Does anyone have an opinion on which one you would rather have? The pros and cons...

 

Oh I also forgot, about H & R lowering springs.

 

I'll toss this out their for you.

Eibach 350Z spring rates front 296/384 rear 316/421

The eibachs are progressively wound springs as I'm sure the other's are as well. But you might want to call them to find out for sure. If you call sprint, they may reveal their spring rate info to you. H&R techs will lamely claim they as tech's, aren't given such info, BULL!

I've owned H&R springs in the past, they were excellent.

Since I don't believe in progressive springs on a performance car I'm not interested in any of them. But I'd thought I'd give you some imput

 

sprints dont have the best reputation, but they sure drop the car alot! By the way, we have H&R's for $269, Eibach's for $219, and Tanabe's for $265, but i can sell the Tanabe's for $254. If you want sprints i can get them for you too!

www.hopupracing.com

 

sprint doesn't have the ' best ' reputation because they're not made in germany? their price difference can make up for that buddy.

 

why not RS-Rs? I have them and love them. Lower the car .6 inch. They slightly improve ride quality but the help handeling alot. I would recommend them!

 

dont buy the sprint springs i have them and they only lowered the car about .5 of an inch. they dont lower the car 1.75 that they claim. i sent sprint a picture of my car w/ theri springs on it . and the sprint rep. even said something was wrong w/ the drop height. i am buying a set of h & R's to replace the sprint ones.