Notices
Engine & Drivetrain VQ Power and Delivery

Eibach springs ARE OUT!?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-11-2002, 03:51 AM
  #21  
Gin262
Registered User
 
Gin262's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: ATL, GA
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by VQracer
Ground-Controls have been out for a while too, but I never posted cause I think they are ___!

Ground-Control calls them coilovers but they are just springs made for looks. True coilovers are designed with the shocks/strut in mind along with other suspension components. Ground-Controls are just adjustable springs that apeal to people who are just going for looks. The ride is horrible. And like Cheston said, they sag over time.
Yeah, Ground-Controls suck... IF you use the stock shock! many amateur race teams use Ground Controls with Koni or better shocks... why? Easy adjustment. And not just ride-height. If you call Ground Control and order from them you can specify the spring-rate you want. Don't like the rate you picked??... get new springs for 50 a pop. Try that with JIC or Tein.

Oh yeah, Ground Control uses Eibach springs... I guess all Eibach's sag.

Having said that... Getting a packaged deal (JIC, Tein, etc.) is probably better for the average (street) driver. But it'll usually be much more expensive.

Blake

EDIT: Found this on Ground-Controls website:

"Springs: All our ride height adjustable kits feature Eibach Springs. these high quality springs offer a lifetime warranty against any defects."

I would assume sagging would be a defect...

Last edited by Gin262; 12-11-2002 at 04:01 AM.
Old 12-11-2002, 01:33 PM
  #22  
J Ritt
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
J Ritt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Charlotte NC
Posts: 1,113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

So I haven't seen one mention of the actual change in spring rate from stock to the eibachs...why in the world would you consider buying springs (or any setup for that matter) if you don't know how these springs will affect handling? Is it just so the car sits lower? Doesn't it matter if you bounce down the highway on the springs without compressing the shocks?
cabalisticfire, thank you for the sane reply.
Old 12-11-2002, 02:48 PM
  #23  
Fyrestrike
Registered User
 
Fyrestrike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Miami, Florida
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

In my experience with Eibachs they all sag. For the Grand Prix they had to release a revised set because the fronts were a full 1.5" higher then the back. Even with the revised springs the drop is still uneven.
Old 12-11-2002, 03:55 PM
  #24  
wadd3456
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
wadd3456's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Burlington, NC
Posts: 1,076
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Interesting. My only complaint with Eibachs is that they DONT always drop as MUCH as they say they do. This would be the opposite of a sag issue.

Intrax on the other hand keeps dropping and dropping and dropping.....
Old 12-11-2002, 06:37 PM
  #25  
Thunderbolt
Charter Member #88
 
Thunderbolt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Nashville,Tn
Posts: 236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by Gin262 h yeah, Ground Control uses Eibach springs... I guess all Eibach's sag.

I would assume sagging would be a defect... [/B]
All springs will sag/fatigue to some amount. Some more than others. This is why it is important we can set the camber on our cars. Sagging springs will cause the insides of the tires to wear.
Old 12-12-2002, 03:58 PM
  #26  
jreiter
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
jreiter's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: san luis obispo, ca
Posts: 1,580
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by Thunderbolt
This is why it is important we can set the camber on our cars. Sagging springs will cause the insides of the tires to wear.

If you have adjustable-height suspension, just raise it up a bit to compensate for the sagging springs. Generally, a spring will only sag a certain amount during an initial break-in period. After that, it's probably safe to adjust the height (if you have that ability) and be done with it.

If you don't have threaded coilovers, some shocks (such as Bilsteins) have slotted mounts for the spring perches, allowing you to make limited adjustments to height. Not as fine-tunable as threaded coilovers, but still useable if your springs sag too much.
Old 12-13-2002, 10:49 AM
  #27  
Gin262
Registered User
 
Gin262's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: ATL, GA
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by Thunderbolt
All springs will sag/fatigue to some amount. Some more than others. This is why it is important we can set the camber on our cars. Sagging springs will cause the insides of the tires to wear.
True... I suppose I meant excessive sagging would (should?) be a defect.

Blake
Old 12-16-2002, 11:04 AM
  #28  
Driven
Registered User
 
Driven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 546
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Response regarding one of the above posts about putting additional weight in the trunk in order to get a "feel" of what to expect with Eibach springs. I'm the first to admit I don't have experience in this area, but the physics seem backwards on the example. If I put more weight in my car now and the ride smooths out....how in the hell does that translate into the same type of ride with the same shocks and stiffer springs??? When I went to stiffer springs in a Wrangler I had...and kept the shocks the same, I had to put the weight in after the change to get the same kind of ride as before. This is consistant with logic for me: stiffer springs with more weight = softer springs with lighter weight.
Old 12-16-2002, 12:21 PM
  #29  
z461
Registered User
 
z461's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 808
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by Driven
Response regarding one of the above posts about putting additional weight in the trunk in order to get a "feel" of what to expect with Eibach springs. I'm the first to admit I don't have experience in this area, but the physics seem backwards on the example. If I put more weight in my car now and the ride smooths out....how in the hell does that translate into the same type of ride with the same shocks and stiffer springs??? When I went to stiffer springs in a Wrangler I had...and kept the shocks the same, I had to put the weight in after the change to get the same kind of ride as before. This is consistant with logic for me: stiffer springs with more weight = softer springs with lighter weight.
The logic was that if you compressed the stock springs with more weight in the rear, then they acted like higher rate springs with less compression. When more weight was put in the rear of my car w/ stock springs/shocks, the car rode better. Therefore if my logic is correct (it could be wrong) I think that stiffer/shorter springs would make the ride better or at least reduce the amount of porpoising @ certain speeds.
Old 12-16-2002, 02:39 PM
  #30  
wadd3456
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
wadd3456's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Burlington, NC
Posts: 1,076
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It says yours are on ORDER? PLease PM me about that.
Old 12-16-2002, 07:18 PM
  #31  
Driven
Registered User
 
