Notices
Drag NHRA, IDRC, IHRA, NDRA
View Poll Results: Keep the list as is or add another Bolt on list for the 07's
Keep it the way it is
20.69%
Add another list just for the 07 and newer engines
79.31%
Voters: 87. You may not vote on this poll

Question about the TOP 25 list regarding the 07 engine

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-17-2007, 12:23 PM
  #1  
ACEMAN
Master
Thread Starter
iTrader: (29)
 
ACEMAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Hagerstown MD
Posts: 2,774
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Question Question about the TOP 25 list regarding the 07 engine

Hey Guys,

I have a question and a concern when it comes to the 07's in the Bolt on list.

We all know they are a much stronger engine from the factory then the older VQ35DE engines.

SO, my question is... Should we have a Bolt-on list just for the 07's? Because as it is now the 07's are running faster times STOCK then most are running with Bolt-ons. Once they have Bolt-on they will be bumping most of the older engines off of the list and then the list will be mainly the 07's.

When it comes to FI or Nitrous i dont see this as big of a issue.

What is everyone thoughts on this, please discuss.

Let me know

Todd

Last edited by ACEMAN; 05-21-2007 at 03:34 PM.
ACEMAN is offline  
Old 05-17-2007, 12:45 PM
  #2  
singh
_______________
iTrader: (2)
 
singh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 5,352
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

We should have a bolt-on list for the 07's just to keep things comparable. Also, that way we can see the improved engine 'OWN' the VQDE.
singh is offline  
Old 05-17-2007, 12:47 PM
  #3  
Bumpinjeep
New Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Bumpinjeep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bellevue Wa
Posts: 5,743
Received 25 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Please have a bolt on list on the 07s Thanks
Bumpinjeep is offline  
Old 05-17-2007, 12:47 PM
  #4  
__jb
Z + Rear Seat
iTrader: (3)
 
__jb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: St.Pete,FL
Posts: 1,642
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by gsingh350Z
We should have a bolt-on list for the 07's just to keep things comparable. Also, that way we can see the improved engine 'OWN' the VQDE.
I agree.

Now aceman will have to buy more trophies...
__jb is offline  
Old 05-17-2007, 01:41 PM
  #5  
davidv
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
davidv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 42,754
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

The 2007 stock pushed me from #9 to #13. No big deal.

For the all-motor class, the 2007 will be a challenge. What I think you will see is that the 2007 is difficult to improve. The bump in all-motor is 13.77 seconds. I see the modified 2007 making the bump, but not decimating the entire class. Besides, I look forward to competing against the 2007.

For the time being leave it alone.
davidv is offline  
Old 05-17-2007, 01:47 PM
  #6  
ACEMAN
Master
Thread Starter
iTrader: (29)
 
ACEMAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Hagerstown MD
Posts: 2,774
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Thumbs up

Originally Posted by davidv
The 2007 stock pushed me from #9 to #13. No big deal.

For the all-motor class, the 2007 will be a challenge. What I think you will see is that the 2007 is difficult to improve. The bump in all-motor is 13.77 seconds. I see the modified 2007 making the bump, but not decimating the entire class. Besides, I look forward to competing against the 2007.

For the time being leave it alone.
I know its going to take time for mods to come out for the new engine, but factor in just one thing ( slicks, Dr's ). If Veetec can run a 13.3 with stock tires, what do you think will happen with Slicks and nothing else? Then they start changing other parts ( pullies, flywheels, final drive, heads, cams, intake ) you see where i am going with this.

Just thought i would get everyones opinions before i make or not make the change. This thread was put together for the community and i want to make sure everyone who cares can voice their opinion on the matter.

I just wanted to start this thread now, before more people get bumped off of the Bolt-on list.

Thanks for everyones opinions thus far...

Later
Todd
ACEMAN is offline  
Old 05-17-2007, 01:57 PM
  #7  
davidv
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
davidv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 42,754
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by aceman
I know its going to take time for mods to come out for the new engine, but factor in just one thing ( slicks, Dr's ). If Veetec can run a 13.3 with stock tires, what do you think will happen with Slicks and nothing else? Then they start changing other parts ( pullies, flywheels, final drive, heads, cams, intake ) you see where i am going with this.

Just thought i would get everyones opinions before i make or not make the change. This thread was put together for the community and i want to make sure everyone who cares can voice their opinion on the matter.

I just wanted to start this thread now, before more people get bumped off of the Bolt-on list.

Thanks for everyones opinions thus far...

Later
Todd
I forgot about the 2007 with slicks. Good point.
davidv is offline  
Old 05-17-2007, 03:58 PM
  #8  
3hree5ive0ero
Retired Admin
iTrader: (95)
 
3hree5ive0ero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Dallas / Chicago
Posts: 1,337,017,813
Received 78 Likes on 50 Posts
Default

I personally don't care, as I don't see them as a threat just yet. However, for the sake of others, I'd recommend having a new class just for the HR engines.

