My Progress with Cipher (charts included)
#21
With good 93-octane gasoline, 2 degrees should not be an issue, and there is a knock sensor there. With FI would be different story. But once with half a tank of 91-octane (Sunoco mistake) I received P0303 on the road and once with bad 93-octane (corn?) I had P0300 while on Pocono track. So now that you have Cipher watch out which one of the California finest gasoline you will be pouring into your tank
Cats will probably lean you out more than plenum.
Cats will probably lean you out more than plenum.
#22
We only get 91oct around here. And 100, but that's like $5.75/gallon. You lucky bastid, with the 93
I have some updates with cipher.....
I reset the fuel maps and did some more runs. Next step: install cats (hopefully this week) and do some more runs. Then, tune.
It looks like the reset did not really touch any of the open-loop fueling (after 4k rpm), but as you can see the timing is different by about 1 degree and it's really lean early on in the closed loop part.
I have some updates with cipher.....
I reset the fuel maps and did some more runs. Next step: install cats (hopefully this week) and do some more runs. Then, tune.
It looks like the reset did not really touch any of the open-loop fueling (after 4k rpm), but as you can see the timing is different by about 1 degree and it's really lean early on in the closed loop part.
Last edited by Wired 24/7; 09-11-2006 at 01:22 AM.
#23
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Germany
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I find it strange that timing goes up at over 6k rpm... shouldn't it be going down? And then I remember the issue with non-revup engines using the MREV2 + 5/16 spacer when the power fell below stock - incidentally also at >6k rpm. Anyone care to comment?
#24
Wired 24/7, you keep repeating about close-loop part and open-loop part, both at WOT, I assume. Is that a fact? Ever since I get the Cipher I was suspecting this and it was only explanation I have why would ECU cut the fuel at ~3450 rpm on my second chart in post #15. Is 4K rpm ECU border of closed/open loop at WOT, as per cams curve? None of this is in the service manual and contradicts with what is written about WOT and open loop there.
All intake cams logs that I have seen, angle went up to 37-38 degrees at 2K rpm, stayed there until 4K rpm and then gradually fall down to –2 degrees at 6K rpm and then stayed there until rev. limit. Shouldn’t ideal intake cams curve be like a straight line from 45 (?) degrees at 2K rpm falling down to -2 degrees at rev. limit?
Silo, do I remember correctly, you have NA Z with 300+ HP on the wheels?
Above 6K rpm intake cams are stable at around -2 degrees and injectors pulse is NOT raising, so I think you are right about ignition timing. I never spotted this.
I must have missed that post about loosing power on non-RevUp above 6K, please provide pointer if not too much trouble. Thanks
Can someone please suggest me a good book on NA tuning? Thanks
All intake cams logs that I have seen, angle went up to 37-38 degrees at 2K rpm, stayed there until 4K rpm and then gradually fall down to –2 degrees at 6K rpm and then stayed there until rev. limit. Shouldn’t ideal intake cams curve be like a straight line from 45 (?) degrees at 2K rpm falling down to -2 degrees at rev. limit?
Originally Posted by Silo
I find it strange that timing goes up at over 6k rpm... shouldn't it be going down? And then I remember the issue with non-revup engines using the MREV2 + 5/16 spacer when the power fell below stock - incidentally also at >6k rpm. Anyone care to comment?
Above 6K rpm intake cams are stable at around -2 degrees and injectors pulse is NOT raising, so I think you are right about ignition timing. I never spotted this.
I must have missed that post about loosing power on non-RevUp above 6K, please provide pointer if not too much trouble. Thanks
Can someone please suggest me a good book on NA tuning? Thanks
#25
It sounds like upRev may be working on a tuning solution that lets you tune cam timing.
I guess that would be an ideal situation for people with the revup motor...
Anyway dovla I don't know for certain about openloop/closed loop but it seems pretty solid reasoning from everything I've seen. I believe it's due to emissions since most people will be cruising at under 4k.
I suppose I could try some not-quite-WOT runs and see if it does closed loop all the way to redline. That would be a good experiment...
I guess that would be an ideal situation for people with the revup motor...
Anyway dovla I don't know for certain about openloop/closed loop but it seems pretty solid reasoning from everything I've seen. I believe it's due to emissions since most people will be cruising at under 4k.
I suppose I could try some not-quite-WOT runs and see if it does closed loop all the way to redline. That would be a good experiment...
#26
MOTORDYNE-MY350Z SPONSOR
iTrader: (53)
Originally Posted by Silo
And then I remember the issue with non-revup engines using the MREV2 + 5/16 spacer when the power fell below stock - incidentally also at >6k rpm. Anyone care to comment?
#28
Registered User
Originally Posted by Hydrazine
Its essentially showing the change in relative valve overlap Vs RPM.
Maximizing fuel economy at cruising RPM and maximizing power everywhere else.
Maximizing fuel economy at cruising RPM and maximizing power everywhere else.
#29
Registered User
Originally Posted by Wired 24/7
So closer to zero is max overlap? Because overlap = more power right?
