Notices
Engine & Drivetrain VQ Power and Delivery
View Poll Results: 350Z Twin-Turbo vs. SuperCharger?
Stock - I like it the Way it Is.
20
8.40%
Nitrous - Cheap HP, But Hey I'm Cheap.
13
5.46%
Supercharged - Modest HP Gain, for a modest amount of $$.
79
33.19%
Twin-Turbo - I'm all about the HP!!! Where's that Credit Card?
105
44.12%
Naturally Aspirated
21
8.82%
Voters: 238. You may not vote on this poll

SC vs. Turbo vs. Nitrous vs. Stock

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 5, 2003 | 04:11 PM
  #21  
TJZ's Avatar
TJZ
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 806
Likes: 1
From: Gainesville, Florida
Default

Originally posted by Slareau02
Also, I want to know how you plan on building a 500hp N/A vq35de. That would be interesting. You also seem to forget that if you add a TT setup to a car it doesn't suddenly lose all the power that it had before. Aside from a small increase in backpressure you don't lose power. So the same power that was there coming out of your 3rd gear turn or whatever you said would still be there as a stock N/A. You also make it seem like people want to throw a single t-88 turbo on the 350z. Thats not what people are talking about doing. Most people would want two medium to small, quick spooling turbos.
exactly (to both of the things you said)
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2003 | 05:06 PM
  #22  
Zthirtythree's Avatar
Zthirtythree
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
From: la la land
Default

wait....

you are a 16 year old with a Z3? do you know what a boost spike feels like from a 400Hp sr20det silvia? a boost spike is a big deal especally when you vehicle is dynamic. during your green light spurts to the speed limit and even the quarter mile, your car is under relatively mild forces and virtually no lateral dynamic. introduce a turn and everything changes. you may be able to correct for your loss of tration most of the time but sometimes you wont, then what?

read any review for the older z32, the NA was preferred by almost everyone over the TT because it was predictable.

if you are talking about motorsports, IRL mind as well be NASCAR and WRC, while very cool , is hardly roadracing. THERE ARNT MANY ROADS! the technique to racing events like rallye and even Japanese drifting competitons is to get the car to oversteer. lack of traction allows a certian amount of forgiveness. i will let them do it, i prefer not to be sliding back and forth.
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2003 | 10:35 AM
  #23  
Zthirtythree's Avatar
Zthirtythree
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
From: la la land
Default

lets squash this.

it seems thats too many people take little things like this thread personally. i dont mean to offend anyone personally, and i take back that Z3 comment steve. dont be mad.

my point was merely that the z33 was built to be a sweet road car... be careful what you do to yours. peace.
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2003 | 12:14 PM
  #24  
importriders's Avatar
importriders
New Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 829
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA
Default

Originally posted by Zthirtythree
lets squash this.

it seems thats too many people take little things like this thread personally. i dont mean to offend anyone personally, and i take back that Z3 comment steve. dont be mad.

my point was merely that the z33 was built to be a sweet road car... be careful what you do to yours. peace.
Ditto, to many people taking things personally. It's a message board.
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2003 | 04:11 PM
  #25  
Slareau02's Avatar
Slareau02
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 245
Likes: 0
From: Charlotte, NC
Default

Don't worry, I'm not offended by anyhting in this thread. Yeah I realize I drive a Z3, and yes (sigh) it is an overpowered miata, but its still fun, and I did learn the dynamics of a real wheel drive car. Not to mention, you didn't really attack the Z3 anywase. But my Z33 will be here in a month so I'll be moving up a bit.
One thing though, with good hardware how often are those boost spikes going to occur? Probaly not that often. And about those drivers that perfer the N/A z32 versus the Z32 TT, I wonder who set the quicker lap time...
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2003 | 06:37 PM
  #26  
94 TA GT's Avatar
94 TA GT
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
From: FARGO!!
Default

I would take 400 N/A hp over 400 boosted HP ANY day, for any apllication. The only problem is it isn't as easily done, or as simple as a SC or turbo, or N20. As for SC's, Centerfugal ones are a great combination of reliability, and low temp, and high hp. Roots style super chargerscan get REALLY hot, BUT, they can produce ALOT of hp and even more so, big Torque, which is mostly flat accross the power band. Turbo's...Lag, heat, but reliability and MASSIVE peak hp numbers. N20= TQ!!! defenetly best suited for drag racing, and for good reason. It all depends on the application, and what you are looking for in your car.
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2003 | 03:37 PM
  #27  
BMW-KC's Avatar
BMW-KC
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
From: Venice
Default Supercharged.

I purchased the Downing Atlanta Supercharger for my Z3.

All that I really wanted was more zip in my day to day driveability.

The great thing about the supercharger in my setup is that it added 80hp.

Dyno tested the torque I used to get at 4800rpms I now get at 2400 RPMs

This is great because when the red light turns green my car is off and going rather effortlessly and quiet.

