Notices
Engine & Drivetrain VQ Power and Delivery

05 "High Rev" Motors.. +18wHP +22/29wTQ!? - A Thanks To Tony, Motordyne Engineering

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 12, 2005 | 07:28 PM
  #201  
ROGUELITE's Avatar
ROGUELITE
the Zbler eLf
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 999
Likes: 1
From: Ashburn, VA
Default

Originally Posted by Hydrazine
Its $487 for the Iso Thermal MREV. There are options like the modified collector $100 or the Copper TB heater $70.

And even though the website isn't up yet, they are shipping out now. Just give me a PM for more info.

In fact, several have been sent out to G35 drivers on the G35 board.

Several independant reviews have already come in and all of them are . Independant dynos will be comming very soon too.

So far, one 350Z owner (Diesel350) has made a purchase with the $100 discount to get it installed on the dyno. And he will post his results.

So there are two more $100 discounts to anybody who can get MREV installed while on the dyno and pre/post tested.

Tony
Tony, as usual you are the man my friend. Don't have a revvup, but looking
forward to your future mods. Installed my 5/16 spacer not too long ago and
love it. Keep up the great work and research!
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2005 | 08:46 PM
  #202  
Hydrazine's Avatar
Hydrazine
MOTORDYNE-MY350Z SPONSOR
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,399
Likes: 9
From: L.A. California
Default

Gines has just signed up for #2!

--- A New dyno plot just came in on the G35 board. I didn't know AzSi22 was going to get his dynod, but here it is.

MREV in RED


Last edited by Hydrazine; Nov 12, 2005 at 08:49 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2005 | 01:48 AM
  #203  
TiPIACE's Avatar
TiPIACE
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 938
Likes: 0
From: aus
Default

Originally Posted by Hydrazine
Its $487 for the Iso Thermal MREV. There are options like the modified collector $100 or the Copper TB heater $70.
im a bit confused Tony

so its $487 for a Nissan oem 287hp lower collector with the iso thermal plates and 5/16" spacer?

Last edited by TiPIACE; Nov 13, 2005 at 01:56 AM.
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2005 | 08:23 AM
  #204  
Hydrazine's Avatar
Hydrazine
MOTORDYNE-MY350Z SPONSOR
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,399
Likes: 9
From: L.A. California
Default

Yep. That's it.
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2005 | 03:09 PM
  #205  
thawk408's Avatar
thawk408
Registered User
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,939
Likes: 0
From: Nashville, TN
Default

Originally Posted by Hydrazine
Gines has just signed up for #2!

--- A New dyno plot just came in on the G35 board. I didn't know AzSi22 was going to get his dynod, but here it is.

MREV in RED

Why did he not rev to the limiter on the second run? I might know why.....
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2005 | 03:14 PM
  #206  
undrgnd's Avatar
undrgnd
New Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,203
Likes: 1
From: MD
Default

why don't you just keep it to yourself then. i'm sick and tired of all the childish secret bs on this forum. i'm done with it.
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2005 | 03:17 PM
  #207  
thawk408's Avatar
thawk408
Registered User
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,939
Likes: 0
From: Nashville, TN
Default

Originally Posted by undrgnd
why don't you just keep it to yourself then. i'm sick and tired of all the childish secret bs on this forum. i'm done with it.
Im not keeping anything a secret. If you would pay attention and read everything you would know exactly why. I am guessing that he did not rev it to the revlimiter becuase there would be a bigger loss to show.
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2005 | 04:12 PM
  #208  
racin's Avatar
racin
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 272
Likes: 0
From: Winter Haven, Florida
Default

While I think the mod is a good one based on the entire curve, I think it is misleading to call it a 15 HP mod. Most people, who do not understand the 15 HP was picked up at a certain point in the dyno plot, will assume that they simply can now say that they make an additional 15 HP on top of their peak. To illustrate: If my car makes 240 peak HP on the dyno, I might buy this mod, expecting to see my WHP jump up to 255 at some point in the curve. I think this is a grey area that allows for misrepresentation. I'm not sure how you SHOULD represent it, only that it really can mislead a person who doesn't know better...

I think the thought process and the work done on this were very good, and the result is evident by the dyno plot. This is a great mod for just about anybody with the Rev-Up engine to do, unless you are somehow stuck on wanting to spin the engine higher, even though it actually equals less performance. The power curve difference is where the speed is at...
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2005 | 04:30 PM
  #209  
AzSi22's Avatar
AzSi22
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
From: Tucson, AZ
Default

Originally Posted by thawk408
Im not keeping anything a secret. If you would pay attention and read everything you would know exactly why. I am guessing that he did not rev it to the revlimiter becuase there would be a bigger loss to show.
Uhm, no. The stock tach indicated 7K on the dyno, but it seems as though its off by a few hundred RPMs (which is pretty common in most cars). If you are wondering, it was I that drove the car on the dyno. I've made over 200 runs on this dyno in various cars. The tech that was at the shop was getting ready to leave, so I didn't want to kill the rest of his night with me having to make another 3 runs when I didn't feel it was necessary. Tony has already stated that the trade off for the midrange is power dropping off more than a stock 05.

