Notices
Brakes & Suspension 350Z stoppers, coils, shocks/dampers

To Those Lowering

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 11, 2008 | 07:55 AM
  #1  
tekk's Avatar
tekk
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 471
Likes: 0
From: Caribbean
Default To Those Lowering

Do you take into account the effects of the change in the roll couple and other characteristics? Are there any guidelines on the point where the Z/G can get so low that the drawbacks outweigh the benefits? Has anyone done any calculations/ estimates on this? Thanks
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2008 | 08:24 AM
  #2  
350zspl's Avatar
350zspl
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,248
Likes: 4
From: florida
Default

Originally Posted by tekk
Do you take into account the effects of the change in the roll couple and other characteristics? Are there any guidelines on the point where the Z/G can get so low that the drawbacks outweigh the benefits? Has anyone done any calculations/ estimates on this? Thanks
if you are out to lower your car for looks than the cons do not matter


as far as lowering to gain performance , i would guess that buy reducing your center of gravity ,might help in cornering at high speed , other than that i can't see a benefit to lowering

i can think of many cons to lowering

cons>pros
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2008 | 08:36 AM
  #3  
tekk's Avatar
tekk
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 471
Likes: 0
From: Caribbean
Default

my understanding is that as you lower the car you do have benefits but you also increase some negative handling characteristics.. and i was wondering if anyone has estimated this, and to what extent it is applicable. in particular, i am asking about the effects of changing the roll center/coupe..and accounting for it either static or otherwise
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2008 | 08:48 AM
  #4  
350zspl's Avatar
350zspl
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,248
Likes: 4
From: florida
Default

Originally Posted by tekk
my understanding is that as you lower the car you do have benefits but you also increase some negative handling characteristics.. and i was wondering if anyone has estimated this, and to what extent it is applicable. in particular, i am asking about the effects of changing the roll center/coupe..and accounting for it either static or otherwise
i guess i drive my to conservative to feel these enhanced characteristics found thru lowering

i have owned the below slammed

1987 Iroc Z slammed
1989 Mustang GT slammed
1992 Iroc Z slammed
1992 Mustang GT slammed
2006 Nissan 350z Slammed

always i find the negs outway the pos

but i will follow thread to learn what they have to say
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2008 | 09:30 AM
  #5  
ReelBigAndy's Avatar
ReelBigAndy
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 456
Likes: 0
From: Fredericksburg, VA
Default

Originally Posted by 350zspl
if you are out to lower your car for looks than the cons do not matter


as far as lowering to gain performance , i would guess that buy reducing your center of gravity ,might help in cornering at high speed , other than that i can't see a benefit to lowering

i can think of many cons to lowering

cons>pros

Sometimes there are aerodynamic advantages to be gained by lowering a car. Cars that can benefit from this will have a "sweet spot" amount of ground clearance that will decrease drag. I'm not sure what height this is for the Z. Being a sports car, I would imagine that stock height is already pretty close to this.
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2008 | 09:40 AM
  #6  
terrorist22's Avatar
terrorist22
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 260
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
Default

Those kind of measurements are only really necessary on the track. I don't know if anybody can even afford the equipment to track or simulate car behavior at the limit.

I doubt you will notice any aero benefits to your car either.
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2008 | 09:56 AM
  #7  
ke0ki2k's Avatar
ke0ki2k
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,471
Likes: 0
From: Knoxville, Tennessee
Default

go to the motorsports section. ask the guys in there, they'll know alot more about performance enhancing suspension changes than the guys in this section of the forum.
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2008 | 10:55 AM
  #8  
tekk's Avatar
tekk
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 471
Likes: 0
From: Caribbean
Default

Originally Posted by terrorist22
Those kind of measurements are only really necessary on the track. I don't know if anybody can even afford the equipment to track or simulate car behavior at the limit.

I doubt you will notice any aero benefits to your car either.
i definitely recognize benefits of lower cg, and could buy a little aero benefit too.

but im skeptical that you have to be on the track to consider these issues. i think there are some who would like to know they have a well setup car for their money, for any kind of driving.

For example, bump steer can be an issue. Also, as i understand it, if you lower your car you have to stiffen your springs because if you don't, you will end up with more body roll. so that would mean you have to stiffen your springs to break even on body roll. then if you wanted to limit body roll from stock you have to stiffen further from there. but how much are we talking about? or does this apply to the suspension on the FM platform? if it does apply, at what point would the incremental benefit of a slightly lower cg be offset by a other poor handling characteristics? (i would imagine this may depend on personal taste to an extent)

i agree that the equipment to do live testing is probably expensive.. however maybe there are ways to understand and approximate various scenarios?
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2008 | 10:57 AM
  #9  
350zspl's Avatar
350zspl
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,248
Likes: 4
From: florida
Default

on mine 2006 350z

hotchkis F & R sways
Megan Racing coil overs
Volk 19x9 and 19 x 10.5
245-30-19 & 265-30-19

i can't notice any benefit on the street
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2008 | 01:59 PM
  #10  
350ZTheStandard's Avatar
350ZTheStandard
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 9,022
Likes: 3
From: NEW AMERICA
Default

Originally Posted by tekk
Do you take into account the effects of the change in the roll couple and other characteristics? Are there any guidelines on the point where the Z/G can get so low that the drawbacks outweigh the benefits? Has anyone done any calculations/ estimates on this? Thanks
What the F are you smoking???

