Notices
Brakes & Suspension 350Z stoppers, coils, shocks/dampers

corner balancing

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 10, 2007 | 05:51 PM
  #1  
bbs350z's Avatar
bbs350z
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (85)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,662
Likes: 2
From: Scottsdale AZ
Default corner balancing

how many of you buy fully adjustable coilovers and dont corner balance them? reason being because i am reading the latest issue of modified and there is a complete section on it. any of you that go roadracing, etc. adjust each corner differently, do you notice a significant difference?
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2007 | 05:15 AM
  #2  
Kolia's Avatar
Kolia
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,821
Likes: 3
From: Columbus, Ohio
Default

Corner balancing is the while point of getting a ride height adjustable suspension.

Not corner balancing after getting a coil over kit is a waste of a potentially great setup. Like getting really good set of tires and running them with 50 psi of pressure...
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2007 | 05:25 AM
  #3  
Q45tech's Avatar
Q45tech
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 984
Likes: 0
From: Marietta, Georgia
Default

Rather than artificially adjusting ride height why not first exactly balance the body weight with the designated driver in place.

Necessary to weigh the weight on each wheel.

Oem designs for a 155 pound driver, so excess will have to be trimmed away.

Last edited by Q45tech; Jun 11, 2007 at 10:34 AM.
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2007 | 09:30 AM
  #4  
HARRYPOTTER's Avatar
HARRYPOTTER
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,055
Likes: 0
From: Bronx N.Y.
Default

Corner balancing along with Tire temperature reading for camber adjustments are the best....atleast that's the route I go....
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2007 | 01:25 PM
  #5  
bbs350z's Avatar
bbs350z
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (85)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,662
Likes: 2
From: Scottsdale AZ
Default

yea but its supposed to be cross balanced. each weighing the same.
heres an example

lf = 560 rf = 600


lr = 440 rr = 460

however after being ballnced they should be the same when crossed, as is the left front and right rear should weigh the same as the right front and the left rear


lf = 565 * * rf = 595 = 1030
* *
*
lr = 435 * * rr = 4765 = 1030
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2007 | 08:34 AM
  #6  
Q45tech's Avatar
Q45tech
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 984
Likes: 0
From: Marietta, Georgia
Default

The problem is correcting for weight change as fuel is consummed and the rear center of gravity as the fuel moves left and right.

Race cars adjust rear sway bar stiffness as fuel is consummed.

One can get carried away too as the incremental gains are small.
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2007 | 09:27 AM
  #7  
Kolia's Avatar
Kolia
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,821
Likes: 3
From: Columbus, Ohio
Default

Originally Posted by Q45tech
The problem is correcting for weight change as fuel is consummed and the rear center of gravity as the fuel moves left and right.

Race cars adjust rear sway bar stiffness as fuel is consummed.

One can get carried away too as the incremental gains are small.
You remind me of the old F1 that used to run 300-350 liters of fuel for the races. They had an adjustable CG. Moving weight around the inside of the car on sliders.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
reno56
Interior
17
Nov 20, 2015 05:21 PM
DarkCreep
SoCal Marketplace
6
Oct 17, 2015 11:50 PM
Paul.
Autocross/Road
5
Oct 16, 2015 07:34 PM
RiujinZero
Autocross/Road
7
Sep 25, 2015 01:19 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:21 PM.