Dumb fking questions.
10-26-2005, 05:25 PM
#21
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Escondido
Posts: 11,373
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Brandon@Forged
It does make sense and I did not take it personal. I can't stand it when I realize something that was completely obvious if thought out...and I don't take the time to. 
LOL...well thats what we are here for right to learn...
10-26-2005, 07:14 PM
#22
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,235
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Okay glad you guys figured that out..
Now back to my original retarded programming: I've been told by a pro tuner that an uber-flowing plenum a-la-APS is a waste of money on an FI application because the turbos already force the air down the manifolds. The benefit of "bigger, better flowing" is thus defeated, unlike N/A applications. Does this sound right ?
And to confirm my understanding of the original answers. If I have cams that do not overlap and keep the air in longer (and are thus better for F/I), then for the same amount of boost from the turbochargers I can generate more HP, correct ?
Now back to my original retarded programming: I've been told by a pro tuner that an uber-flowing plenum a-la-APS is a waste of money on an FI application because the turbos already force the air down the manifolds. The benefit of "bigger, better flowing" is thus defeated, unlike N/A applications. Does this sound right ?
And to confirm my understanding of the original answers. If I have cams that do not overlap and keep the air in longer (and are thus better for F/I), then for the same amount of boost from the turbochargers I can generate more HP, correct ?
10-26-2005, 07:31 PM
#23
Sponsor
Forged Internals.com
Forged Internals.com
Originally Posted by slay2k
Okay glad you guys figured that out..
Now back to my original retarded programming: I've been told by a pro tuner that an uber-flowing plenum a-la-APS is a waste of money on an FI application because the turbos already force the air down the manifolds. The benefit of "bigger, better flowing" is thus defeated, unlike N/A applications. Does this sound right ?
And to confirm my understanding of the original answers. If I have cams that do not overlap and keep the air in longer (and are thus better for F/I), then for the same amount of boost from the turbochargers I can generate more HP, correct ?
Now back to my original retarded programming: I've been told by a pro tuner that an uber-flowing plenum a-la-APS is a waste of money on an FI application because the turbos already force the air down the manifolds. The benefit of "bigger, better flowing" is thus defeated, unlike N/A applications. Does this sound right ?
And to confirm my understanding of the original answers. If I have cams that do not overlap and keep the air in longer (and are thus better for F/I), then for the same amount of boost from the turbochargers I can generate more HP, correct ?
Regardless, numerous dynometer pulls prove his theory wrong in almost every turbocharged car's situation.
Last edited by Brandon@Forged; 10-26-2005 at 07:40 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