Todd, if anything, we should just create a separate list in the same post. So in the same post it shows 2 different rankings list - 1 for DEs and 1 for HRs.
3hree5ive0ero is offline  
Old 05-17-2007, 04:03 PM
  #9  
Playboy's Z
Registered User
 
Playboy's Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: California
Posts: 857
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i agree with making a separate list i like knowing what the original z vq is running vs the new one.
Playboy's Z is offline  
Old 05-17-2007, 05:30 PM
  #10  
Peak350
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Peak350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: DeLand, Florida
Posts: 1,844
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I think that a separate list between DR's, full slicks, and street tires would be the best thing. Slicks will pull more off than the HR motor does.

When I've run I've thought I could get more out of the car, but its temperature and traction thats limiting me. Slicks would pull almost .6 off my run...easily if the car didn't bog (wouldn't with a good launch). So I don't think a .2-.3 tenth difference justifies the separation.
Peak350 is offline  
Old 05-17-2007, 05:34 PM
  #11  
jdifolco
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
jdifolco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 508
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Doesn't bother me. A separate list wouldn't be a bad idea, I say do it
jdifolco is offline  
Old 05-17-2007, 06:12 PM
  #12  
davidv
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
davidv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 42,754
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Peak350
I think that a separate list between DR's, full slicks, and street tires would be the best thing. Slicks will pull more off than the HR motor does.

When I've run I've thought I could get more out of the car, but its temperature and traction thats limiting me. Slicks would pull almost .6 off my run...easily if the car didn't bog (wouldn't with a good launch). So I don't think a .2-.3 tenth difference justifies the separation.
Im think we have too many lists now. An example is Nitrous. Nitrous is stagnant. The numbers remain the same. No one moves. No one competes. Its boring.
davidv is offline  
Old 05-17-2007, 07:16 PM
  #14  
Peak350
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Peak350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: DeLand, Florida
Posts: 1,844
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by davidv
Im think we have too many lists now. An example is Nitrous. Nitrous is stagnant. The numbers remain the same. No one moves. No one competes. Its boring.
Well - I think a single/dual turbo combination, even a if it was a general FI would be better.

Ultimately I'm only using the list to make a general comparison between my car and others and conditions vary enough that I already know where I stand.

I still say DR's/slicks are the biggest advantage. At the track here cars with DR's get lane choice so I usually get the slower lane (my best run was ironically in the slow lane ) meaning less chance of a great run.

Thats just my opinion though, yours may be different.
Peak350 is offline  
Old 05-17-2007, 07:18 PM
  #15  
trey.hutcheson
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
trey.hutcheson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I say create a separate list, but my motives are not benevolent. I'm at #23 right now. I'm already at a disadvantage to the other cars due to my weight penalty(g35 sedan). Once the 07s start making the modded list, I'm toast.

Hell, my full bolt-ons with DR's sedan is slower than the top 6 guys in the Stock list.
trey.hutcheson is offline  
Old 05-17-2007, 08:33 PM
  #16  
VeeTec
Registered User
 
VeeTec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Jackson County, GA
Posts: 1,384
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'm for a seperate list.

I know the GTO guys have a seperate list for the LS1 versus the LS2. I think the HR motor should have it's own list stock and with bolt ons.
VeeTec is offline  
Old 05-17-2007, 08:49 PM
  #17  
jdifolco
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
jdifolco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 508
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by VeeTec
I'm for a seperate list.

I know the GTO guys have a seperate list for the LS1 versus the LS2. I think the HR motor should have it's own list stock and with bolt ons.

agreed. Its makes sense. What about the the rev up. Is that not to much of a change to require a new list as well?
jdifolco is offline  
Old 05-17-2007, 09:01 PM
  #18  
bacalhau16
Registered User
iTrader: (32)
 
bacalhau16's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: dartmouth
Posts: 3,148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I dont see why there shouldnt be a seperate list. The motors are that different, and its obvious. There are still so many new members that are purchasing 03-06 Z's that would like to compare their cars to the list. If the list fills up with a bunch of 07's, its not a good comparison for them any longer.
bacalhau16 is offline  
Old 05-17-2007, 09:05 PM
  #19  
Hraesvelg
Got Uranium?
iTrader: (1)
 
Hraesvelg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: The Recliner of Rage
Posts: 35,723
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

definitely change the list when the Z gets the 3.7L... might keep it the same for now and play it by ear. The Z did gain a few pounds didn't it?
Hraesvelg is offline  
Old 05-17-2007, 09:51 PM
  #20  
turismo
Registered User
iTrader: (33)
 
turismo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: curl lookin boy
Posts: 8,448
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I say do it. Makes it more interesting.
turismo is offline  


Quick Reply: Question about the TOP 25 list regarding the 07 engine



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:23 PM.