Notices
Brakes & Suspension 350Z stoppers, coils, shocks/dampers

Cutting my Eibach Springs...I know I know but this should work!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-11-2007, 03:58 PM
  #21  
Gsedan35
New Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Gsedan35's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Central California
Posts: 3,121
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Z04

as for you progressive spring coilover, here is a few:

Bilstein PSS and PSS9
KW Variants
H&R coilovers
Bilstein front's are linear, not progressive.

Technically the HKS LS+ and RS coilover rear springs are progressive because the utilize a tapered spring design.

H&R coilovers are progressive? I'm not aware of anyone owning them here, let along anyone posting pic's of the setup itself vs reselller pics that show pics of a non Z33 product (though what I saw did have progressive springs, just wasn't a Z setup).
Old 12-12-2007, 03:43 AM
  #22  
Z04
Registered User
iTrader: (15)
 
Z04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Clarksville, Tennessee
Posts: 6,612
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Gsedan35
Bilstein front's are linear, not progressive.

Technically the HKS LS+ and RS coilover rear springs are progressive because the utilize a tapered spring design.

H&R coilovers are progressive? I'm not aware of anyone owning them here, let along anyone posting pic's of the setup itself vs reselller pics that show pics of a non Z33 product (though what I saw did have progressive springs, just wasn't a Z setup).

i added the H&R because they (the product description) lists them as being progressive all around, didn't even look at the picture because they rarely show the actual product for your specific car. and according to nissan performance mag article on the PSS9, they are front and rear progressive (pics are great too)

http://www.nissanperformancemag.com/april06/350z_turbo/
Old 12-12-2007, 04:41 AM
  #23  
yusoslo
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
yusoslo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Pig Heaven VA
Posts: 2,153
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Well I have to say thank you for providing me with the information on the progressive rate coilovers. I am going to research the spring rates and go from there.

Back to prove my point about cutting the springs. Tensile strength nor shear nor any opposing force that the spring can handle will be changed. It will result in inadvertantly changing the spring rate since now there is less material to distribute the force/weight. This would become very obvious when cutting a stock spring in half. I used a string and found out that my coil spring is over 5' of material so removing 1 linear inch would result in removing 1/60th of the material.

I am going to stop here.

To appease everyone I will not be cutting my springs, but I wanted to prove a point.
Old 12-12-2007, 05:09 AM
  #24  
WalkerT
Professional
iTrader: (13)
 
WalkerT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Flower Mound, TX
Posts: 1,625
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The thing you are over looking is the spring has (lets say) 6 coils to hold and react to about 1800 lbs of pressure from the front end. Cutting one out and thinking 5 coils will hold 1800 lbs and react the same as 6 does not make sense. You are changing the load on each coil. By increasing the load this will change to rate of compression.
Old 12-12-2007, 05:11 AM
  #25  
jadaniya
Banned
iTrader: (22)
 
jadaniya's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 1,462
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

stop being so irritating guys. the op knows what he's doing. he obviously knows alot, and if there were coilovers meeting his needs he'd get them!
Old 12-12-2007, 06:03 AM
  #26  
WalkerT
Professional
iTrader: (13)
 
WalkerT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Flower Mound, TX
Posts: 1,625
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

How was my comment irritating? He ask for opinions and there it is.
Old 12-12-2007, 06:17 AM
  #27  
Z1 Performance
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (564)
 
Z1 Performance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 19,266
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by yusoslo
OK, first of all I am not Ghetto! I have plenty of money to do this the right way....but I want a comfortable ride......Show me a coilover setup with progressive rate springs..my Eibachs ride better than stock.

I have a set of 2k coilovers in my garage now. I also have a set of custom built RE-Amenyia coiovers for my RX-7.

So now that that is out of the way, tell me how this will effect ride quality. If at most I am removing 1/5 of 1 coil's overall circumfrence. How can this be damaging...please do tell.
plenty of coilovers with progressive springs and the mere existance of progressive or linear means....absolutely NOTHING. It is all about the interaction between the spring, your wheel, your tire and the valving of the damper. There are many coilovers out there which are incredbily comfortable. Going the route you are going might work but its completely wrong, and you risk ruining a perfectly good set of springs for 1/4 inch of height....sounds a bit lame to me
Old 12-12-2007, 06:18 AM
  #28  
Z1 Performance
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (564)
 
Z1 Performance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 19,266
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by yusoslo

AS I said before.....show me a height adustable coilver with stock or better ride quality and I WILL buy it. And I doubt there is a progressive rate coilover on the market.
Bilstein PSS or PSS9, KW Variant II - just to name 2

https://my350z.com/forum/suspension/319792-want-coilovers-that-pass-the-wife-test.html

Last edited by Z1 Performance; 12-12-2007 at 06:20 AM.
Old 12-12-2007, 07:12 AM
  #29  
yusoslo
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
yusoslo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Pig Heaven VA
Posts: 2,153
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Well I started this post with an idea, and I learned a bit. Now that I know there are choices out there I will shop around for some coilovers that fit my needs.