Before to get the same results would have resulted in a rather high RPM rev which just calls attention to my car and made me look like I was trying to race people.

I am happy with the supercharer setup because it is a low maintenance setup and I installed it myself. Makes daily drivability more pleasurable cause I dont make alot of noise but just in case someone wants to race I just rev it up to 4200MPS drop the clutch and KAZAAM.

I am looking to get into a 350z for the 6speed.

Or maybe a Z4 for the 6speed (which I like the looks of even though alot don't) but the 350z for almost $20,000 less then the Z4 would leave room for alot o mods.
Attached Thumbnails SC vs. Turbo vs. Nitrous vs. Stock-hmn2.jpg  
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2003 | 02:36 PM
  #28  
2003z33's Avatar
2003z33
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
From: VA BCH VA
Default

I have a 50 shot of NOS going in next week. The turbos are in the planning stages. Ill keep you posted on the NOS and hopefully some pics..
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2003 | 07:23 PM
  #29  
12SecZ's Avatar
12SecZ
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,686
Likes: 0
From: NOR - CAL
Default 2003z33

What kit are you going with and where are you going to put the bottle?

I have some ideas for a 75 shot wet kit from NX with the bottle mounted underneath the STB. 600 bucks.

I would mount my switches in the open NAV area I am not using.
If I go Nitrous this time it will include a remote bottle opener and purge. If your gonna do it do it right I say. Probably have 3 0r 4 switches.

WOT,ON/Warmer/Purge/Opener.... 4 switches.

My sub box takes up the space before the STB and I need the area behind the STB for work gear.

Comments?
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2003 | 07:39 PM
  #30  
2003z33's Avatar
2003z33
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
From: VA BCH VA
Default

MaxHax

Going NOS 50 Shot and will move up from there. I will have a Purge valve, Bottle Warmer, Bottle Opener and Guage . I havent decided on where we are gonna put the Bottle. But as for the buttons, only 3, arm/ Purge/ and bottle opener in the ashtray ( or where the ashtray is). The WOT switch is most likely gonna be custom under the pedal...As for the Gauge, i want to use the NAV cubby also..I plan to add other gauges in the future...
Anyway..Let me know what you think

Mike
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2003 | 08:14 PM
  #31  
12SecZ's Avatar
12SecZ
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,686
Likes: 0
From: NOR - CAL
Default

Thanks for the info,

I had a friend add a 50 shot to his V6 (not a Z) and he wasn't impressed, in fact he was disapointed. He added the 75 HP jets and was like WOO Hoo!

It seems like that extra 25 HP really makes a difference. I think the engine would be fine with a 75 shot.

Are you going wet or dry and what brand?

I am seriuosly considering this. It only stresses the engine when you use it, FI is always on.

Cost for me will be about 1k for everything. Are you going to add a blow down tube? If so is there a spot for it? It's a NHRA must if you drag.

I just started leaning this way recently so I haven't done much research.

I'm gonna run a purge line up in front of the windshield though.

It rocks to be sitting at a light bext to someone and purge NO2 up in front of your car!

HISSSSSSS!



Edit add, just saw the "NOS" do you have a part number and is it for our Z's?
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2003 | 06:00 AM
  #32  
Zaphod 350z's Avatar
Zaphod 350z
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
From: NYC
Default

What kind of kit are you going with 2003z33? You mentioned a jet so i assume you are getting a single Y jet to be installed in the intake pipe? I'm going to a pro shop on saturday and they are specing out a direct port system for me. I can let you know what they say, you might want to go that route instead. Direct port is a lot safer, more consistent, and requires less nitrous for the same power.
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2003 | 10:43 AM
  #33  
12SecZ's Avatar
12SecZ
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,686
Likes: 0
From: NOR - CAL
Default I agree about direct port

Plus you can use a CAI too correct?
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2003 | 06:41 AM
  #34  
2003z33's Avatar
2003z33
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
From: VA BCH VA
Default

Originally posted by Zaphod 350z
What kind of kit are you going with 2003z33? You mentioned a jet so i assume you are getting a single Y jet to be installed in the intake pipe? I'm going to a pro shop on saturday and they are specing out a direct port system for me. I can let you know what they say, you might want to go that route instead. Direct port is a lot safer, more consistent, and requires less nitrous for the same power.
Yes I agree. Did you get a price for direct port? I am currently in the planning stages for twin turbos. We will be using the skylines Intercooler and I believe HKS Wastegate and BlowOffValves. Im not going to go all the way with the nitrous at this time. For now we will squeeze at the TB (WET) with a 50 or 75 shot. Mostlikely the NOS will be relocated to cool the intercoooler. We are hoping to be done by May or June. Our shop will have a booth at the import show in VA BCH in June. So, if everything goes well then the Z should be there along with the Honda Civic that boosts @ 28PSI. We will see.
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2003 | 06:45 AM
  #35  
2003z33's Avatar
2003z33
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
From: VA BCH VA
Default Re: 2003z33

Originally posted by MaxHax
What kit are you going with and where are you going to put the bottle?