Driven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 546
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I kind of understand what you are saying...but don't agree with the analogy. I don't experience any "porpoising" in my current stock ride...it is however very "bumpy" like I would expect from a stiff performance suspension. When you use the word porpoising I think of how any car would ride when it's shocks are shot ie. you push down hard on the bumper and let go and the car bounces numerous times to come back to static condition. If this is what you are experiencing, then I agree...shorter/stiffer springs will reduce this characteristic...but will not ride at all like your stock suspension under load. IMO that simulation is similar to making a Corvette into a Cadillac. The heavier weight in my eyes would promoat the "floating" feeling over bumps.....anyway, that's my take. Doesn't much matter...buy em and tell us your opinion afterward.
Old 12-16-2002, 10:37 PM
  #32  
z461
Registered User
 
z461's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 808
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by Driven
I kind of understand what you are saying...but don't agree with the analogy. I don't experience any "porpoising" in my current stock ride...it is however very "bumpy" like I would expect from a stiff performance suspension. When you use the word porpoising I think of how any car would ride when it's shocks are shot ie. you push down hard on the bumper and let go and the car bounces numerous times to come back to static condition. If this is what you are experiencing, then I agree...shorter/stiffer springs will reduce this characteristic...but will not ride at all like your stock suspension under load. IMO that simulation is similar to making a Corvette into a Cadillac. The heavier weight in my eyes would promoat the "floating" feeling over bumps.....anyway, that's my take. Doesn't much matter...buy em and tell us your opinion afterward.
Oh ok... i see what you're saying, makes sense if it was a lot of weight, but I merely put about 40-50 lbs of stuff in the trunk I believe. So it's NOT like I added 2-3 hundred lbs of stuff to make the car heavier and basically ride over the bumps... Also, porpoising if you search is a condition in the Z where the car's rear will bounce up and down over certain roads excessively at speeds between 45-75mph... This was determined by several people who analyzed the suspension (and they could be wrong) to be caused by the shocks being valved too heavily for the stock spring rates.
Old 12-17-2002, 07:03 AM
  #33  
Driven
Registered User
 
Driven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 546
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Everyone is going to blast me on this....I can hear it now. But.....you mean there is a solution to my not being able to drink coffee in my Z on the way to work? (banter in the background, "you shouldn't have bought a Z if you wanted to drink coffee....it's a sports car!")

Honestly if what you are talking about may provide a better street ride without losing and maybe improving track performance....sign me up!
Old 12-18-2002, 03:55 AM
  #34  
MR RIZK
New Member
iTrader: (7)
 
MR RIZK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,225
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

FYI

H&R have brought out a set of springs for the 350z. If you want something that sits lower that the Eibachs then the H&R's might be for you.

Eibachs
Front 0.8"
Rear 1.2"

H&R
Front 1.5"
Rear 1.5"

http://www.hrsprings.com
Old 12-18-2002, 06:26 AM
  #35  
Driven
Registered User
 
Driven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 546
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Someone buy them, install them, and report back to us....please.
Old 12-18-2002, 08:12 AM
  #36  
wadd3456
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
wadd3456's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Burlington, NC
Posts: 1,076
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Man that would look nice with some 19s tucked up there.
Old 12-20-2002, 07:46 AM
  #37  
datspeed77
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
datspeed77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: San Diego
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by dczoner


I would tend to think that Eibach has had a few months to play around with the G35/FM platform, and then figured out how to toss that the Z's direction. Not much to springs, really, once they've got the tools it just takes a little trial and error to get the right mix.

Interesting that it gives a .8" front and 1.2" rear drop (if I'm reading this right). . . Seems awful low for just a spring set, and also I wonder if the .4" difference is noticable.

Also FYI, they do have a G35 kit as well, 1.1" drop all around.
You guys might want to wait for the H&R springs. Supposedly it should lower the car by 1.5" all the way around. At least that's what my dealer price sheet lists. But, they're not out yet.
Old 12-20-2002, 10:51 AM
  #38  
johnlotusboy
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
johnlotusboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Bellingham WA.
Posts: 648
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

H&R springs are not out yet, the prototypes will be arriving in the first week of Jan. and I will be testing them on my car for them. Today (20 Dec.) we are doing the first of the testing on a stock car at 2pm PST at H&R to verify original #'s on the stock suspension.
I will post pictures and info this evening after I get home.
H&R is in my home town of Bellingham, WA. Nice to have people like that in my home town.
Old 12-20-2002, 01:28 PM
  #39  
wadd3456
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
wadd3456's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Burlington, NC
Posts: 1,076
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Dont go out and measure/test it the second you drop it. It takes sometimes up to 3 days for a car to fully lower. I bet you 20bux it doesnt drop more then 1/2" when you first do it. Then tomorrow you will walk out and look at it and say "wtf!"

Also, what are you doing about your camber?!


Quick Reply: Eibach springs ARE OUT!?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:13 AM.