Anyways thanks alot guys for the informative responses. I just become irritated when people post up abscure reponses with no method of backing it.

Thanks again for the info
Old 12-12-2007, 07:23 AM
  #30  
97supratt
Registered User
iTrader: (61)
 
97supratt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Glendale California
Posts: 5,034
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by yusoslo
Well I started this post with an idea, and I learned a bit. Now that I know there are choices out there I will shop around for some coilovers that fit my needs.

Anyways thanks alot guys for the informative responses. I just become irritated when people post up abscure reponses with no method of backing it.

Thanks again for the info

Glad to help.

Fat chick idea was the best though.
Old 12-12-2007, 07:35 AM
  #31  
track04
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
track04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: chicago
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

k = Gd4/8nD3
this is the formula for finding spring rate.
here is what each letter represents

k = constant, pounds of load per inch of deflection
G = modulus of rigidity of spring material, pounds per square inch
d = wire diameter, inches
n = number of active coils, which is the number of coils subjected to flexure (always less than the total number of coils)
D = mean coil diameter, inches = Outer Diameter - Wire Diameter

G, d, and D will all stay the same when cutting a spring
n will decrease by the amount you cut the spring, so when everything gets placed back in the equation, your spring rate "k" will be greater
Old 12-12-2007, 07:39 AM
  #32  
97supratt
Registered User
iTrader: (61)
 
97supratt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Glendale California
Posts: 5,034
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I just lost my appetite with all this math.
Old 12-12-2007, 07:44 AM
  #33  
kuah@splparts.com
Vendor - Former Vendor
iTrader: (10)
 
kuah@splparts.com's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 221
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by yusoslo
very humorous.
I still don't think it ricerish. So whatever to the Civic comments...and BTW 99% of us have had a civic at one point.
I am just going to beat a dead hoarse over this...it isnt like I am heating up stock springs, or chopping off 2 coils of the stock spring.
Who here that has chimed in has an engineering degree? No ok then. I am well knowledged in mechanical engineer since I have a Master's in it, so someone show me PROOF.

I want PROOF instead of BS its ghetto to cut/tailor your springs.
Cutting the spring will increase the spring rate, the change in rate is inversely proportional to the change in length. From what you are describing it probably won't affect the spring rate too much. Of course that is assuming you do not heat up the spring too much when cutting it.

Keep in mind several interactions with the rest of the suspension -- The shock valving is probably not a big issue if the spring rate is not significantly changed. However you will change the stroke of the shock, so you may hit the bump stop on the shock under bump. The suspension arms may bottom out under bump as well, most notably the front upper arms are known to bottom out against the fender/frame (when suspension travel is reduced without adequately increasing spring rate).
Old 12-12-2007, 08:18 AM
  #34  
Gsedan35
New Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Gsedan35's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Central California
Posts: 3,121
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by kuah@splparts.com
Cutting the spring will increase the spring rate, the change in rate is inversely proportional to the change in length. From what you are describing it probably won't affect the spring rate too much. Of course that is assuming you do not heat up the spring too much when cutting it.

Keep in mind several interactions with the rest of the suspension -- The shock valving is probably not a big issue if the spring rate is not significantly changed. However you will change the stroke of the shock, so you may hit the bump stop on the shock under bump. The suspension arms may bottom out under bump as well, most notably the front upper arms are known to bottom out against the fender/frame (when suspension travel is reduced without adequately increasing spring rate).
I don't think his art work helped matters since it gives the illusion that the springs are linear ones. Eibach prokits are progressive springs. I think he ment to suggest he would be cutting a short section out of the upper progressive part. It's doubtfull that it would have a meaningfull impact on spring rate since the number of active coils covering the softer initial spring rate would not change by much. However slight a additional 1/4" front drop would be, what you mention about piston stroke and the bumpstops is spot on, though it's not really possible to compress the oem bumpstops enough to bottom out the suspension arms. Here's a picture of 350Z eibach prokits, the front springs are of course on the right hand side.

Eibach 350Z progressive springs 1”/1”
Spring rates in LBS initial/final front 296/384 initial/final rear 316/421

Old 12-12-2007, 08:42 AM
  #35  
kuah@splparts.com
Vendor - Former Vendor
iTrader: (10)
 
kuah@splparts.com's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 221
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Gsedan35
though it's not really possible to compress the oem bumpstops enough to bottom out the suspension arms.
On the front suspension, our experience is that the upper arm ball joint will hit the fender/frame before the shock bottoms out. You may recall the big thread on the G35 forum about the SPC arms on G35s lowered with springs...