If the wheels don't hit the fender liners and speed bumps aren't killing you then the Z car is a screamer. Lowering the car with coilovers will still allow for adjustability at the track on the city streets.

How can this not be good, unless you don't align the front end after the mods & you are having tire feathering.
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2008 | 02:27 PM
  #11  
rkd350z's Avatar
rkd350z
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,237
Likes: 0
From: So Cal
Thumbs up

coilover!

personally got Stance!
Attached Thumbnails To Those Lowering-sa504169.jpg   To Those Lowering-sa504178.jpg   To Those Lowering-sa504174.jpg  
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2008 | 02:31 PM
  #12  
Z1NONLY's Avatar
Z1NONLY
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 6,503
Likes: 95
From: SW Fl
Default

Originally Posted by tekk
Do you take into account the effects of the change in the roll couple and other characteristics? Are there any guidelines on the point where the Z/G can get so low that the drawbacks outweigh the benefits? Has anyone done any calculations/ estimates on this? Thanks
I lowered my Z a total of 1". Some of the lowering (.4") was due to slightly shorter tires, and the other .6" came from RS-R Ti2000 springs.

Even thought the springs were very close to sotck spring rates, both the wife and I noticed a handling benefit imidiately.

The best way I can describe it is by using a crowbar analogy. Before the .6" drop the weight of the car seemed to have a longer "crowbar" with which to apply forces on the suspension in a turn. This made the Z "throw its weight around" more than after it was lowered. Lowering the Z brought that point on the imaginary crowbar lower to the ground, effectively shortening the "crowbar" and making the Z feel lighter on its feet.

The difference was not dramatic, but it was noticeable for both driver and passenger alike.

The only downside was an increase in negative camber. Total of -1.4 front and -2 for the rear.

Many would not be happy with the way those numbers would wear tires. But I autocross a lot, and the negative camber works well in turns. I go through two sets of tires a year anyway, and my autocrossing wears the outsides of the tires enough to even out the inside wear caused by DD on -2 degrees of camber.
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2008 | 07:13 AM
  #13  
terrorist22's Avatar
terrorist22
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 260
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
Default

Tekk, try checking if Bosch Motorsports still has their LapSim demo. That might help a little. But in all honesty, roll couple is nothing to look at on a DD and would be a waste of time and money. I guess I didn't know whether you are talking about a track setup or a daily driver

Here's another way to look at things:

http://e30m3performance.com/myths/We..._transfer2.htm

Last edited by terrorist22; Feb 13, 2008 at 08:26 AM.
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2008 | 11:45 AM
  #14  
tekk's Avatar
tekk
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 471
Likes: 0
From: Caribbean
Default

Originally Posted by terrorist22
Tekk, try checking if Bosch Motorsports still has their LapSim demo. That might help a little. But in all honesty, roll couple is nothing to look at on a DD and would be a waste of time and money. I guess I didn't know whether you are talking about a track setup or a daily driver

Here's another way to look at things:

http://e30m3performance.com/myths/We..._transfer2.htm
thanks. yes i will look for that demo. and yes i saw that link...you're saying you think the impact on the car is minimal unless you are doing 10/10ths at the track?

another question.

i have a g35. its lowered. but while the handling feels very good and stable at high speed, ive noticed bumpsteer when im turning hard over rough surfaces. any thoughts?
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2008 | 01:00 PM
  #15  
terrorist22's Avatar
terrorist22
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 260
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
Default

I can tell you that lowering my car by whatever (haven't checked), I have not noticed anything negative other than my Amuse exhaust getting scraped to hell once in a while. My car looks a lot better. It corners a lot better too; the cornering speeds I have noticed are a lot higher. All on a daily driving basis. These kind of improvements are enough for most drivers.

The stuff you want to know (I'm nowhere near an expert) is more oriented getting the most grip out of your tires, and attaining the balance you want at the limit. Just a quick surfing on the internet, bump steer is more of a geometry thing. If you are prepared to spend the money then do it. I have noticed a lot of bumpsteer, but it's at controllable speeds. If I was going 150 mph, I would be concerned.
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2008 | 09:56 PM
  #16  
LaZeEbOi177's Avatar
LaZeEbOi177
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
From: San Francisco, CA
Default

Originally Posted by rkd350z
coilover!

personally got Stance!
looks nice, whats your drop?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lt_Ballzacki
Brakes & Suspension
39
Aug 6, 2021 06:19 AM
MicVelo
2003-2009 Nissan 350Z
34
May 30, 2017 03:28 PM
ars88
Zs & Gs For Sale
18
Apr 4, 2016 07:52 AM
James1990
Brakes & Suspension
10
Dec 16, 2015 08:57 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:11 PM.