I keep mine on full hard most of the time and think I may need to look into another kit. I got them before since it is my DD and I wanted a nice ride but now I push the car more and it's just not setup for track driving.

 

got any pics of where your edfc is mounted?

 

yes same here, my car is daily driven. If theres a proper track here, I would definitely change it ...

 

Here you go

 

whoa rhd? nice

 

Old topic but it helped me out with a good review on the CS. It almost seems to be too soft with the word bounce being used so often. I guess to be absolutely honest I'm looking for a setup a little stiffer than stock that will allow for ride height adjustments. I'd get the basics but in all honesty I'm afraid i won't like the damping and will be forced to live with it. At the very least the CS will give me some choices, even if I happily have it set to the stiffest setting.

The flex sounds like overkill for me. Thinking either the Tein CS, BC, or Nismo at this point. The only down side to Nismo is I'm running slightly undersize tire diameters and the gap is ugly (picture below).

What do you think everyone, does it sound like I'm going down the right road? The car will only see the track on days when I just feel like having fun. No time slips to hold on to, no competing with others.... If anything I'll just be a straight line fun car with the twin turbos. Thanks.

Current view of the car (stock suspension)
18x10,11 265,295/35

 

After reviewing the suspension FAQ, I'm even more afraid of getting the CS than before. The spring rates are extremely close to stock, which may very well be a good thing and it hits their marketing accurately. With the dampening set to it stiffest, is it noticeably stiffer than stock? My z isn't my DD so maybe I'm being to conservative. The Basics may be the overall happy medium between the CS and the Flex, no?

I always get the most antsy when I'm about to drop some money on something so thanks for any feedback.

 

nice review I've been interested in these