Math Question
Originally posted by Machupo
jeebus...
i might as well go buy a g-meter and test this
gotcha, noted... all we're doing is using the best approximations you can reasonably assume without more data...
get those data and then you can be much more accurate in your calculations, until then....
oh well... the civic got whupped either way
jeebus...
i might as well go buy a g-meter and test this

gotcha, noted... all we're doing is using the best approximations you can reasonably assume without more data...
get those data and then you can be much more accurate in your calculations, until then....
oh well... the civic got whupped either way
a = (vf-v0)/t
350z acceleration = 10.36 ft/s^2
civic acceleration = 8.26 ft/s^2
Also... interesting. measure the distance between a STI and 350z..
STI 13.2 @ 100mph
350z 14.0 @ 102mph
Last edited by Nano; Feb 24, 2005 at 07:50 AM.
Originally posted by Nano
that is largely inacurate, as it assumes acceleration is constant.
which could not be farther from the truth
there is a HUGE difference in acceleration in the firt 200ft, compared to the last 200ft.
that is largely inacurate, as it assumes acceleration is constant.
which could not be farther from the truth
there is a HUGE difference in acceleration in the firt 200ft, compared to the last 200ft.
Assuming acceleration is constant is the ONLY way I'm going to do the caluclation.I'm not going to do intergral calculus to derive a solution with this many unknowns. Heck, can I assume rolling w/o slipping too.

For the guy who asked, I'm a Mechanical Engineer at Lockheed Martin. I'll take my cookie and bolt now... Later!
Last edited by neffster; Feb 24, 2005 at 02:23 PM.
figured you were an ME somewhere...... I am ME too...... except i work in the water industry (equipment manufacturing of water treatment equipment and process design), so i don't get to use my schooling too much, i use civil type stuff all the time though. oh well
Originally posted by neffster
Well it can't be too "largely inacurate" since it is awfully close to the 13 car lengths you stated earlier.
Assuming acceleration is constant is the ONLY way I'm going to do the caluclation.
I'm not going to do intergral calculus to derive a solution with this many unknowns. Heck, can I assume rolling w/o slipping too.
For the guy who asked, I'm a Mechanical Engineer at Lockheed Martin. I'll take my cookie and bolt now... Later!
Well it can't be too "largely inacurate" since it is awfully close to the 13 car lengths you stated earlier.
Assuming acceleration is constant is the ONLY way I'm going to do the caluclation.I'm not going to do intergral calculus to derive a solution with this many unknowns. Heck, can I assume rolling w/o slipping too.

For the guy who asked, I'm a Mechanical Engineer at Lockheed Martin. I'll take my cookie and bolt now... Later!
you can't assume rolling without slippling either! it's a dragrace

J/K
Last edited by Nano; Feb 24, 2005 at 02:49 PM.
I'll reformulate the Q:
What distance did Civic travel in last 1.6s of its run, where ending speed was 88.4mph?
Answer is between 13 and 15 car lengths, depending on cars' CD, wind direction, Civic's gear/rpm/power/torque, etc.
Since we don't know starting speed of Civic (at beginning of 1.6s interval) and we don't know average accel during that time (we need either one), we cannot precisely calc the distance travelled.
Another assumption is that Civic travelled in straight line, but that's prolly true
.
Cheers.
What distance did Civic travel in last 1.6s of its run, where ending speed was 88.4mph?
Answer is between 13 and 15 car lengths, depending on cars' CD, wind direction, Civic's gear/rpm/power/torque, etc.
Since we don't know starting speed of Civic (at beginning of 1.6s interval) and we don't know average accel during that time (we need either one), we cannot precisely calc the distance travelled.
Another assumption is that Civic travelled in straight line, but that's prolly true
.Cheers.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post