Comments?
I dont have the KIT Number but I know we will be dealing with NOS. We would have gone with NX but our prices are better with NOS.
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2003 | 06:36 AM
  #37  
Ben Davis's Avatar
Ben Davis
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
From: Buckeye country
Default NOS

NOS cause it causes no more wear and tear than boost when running it and you have the power to completely turn it off and cause NO waer and tear (outside of norm) for DD, with a remote bottle opener you are set for street light encounters.

Other observations
Turbos gett hotter than SC'c always, dosent make them less reliable!

Turbos are very consistent in spool barring a leaky waste gate or BOV, i have a freind with a 425WHP MKIV and he never had boost spike running 18PSI

the diference in power between a turbo and a SC can eb very neglidgable is you pick = psi and = cfm especially because exit temps from a SC are normally much lower, although it does take tq to turn the blower

do not forget that a turbine stlye sc Vs. a positive displacement changes the way the car reacts with SC as well

NOS can make just as much power as any other form of FI if not MORE and more safely, NOS actually cools the intake stream reducing potential knock...... goodness jucie rules

Ben
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2003 | 01:52 PM
  #38  
Fanman's Avatar
Fanman
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
From: Glendale, CA
Default

Originally posted by porschefanatic
i have a supercharged 911 making over 425 hp and a turbo wrx with over 280. both types of fi have their own characteristics. i've driver a turbo 911(tt 1999 and tt 2002) and they are excellent STREET vehicle that would hand anyones *** to them if they thought otherwise. the sc in the 911 is a kit and is very well designed. this is in a car that if there was too much heat, you'd definitely know it. we are talking about a car that has no direct airflow to the engine. i had to put a large intercooler with a whale tail, and a large oil cooler behind the front spoiler on it for my peace of mind. what i'm trying to say is, both work well IF implemented well. don't buy from a fly-by-night manufacturer.
They didn't make a twin turbo in 1999, they ceased production of the 993 TT in 97' and did not produce the 996 TT until 2001. Also there are currently only 2 SC kits for the 996/911 one is By Design and retails for $17K installed (not designed for the 02' and up 3.6 L), the other has not been released is by TPC and will be $10K. Because of the M96 engine block design there has been massive problems with supercharging/turbocharging 911 cars (not named TT, GT2, or GT3). Unless you are driving a previous 993 or older version there really isn't a way to SC/TC the 911.
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2003 | 03:15 PM
  #39  
GaryK's Avatar
GaryK
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 531
Likes: 1
From: ---
Default

There are others besides those two you mention Fanman. The one that comes to mind as being somewhat reputable is Supercharging of Knoxville. They have supercharger setups for multiple generations of the 911 and its engine variants, but I think most of their stuff is for the 964 and previous gens.


Now, as far as the "predictability" of turbocharged power...if everything is working properly I would not say it is unpredictable. That said, I'd still choose NA power over equal FI power because it is almost always more driveable . What I mean by that is it's easier to turn consistently fast laps with the NA setup. I've had seat time with both NA and FI on track/autocross, and that's just my experience with it. When the power curve is peaky, as it often is with FI, it is harder to fully utilize that power consistently.

Oh, and my vote for making fairly substantial power in my 350z goes to centrifugal supercharger. Its too hard to make the power I'd like to have while staying NA on this motor. And I feel that the SC setup is a little simpler, a little more reliable than than a turbo setup.
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2003 | 09:43 PM
  #40  
Fanman's Avatar
Fanman
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
From: Glendale, CA
Default

Originally posted by GaryK
There are others besides those two you mention Fanman. The one that comes to mind as being somewhat reputable is Supercharging of Knoxville. They have supercharger setups for multiple generations of the 911 and its engine variants, but I think most of their stuff is for the 964 and previous gens.
Previous Porsche gens are more "acceptable" to heavy mods. The 996 has pretty much reached the engine's max. potential (3.6 L) there is a rumor that 3.8 is about it for the flat 6. I have never heard of the outfit you mentioned (though I am on the west coast). They aren't in any major Porsche publications. The 996 is based on the M96 engine not the GT1 (as the TT, GT3, GT2) those can handle 800+ hp. The regular 911 engine maxes out at about 350 hp, and many of the outfits trying to SC/TC the engine have been blowing engines. Their are outfits that TC regular 911's to 500-520 hp but that requires new rod, pistons, block strengthening, etc. that cost about $40K-$50K for about 520 hp. Let's hope the 350Z has a more robust engine that can handle the SC or TT setup without major modifications.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:52 PM.