It is not so common that the suspension arms bottom out before the shock, but if you look at the 350Z/G35 front suspension, the front shock has a lot of effective stroke, due to the moment ratio to the wheel -- very roughly the ratio is almost 2:1, so 4" of travel at the wheel is only 2" at the shock. That makes it alot more likely for the upper arms to bottom out, or for the ball joint to bind, before the shock bottoms out.

Assuming yusolo measures his shock and suspension travel accordingly and ensures that everything will work, then he is not doing anything "ghetto' in cutting his springs. Cutting springs is not universally bad, but some engineering has to be involved.

Last edited by kuah@splparts.com; 12-12-2007 at 08:48 AM.
Old 12-12-2007, 08:52 AM
  #36  
Armitage
350Z-holic
iTrader: (15)
 
Armitage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: North Jersey
Posts: 5,163
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 97supratt
Glad to help.

Fat chick idea was the best though.
Its biased to the passenger side though!
Old 12-12-2007, 10:55 PM
  #37  
TimeAttkZ
Registered User
iTrader: (14)
 
TimeAttkZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: OC
Posts: 1,193
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

hahaha theres nothing comfortable about eibach springs... and yes I have eibach springs on my Z so I know it rides like **** from experience. I cant wait to get them off for a new set of coilovers soon!

You want true comfort get some KW varient 3's.
Old 12-13-2007, 12:07 AM
  #38  
Control 350z
Registered User
 
Control 350z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: sacramento
Posts: 856
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

ok as a former employee/designer for ground control i think i should have a better idea on how this works...

1) as for cutting the springs they will increase your spring rate as shown in below (thank you track04)

2) in about 85% of companies that make progressive factory replacement springs (ie: not coilovers) the progressive part of the spring (the top) is generaly used to only hold the car up with factory weight. they are generaly wound tighter and thicker than factory spring. this gives you the lowered stance and the ability to hold the car up.

3) if you dont know how spring rates work here is the basics if you have a spring with a rate of 400lbs it takes 400lbs to compress it 1" 800lbs for 2" and 1200lbs for 3". by cutting one linear inch off of the spring you have reduced the distance of compression so it will add more to your spring rate. you say you like the ride of the eibachs at their current setting. but you have no idea if you will like it with the higher spring rate HIGHER RATE + LOWER CAR = ROUGHER RIDE

4) also progressive springs twist more than linear springs as they are compressed, so by cutting part of the spring it puts more stress on the spring when compressed, wich as you should know causes the structural integrity to lower. wich can cause coil bind and even a coil snap, neither of wich are good for the shocks. and in a case of coil snap you can damage other parts of the suspension and wheels, not to mention the front end of your car slamming into the ground.

i may have forgotten somethings but it is 1am and im kinda tired

Originally Posted by track04
k = Gd4/8nD3
this is the formula for finding spring rate.
here is what each letter represents

k = constant, pounds of load per inch of deflection
G = modulus of rigidity of spring material, pounds per square inch
d = wire diameter, inches
n = number of active coils, which is the number of coils subjected to flexure (always less than the total number of coils)
D = mean coil diameter, inches = Outer Diameter - Wire Diameter

G, d, and D will all stay the same when cutting a spring
n will decrease by the amount you cut the spring, so when everything gets placed back in the equation, your spring rate "k" will be greater
Old 12-13-2007, 04:46 AM
  #39  
Z1 Performance
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (564)
 
Z1 Performance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 19,266
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TimeAttkZ
hahaha theres nothing comfortable about eibach springs... and yes I have eibach springs on my Z so I know it rides like **** from experience. I cant wait to get them off for a new set of coilovers soon!
Eibach (at leas the prokit) happens to be very comfortable - your tire choice/pressure , or perhaps other factors (worn shocks, worn bushings) is what is making your car uncomfortable, not the springs themselves
Old 12-13-2007, 09:41 AM
  #40  
Chef-J
Booooosstt!!
iTrader: (58)
 
Chef-J's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Dallas/NewYork/Michigan/Korea
Posts: 5,311
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by yusoslo
Well I started this post with an idea, and I learned a bit. Now that I know there are choices out there I will shop around for some coilovers that fit my needs.

Anyways thanks alot guys for the informative responses. I just become irritated when people post up abscure reponses with no method of backing it.

Thanks again for the info

Thank god that you going right direction!


Quick Reply: Cutting my Eibach Springs...I know I know but this should work!!!



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:49 PM.