5AT vs. 6MT
My wife was driving at the 1/8 mile track at Qualcomm Stadium tonight and had some guy in a Grand Touring roadster come up against her. A little light smack talk, but it was soon put to rest. She took him in a bad way. She pulled a 9.886 @ 71.2 to his 11.256 @ 69.12. He was off the line first with a reaction of .798 to her .913, but she caught and passed him before the 60 foot mark, making a 2.320 to his 2.779. Not bad for her first night out, and actually put a few things to rest concerning our car, giving me more of a reason to want to put it on a dyno. Too many people have been telling us we have a freak.
Originally Posted by CAN0802
My wife was driving at the 1/8 mile track at Qualcomm Stadium tonight and had some guy in a Grand Touring roadster come up against her. A little light smack talk, but it was soon put to rest. She took him in a bad way. She pulled a 9.886 @ 71.2 to his 11.256 @ 69.12. He was off the line first with a reaction of .798 to her .913, but she caught and passed him before the 60 foot mark, making a 2.320 to his 2.779. Not bad for her first night out, and actually put a few things to rest concerning our car, giving me more of a reason to want to put it on a dyno. Too many people have been telling us we have a freak.
Yes, mine is the 5AT. The funny thing is, I was expecting someone to talk about a misshift, but I was there and if he misshifted, it sure didn't sound like it. I thought it was funny for all the smack my wife said he was talking on the line.
I also noticed how differently people treat women racers, even when she lost, she was still getting cheered on by the crowd.
I also noticed how differently people treat women racers, even when she lost, she was still getting cheered on by the crowd.
9.8s at 71mph is a 15.2 second car. I'm afraid that's hardly freakish and actually terribly slow for a Z. The 11.256 @ 69.12 is an 18 second car. Sounds like neither driver was good.
Trending Topics
Originally Posted by Dave B
9.8s at 71mph is a 15.2 second car. I'm afraid that's hardly freakish and actually terribly slow for a Z. The 11.256 @ 69.12 is an 18 second car. Sounds like neither driver was good.
She tried a few different ways, even with the TCS off, but with the water they were dragging from the water box, it made its way to the line. they claimed to have put traction compound down before the races start, but most people spin a little when taking off. I have found another track, which is supposedly better, so we'll have to see what happens there.
Originally Posted by CAN0802
She tried a few different ways, even with the TCS off, but with the water they were dragging from the water box, it made its way to the line. they claimed to have put traction compound down before the races start, but most people spin a little when taking off. I have found another track, which is supposedly better, so we'll have to see what happens there.
Irwindale has the best preped 1/8 mile track in So. Cal. If your hoping to get better traction from California Speedway or Palmdale (1/4 mile tracks), its not going to be easy (with a 5AT, I think it would be a tad easier at least).
Originally Posted by BriGuyMax
I could pedal my bike through the 60' quicker than 2.77....:P
60 foot = 20 yards but i will admit i am more topend
Originally Posted by CAN0802
She tried a few different ways, even with the TCS off, but with the water they were dragging from the water box, it made its way to the line. they claimed to have put traction compound down before the races start, but most people spin a little when taking off. I have found another track, which is supposedly better, so we'll have to see what happens there.
Is there no way to drive around the water box? and just spin them enough to get the junk cleaned off
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post