#31
Originally Posted by miamimax96
Nope. Exactly the opposite. The closer it gets to zero the less overlap there is. The ECU retards the intake cam at high rpm to keep the intake valve open later in the stroke. This boosts high end power by taking advantage of the inertia of the intake charge.
Last edited by dovla; 09-24-2006 at 06:00 PM. Reason: I misread miamimax96 post as ECU retards timing instead of "ECU retards the [B]intake cam[/B]"
#32
miamimax96, does INTK_CAM_TIM-B1 [or B2] (Deg CA) represents value of (c) in above pic?
Why multiplied by two?
In above SM chart, OEM (c) value is –6 and mine goes up to –2 degrees, would power increase if somehow I could change it to –6 degrees above 6K rpm? And similarly, if maximum advanced cam angle is 45 degrees (big if) should it be changed to 45 degrees below 3K rpm?
Thanks
Somewhere on the net I read following:
There are two easy ways to change the characteristics of your cam. Advancing and retarding the cam can move the power band up or down a few hundred rpm. Advance for more bottom end and retard for more top end. It usually takes about a 4-degree change for a driver to feel it. The second way is to change the valve lash.
Originally Posted by miamimax96
...Essentially cam advance angle multiplied by two.
In above SM chart, OEM (c) value is –6 and mine goes up to –2 degrees, would power increase if somehow I could change it to –6 degrees above 6K rpm? And similarly, if maximum advanced cam angle is 45 degrees (big if) should it be changed to 45 degrees below 3K rpm?
Thanks
Somewhere on the net I read following:
There are two easy ways to change the characteristics of your cam. Advancing and retarding the cam can move the power band up or down a few hundred rpm. Advance for more bottom end and retard for more top end. It usually takes about a 4-degree change for a driver to feel it. The second way is to change the valve lash.
#33
Registered User
Originally Posted by dovla
miamimax96, does INTK_CAM_TIM-B1 [or B2] (Deg CA) represents value of (c) in above pic?
Why multiplied by two?
In above SM chart, OEM (c) value is –6 and mine goes up to –2 degrees, would power increase if somehow I could change it to –6 degrees above 6K rpm?
The -6 in the chart and your -2 are two seperate values.
And similarly, if maximum advanced cam angle is 45 degrees (big if) should it be changed to 45 degrees below 3K rpm?
Thanks
#35
miamimax96, thank you very much for answers. Finally some good info about cams, it seems to me that you know about cams. This is all Greek to me (no offense to Greeks). Please answer what you can, or how much your patience allows .
I always thought that Cipher parameters INTK_CAM_TIM-B1 (Deg CA) and INTK_CAM_TIM-B2 (Deg CA) represent cams angles at which they open intake valves. I had no clue that these Cipher degrees are actually half the TDC degrees values.
Yes, cam angle as reported by Cipher. I am lost again. First I though that in my Cipher logs above 6K rpm C is –2 degrees. Then, after reading your reply, I though that C is actually not –2 but -4 degrees in my chart. Both represent cams angle at which intake valves are open?
If the cams spin at exactly half the speed of the crank, why would VQ35DE cams angles separate like on this chart?
Are VQ35DE cams driven by VTC solenoids (oil pressure to the cams sprockets) and 0 degrees being solenoids are off?
Thanks again.
I always thought that Cipher parameters INTK_CAM_TIM-B1 (Deg CA) and INTK_CAM_TIM-B2 (Deg CA) represent cams angles at which they open intake valves. I had no clue that these Cipher degrees are actually half the TDC degrees values.
When you say "goes up to -2" are you referring to the cam angle?
The -6 in the chart and your -2 are two seperate values.
The -6 in the chart and your -2 are two seperate values.
If the cams spin at exactly half the speed of the crank, why would VQ35DE cams angles separate like on this chart?
Are VQ35DE cams driven by VTC solenoids (oil pressure to the cams sprockets) and 0 degrees being solenoids are off?
Thanks again.
#36
I have just removed the front plate from VCT sprocket & can confirm miamimax's statement that the cypher cam log is expressed in deg of crankshaft position not camshft.
There is only about 20 deg max rotation inside the sprocket.
There is only about 20 deg max rotation inside the sprocket.
#37
Originally Posted by Nathan
I have just removed the front plate from VCT sprocket & can confirm miamimax's statement that the cypher cam log is expressed in deg of crankshaft position not camshft.
There is only about 20 deg max rotation inside the sprocket.
There is only about 20 deg max rotation inside the sprocket.
#39
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Germany
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Hydrazine
Below stock?... Not possible unless something else is very wrong.
http://motordyneengineering.com/imag.../Andy-Dyno.jpg
It is listed under MREV. Than there are some better ones under MREV-PLUS but the currently offered version is MREV-2 - I must admit, I have lost track! Enlighten me...
#40
Originally Posted by Nathan
I have just removed the front plate from VCT sprocket & can confirm miamimax's statement that the cypher cam log is expressed in deg of crankshaft position not camshft.
There is only about 20 deg max rotation inside the sprocket.
There is only about 20 deg max rotation inside the sprocket.
I am visual kind; here are the pics also for others