no system that I am aware of out there is designed to do this.
Old 06-03-2006, 10:26 AM
  #49  
WA2GOOD
Banned
iTrader: (24)
 
WA2GOOD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,474
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by drumma022
The springs rates have been scaled down to a 5K in the rear due to 2 reasons.

The spring is now on a different location to have a different overall effect on the suspension. This may seem like crappy spring rates as 350Zsteve has suggested, however in reality its is a very balanced setup. This was already proven by an alternate source (VRT) who has no incentive to give good or bad reviews on the coilovers.

The rear spring operates in conjunction with the coilover using a linear spring rather than a progressive spring like other setups. You are also able to preload the spring to allow for personal preference on the way the suspension is setup. Lastly, the dampening has an incredible effect on the way the car handles. You can have an 8k rear with crappy valving and a 5k rear with better dampening characteristics and the 5k will come out having an overall better feel.

Also, even though most coilovers require that you remove the factory springs in the rear, you can leave the spring there and it will compress to have an INCREDIBLY stiff spring. The new coilover will force the stock spring to compress but no system that I am aware of out there is designed to do this.
This is all true. Because the rear coilover (mainly the spring) is now placed out further (closer to the wheel) this in itself gives the torsional resistance of a spring, at the wheel more acurate controll over that of the stock location. IMO, (and severall other suspension specialists) it is almost always better and gives a more precise feel when you can move the springs and shocks further out (closer to the wheel). At least that is what I have learned from most of the chassis & suspension schools and classes that I have been to.
Old 06-03-2006, 10:27 AM
  #50  
350Zteve
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
350Zteve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: So. Cal.
Posts: 1,432
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Okay, I'm totally confused. Please clarify the following:

1. How many rear springs are there used per side? One or two?
2. If one, where is it? On the shock or in the stock location?
3. If two, is the stock spring retained or are there two after market springs?

I thought I read that the kit originally came as a coilover in the rear, but was later changed to a separate spring and damper setup like stock.
Old 06-03-2006, 10:39 AM
  #51  
drumma022
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
drumma022's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: ORL, FL
Posts: 550
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

1 - One per corner of the car.
2 - Spring is on the shock (eliminating the stock spring location).

Stance originally made 2 types. Stock type and true coilover type. Recently, they discontinued the stock type coilover, now ONLY making the true coilover type.
Attached Thumbnails NEW Stance SUS Coilover Review-stance17.jpg  
Old 06-03-2006, 11:15 AM
  #52  
jinsei888
New Member
iTrader: (14)
 
jinsei888's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: South San Francisco, CA
Posts: 4,262
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

i just had my stance installed, true coilover all around--NOT oem style in the rear--by Auto RnD last week and I've been dailying the Z with a 2" drop all around and it rides WAYYYY better than stock. Great service and great install and alignment and great coilovers! +1 ftw!
Old 06-03-2006, 12:19 PM
  #53  
WA2GOOD
Banned
iTrader: (24)
 
WA2GOOD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,474
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jinsei888
i just had my stance installed, true coilover all around--NOT oem style in the rear--by Auto RnD last week and I've been dailying the Z with a 2" drop all around and it rides WAYYYY better than stock. Great service and great install and alignment and great coilovers! +1 ftw!
Glad you are likeing them...not surprised at all. These coilovers are a great addition at a good price.
Old 06-03-2006, 01:15 PM
  #54  
350Zteve
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
350Zteve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: So. Cal.
Posts: 1,432
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by drumma022
1 - One per corner of the car.
2 - Spring is on the shock (eliminating the stock spring location).

Stance originally made 2 types. Stock type and true coilover type. Recently, they discontinued the stock type coilover, now ONLY making the true coilover type.
Okay, now it all makes sense. Thanks for clearing it up.
Old 06-04-2006, 10:24 AM
  #55  
__jb
Z + Rear Seat
iTrader: (3)
 
__jb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: St.Pete,FL
Posts: 1,642
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Is there any concern for supporting the static weight of the car on suspension pieces not designed for that purpose? (I mean by removing the OEM coil spring and installing true coil-overs.)

Anyone try these on a G35 yet?

Do these coil overs lessen the amout of clearance between the back side of the tire and the shock?

Last edited by __jb; 06-04-2006 at 10:29 AM.
Old 06-04-2006, 01:08 PM
  #56  
WA2GOOD
Banned
iTrader: (24)
 
WA2GOOD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,474
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by __jb
Is there any concern for supporting the static weight of the car on suspension pieces not designed for that purpose? (I mean by removing the OEM coil spring and installing true coil-overs.)
Good point, and I have found that the stock shock location is strong enough to support more than enough weight to sufice.

Originally Posted by __jb
Anyone try these on a G35 yet?
I am just about to....

Originally Posted by __jb
Do these coil overs lessen the amout of clearance between the back side of the tire and the shock?
Yes, as I mentioned in a previous post, these (rear) coilovers are a little larger diameter than just the shock alone. Yet, (much to my suprise) I was able to clear a 315/30/18 on the rear with a 9.5" wheel with a 30mm ofset. I would be surprised if anyone else ventures that wide too often on these cars.
Old 06-04-2006, 06:22 PM
  #57  
Amiricanmade
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Amiricanmade's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Southern Cal
Posts: 1,711
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yes, as I mentioned in a previous post, these (rear) coilovers are a little larger diameter than just the shock alone. Yet, (much to my suprise) I was able to clear a 315/30/18 on the rear with a 9.5" wheel with a 30mm ofset. I would be surprised if anyone else ventures that wide too often on these cars.[/QUOTE]

So if i had 19x10.5 with a 19 offset, do you think it would clear?
Old 06-05-2006, 01:30 AM
  #58  
WA2GOOD
Banned
iTrader: (24)
 
WA2GOOD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,474
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Amiricanmade
So if i had 19x10.5 with a 19 offset, do you think it would clear?
Yes, I believe it would.
Old 06-05-2006, 02:45 AM
  #59  
JDMFairlady21
New Member
iTrader: (9)
 
JDMFairlady21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: LI, NY
Posts: 2,853
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

1 last question- would it be okay/better to keep the oem spring @ the location after install or jst remove it?
Old 06-05-2006, 09:54 AM
  #60  
anotheraznguy
Registered User
iTrader: (14)
 
anotheraznguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Tracy Ca
Posts: 1,963
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

better to remove the oe spring...
besides you can now go with battle version camber toe and trac rods


Quick Reply: NEW Stance SUS Coilover Review



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:59 PM.