Last edited by AzSi22; Nov 13, 2005 at 05:16 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2005 | 04:31 PM
  #210  
Loic's Avatar
Loic
New Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
From: Pasadena, CA
Default

Originally Posted by thawk408
Im not keeping anything a secret. If you would pay attention and read everything you would know exactly why. I am guessing that he did not rev it to the revlimiter becuase there would be a bigger loss to show.
Talking about paying attention, why is the gear ratio slightly different between the two pulls??

LOIC
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2005 | 04:34 PM
  #211  
AzSi22's Avatar
AzSi22
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
From: Tucson, AZ
Default

Originally Posted by Loic
Talking about paying attention, why is the gear ratio slightly different between the two pulls??

LOIC
I believe this is something the dynojet does since it works off how fast the drum is spinning. .02 in difference doesn't account for any differences.
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2005 | 07:30 PM
  #212  
thawk408's Avatar
thawk408
Registered User
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,939
Likes: 0
From: Nashville, TN
Default

Originally Posted by AzSi22
I believe this is something the dynojet does since it works off how fast the drum is spinning. .02 in difference doesn't account for any differences.
Correct. It is not the actual gear ratio.
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2005 | 07:34 PM
  #213  
thawk408's Avatar
thawk408
Registered User
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,939
Likes: 0
From: Nashville, TN
Default

Originally Posted by AzSi22
Uhm, no. The stock tach indicated 7K on the dyno, but it seems as though its off by a few hundred RPMs (which is pretty common in most cars). If you are wondering, it was I that drove the car on the dyno. I've made over 200 runs on this dyno in various cars. The tech that was at the shop was getting ready to leave, so I didn't want to kill the rest of his night with me having to make another 3 runs when I didn't feel it was necessary. Tony has already stated that the trade off for the midrange is power dropping off more than a stock 05.
Hmmm. Doesnt seem off to be, when the curves follow eachother. Is this with the spacer? I already know about this mods power gains and loses.

Last edited by thawk408; Nov 13, 2005 at 07:40 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2005 | 07:40 PM
  #214  
AzSi22's Avatar
AzSi22
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
From: Tucson, AZ
Default

The stock tach and the RPM pickup on the dyno are 2 different things. The RPM on the graph is correct. The new run is only under by 200 RPMs, I just didn't take the car to fuel cutoff. I really don't think 200 RPM's is worth worrying about in this case, since we are looking more at the midrange, than peak HP since we already knew it would drop off.
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2005 | 07:44 PM
  #215  
thawk408's Avatar
thawk408
Registered User
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,939
Likes: 0
From: Nashville, TN
Default

Originally Posted by AzSi22
The stock tach and the RPM pickup on the dyno are 2 different things. The RPM on the graph is correct. The new run is only under by 200 RPMs, I just didn't take the car to fuel cutoff. I really don't think 200 RPM's is worth worrying about in this case, since we are looking more at the midrange, than peak HP since we already knew it would drop off.
You might aswell take it to redline and look at total performance gained and losed.
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2005 | 07:48 PM
  #216  
thawk408's Avatar
thawk408
Registered User
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,939
Likes: 0
From: Nashville, TN
Default

Originally Posted by Diesel350
That part you tested wasn't modified and that's probably why you didn't get the same results. Do you not believe the 2 Dyno's that were already posted?
In modified do you mean that we didnt have his spacer? We used the 287hp motors lower plenum along with the Crawford upper plenum. MD was not telling anyone what the secret mod was and Doug thought he knew what it was, so we went and tested it out.
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2005 | 08:04 PM
  #217  
Diesel350's Avatar
Diesel350
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 8,378
Likes: 1
From: Tampa
Default

Originally Posted by thawk408
In modified do you mean that we didnt have his spacer? We used the 287hp motors lower plenum along with the Crawford upper plenum. MD was not telling anyone what the secret mod was and Doug thought he knew what it was, so we went and tested it out.
No, not just the spacer. The modified lower plenum has had the top lumps of runners 1&2 machined down.
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2005 | 08:19 PM
  #218  
AzSi22's Avatar
AzSi22
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
From: Tucson, AZ
Default

Just to clarify also, I believe I received the modified lower plenum. It had the runners machined down.
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2005 | 08:38 PM
  #219  
thawk408's Avatar
thawk408
Registered User
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,939
Likes: 0
From: Nashville, TN
Default

Originally Posted by AzSi22
Just to clarify also, I believe I received the modified lower plenum. It had the runners machined down.
I am pretty sure that doesnt make a flip of difference. Someone prove me wrong becuase if it does then mine will be done tomm.
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2005 | 08:50 PM
  #220  
24v GTI Guy's Avatar
24v GTI Guy
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
From: Pasadena, CA
Default

Thankyou Hydrazine for the clarification you made, I now have a much gfreater understanding of the product. Now if I were to combinea CAI i.e. the Injen with this mod, would that help improve the peak # and lessen the dramatic drop off it has above 6.5k?
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:43 PM.