Notices
Brakes & Suspension 350Z stoppers, coils, shocks/dampers

corner balancing

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-10-2007, 05:51 PM
  #1  
bbs350z
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (85)
 
bbs350z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Scottsdale AZ
Posts: 6,662
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default corner balancing

how many of you buy fully adjustable coilovers and dont corner balance them? reason being because i am reading the latest issue of modified and there is a complete section on it. any of you that go roadracing, etc. adjust each corner differently, do you notice a significant difference?
Old 06-11-2007, 05:15 AM
  #2  
Kolia
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Kolia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 2,821
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Corner balancing is the while point of getting a ride height adjustable suspension.

Not corner balancing after getting a coil over kit is a waste of a potentially great setup. Like getting really good set of tires and running them with 50 psi of pressure...
Old 06-11-2007, 05:25 AM
  #3  
Q45tech
Registered User
 
Q45tech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Marietta, Georgia
Posts: 984
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Rather than artificially adjusting ride height why not first exactly balance the body weight with the designated driver in place.

Necessary to weigh the weight on each wheel.

Oem designs for a 155 pound driver, so excess will have to be trimmed away.

Last edited by Q45tech; 06-11-2007 at 10:34 AM.
Old 06-11-2007, 09:30 AM
  #4  
HARRYPOTTER
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
HARRYPOTTER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Bronx N.Y.
Posts: 1,055
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Corner balancing along with Tire temperature reading for camber adjustments are the best....atleast that's the route I go....
Old 06-11-2007, 01:25 PM
  #5  
bbs350z
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (85)
 
bbs350z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Scottsdale AZ
Posts: 6,662
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

yea but its supposed to be cross balanced. each weighing the same.
heres an example

lf = 560 rf = 600


lr = 440 rr = 460

however after being ballnced they should be the same when crossed, as is the left front and right rear should weigh the same as the right front and the left rear


lf = 565 * * rf = 595 = 1030
* *
*
lr = 435 * * rr = 4765 = 1030
Old 06-12-2007, 08:34 AM
  #6  
Q45tech
Registered User
 
Q45tech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Marietta, Georgia
Posts: 984
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The problem is correcting for weight change as fuel is consummed and the rear center of gravity as the fuel moves left and right.

Race cars adjust rear sway bar stiffness as fuel is consummed.

One can get carried away too as the incremental gains are small.
Old 06-12-2007, 09:27 AM
  #7  
Kolia
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Kolia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 2,821
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Q45tech
The problem is correcting for weight change as fuel is consummed and the rear center of gravity as the fuel moves left and right.

Race cars adjust rear sway bar stiffness as fuel is consummed.

One can get carried away too as the incremental gains are small.
You remind me of the old F1 that used to run 300-350 liters of fuel for the races. They had an adjustable CG. Moving weight around the inside of the car on sliders.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
reno56
Interior
17
11-20-2015 05:21 PM
DarkCreep
SoCal Marketplace
6
10-17-2015 11:50 PM
Paul.
Autocross/Road
5
10-16-2015 07:34 PM
RiujinZero
Autocross/Road
7
09-25-2015 01:19 PM



Quick Reply: corner balancing



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:56 AM.