X02 Exhaust Track results
I just got back from the track a little while ago to see how much my times changed now that I have an X02 exhaust. I ended up running my slowest times ever with this car. I'm not blaming the exhaust just yet though because it was humid and kinda hot today. I've been running consistant 13.9's every time I've been to the track with out my exhaust and with my 19's on. Tonight I ran a best of 14.108@97.87mph. My 60's were consistant 2.0's as usual. I very rarely get anything less. I uploaded slips my last trip to the track and tonights slips as a comparison. Maybe somebody can tell me what I should blame for these bad times and if the exhaust looks like it may be helping in any way. Thanks for the help.
July 20th runs(car 139):

Tonights runs (car 530):
July 20th runs(car 139):

Tonights runs (car 530):
Originally Posted by jonb7007
Try resetting your ecu.. Let it relearn the new exhaust.. Then post your times again.. I bet ull make betta times..
Originally Posted by ajcool2
So the ecu doesnt relearn by itself? I've been drinving around with the exhaust for about a week and thought maybe it just needed some time.
You have to reset it.. I have done that a few times.. Like extreme weather change.. mod change etc.. It works..
You can either disconnect the battery for a few mins.. Or.. http://www.technosquareinc.com/350reset.htm
http://forums.nicoclub.com/zerothrea...postid=2826682
Google reset ECU if you have any doubt.. Everyone in their mother does it.. So the ecu can relearn new mods....
http://www.mitsubishi-forums.com/t6606-reset-ecu.htm
Last edited by Jay'Z; Aug 24, 2007 at 07:43 PM.
Originally Posted by jonb7007
You have to reset it.. I have done that a few times.. Like extreme weather change.. mod change etc.. It works..
You can either disconnect the battery for a few mins.. Or.. http://www.technosquareinc.com/350reset.htm
http://forums.nicoclub.com/zerothrea...postid=2826682
You can either disconnect the battery for a few mins.. Or.. http://www.technosquareinc.com/350reset.htm
http://forums.nicoclub.com/zerothrea...postid=2826682
Your first 1/8th mph trap speed is actually slower now, but you are gaining 2+mph in the last 1/8th compared to your old runs. Perhaps you lost some valuable torque with this setup, but gained alittle hp in the process.
Your car is now slower to the 1/8th but faster in the last 1/8th so it would kinda make sense. But it would also mean that you may have lost a substantial amount of torque for it to be so noticeable.
Your car is now slower to the 1/8th but faster in the last 1/8th so it would kinda make sense. But it would also mean that you may have lost a substantial amount of torque for it to be so noticeable.
Trending Topics
You could perhaps have a slower 1-2 shift as well, seeing as how your 1/8th ET is also slower now. You were getting almost 9.00 1/8th's, but now its 9.2.
Did you change your shift point of technique?
Did you change your shift point of technique?
Originally Posted by bacalhau16
You could perhaps have a slower 1-2 shift as well, seeing as how your 1/8th ET is also slower now. You were getting almost 9.00 1/8th's, but now its 9.2.
Did you change your shift point of technique?
Did you change your shift point of technique?
Your 60 foot times are consistent. You should be very pleased.
The Z is running good picking up 22 MPH in the second 660 feet.
330 foot time is OK.
The only place that I am uncertain is the 1/8 miles time and trap. I would like to see better numbers.
The Z is running good picking up 22 MPH in the second 660 feet.
330 foot time is OK.
The only place that I am uncertain is the 1/8 miles time and trap. I would like to see better numbers.
Originally Posted by bacalhau16
Your first 1/8th mph trap speed is actually slower now, but you are gaining 2+mph in the last 1/8th compared to your old runs. Perhaps you lost some valuable torque with this setup, but gained alittle hp in the process.
Your car is now slower to the 1/8th but faster in the last 1/8th so it would kinda make sense. But it would also mean that you may have lost a substantial amount of torque for it to be so noticeable.
Your car is now slower to the 1/8th but faster in the last 1/8th so it would kinda make sense. But it would also mean that you may have lost a substantial amount of torque for it to be so noticeable.
Originally Posted by davidv
That answers my question. I did not realise that you have a automatic transmission.
Originally Posted by ajcool2
So is that normal with automatic cars or is something wrong?
I drive a manual, and can tell when my numbers are off 1/10 seconds. I can usually assign a cause, like a poor first to second gear shift.
Since I am not familiar with the automatic, I cannot give an educated critique.
Originally Posted by lowtempo
you can try to launch at a higher RPM to compensate for the loss of torque at launch.
Hey, I saw you there yesterday.
There air quality was awful, I'd say wait until you run again before you make any decisions.
seriously, I didn't even feel like it was easy breathing out there in the stands with the mix of the high humidity, tire smoke and exhaust fumes.
There air quality was awful, I'd say wait until you run again before you make any decisions.
seriously, I didn't even feel like it was easy breathing out there in the stands with the mix of the high humidity, tire smoke and exhaust fumes.
Originally Posted by dcmaxclub
Hey, I saw you there yesterday.
There air quality was awful, I'd say wait until you run again before you make any decisions.
seriously, I didn't even feel like it was easy breathing out there in the stands with the mix of the high humidity, tire smoke and exhaust fumes.
There air quality was awful, I'd say wait until you run again before you make any decisions.
seriously, I didn't even feel like it was easy breathing out there in the stands with the mix of the high humidity, tire smoke and exhaust fumes.




