Notices
Engine & Drivetrain VQ Power and Delivery

*E-manage Ultimate Tuned* Pics and Dynos Inside

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 20, 2006 | 07:08 AM
  #21  
Road Warrior's Avatar
Road Warrior
Registered User
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,669
Likes: 0
From: cali
Default

awesome numbers...congrats wired!

makes me really anxious now to get mine to the dyno with my mrev2 and crawford upper....with pop on standby. right now i am running a stock 06 airbox.

again, great job.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2006 | 07:11 AM
  #22  
Road Warrior's Avatar
Road Warrior
Registered User
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,669
Likes: 0
From: cali
Default

Originally Posted by Wired 24/7
By the way, Shawn told me about some kind of throttle body mod that gave him about 5hp... if it's cheap I might do it.

He said it makes the throttle body resemble a rifle barrel or something.


I also have tentative plans to go back and do a higher octane map. But I don't think we're going to squeeze much more power out of this motor (gut instinct talking) with the race fuel. Maybe 3-5 hp...
can you elaborate on that tb mod?
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2006 | 10:53 AM
  #23  
Wired 24/7's Avatar
Wired 24/7
Thread Starter
Dr. Wired
Premier Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 17,582
Likes: 9
From: San Mateo, CA
Default

Originally Posted by Road Warrior
can you elaborate on that tb mod?
Nope, I've told you all I know.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2006 | 10:54 AM
  #24  
Wired 24/7's Avatar
Wired 24/7
Thread Starter
Dr. Wired
Premier Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 17,582
Likes: 9
From: San Mateo, CA
Default

Originally Posted by Silo
I will probably ask this question in any thread that is about gains made by tuning with piggy-backs until we get the definite answer: won't the factory ECU equalize the gains by it's long-term fuel trim?
I'm going to keep checking everything using the cipher tool.

I think the ECU only learns at part-throttle. Not at WOT. I could be wrong though. Most of the tuning was done at WOT so I should be okay.

But I'll let you guys know if anything weird happens.

So far the car feels really solid. It feels REALLY Good passing people on city streets at low RPM in 3rd gear. The extra torque is kickass.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2006 | 10:57 AM
  #25  
Kenk2's Avatar
Kenk2
Professional
Premier Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,211
Likes: 0
From: Home
Default

Awesome numbers bro!! Get the HKS and gain about 10 more ponies..
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2006 | 11:01 AM
  #26  
97supratt's Avatar
97supratt
Registered User
iTrader: (61)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 5,034
Likes: 3
From: Glendale California
Default

Congrats Mike,

I'm glad the EU worked out for you.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2006 | 11:04 AM
  #27  
GSXR-Z's Avatar
GSXR-Z
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Default

Originally Posted by Wired 24/7
Nope, I've told you all I know.
If i had to guess, I would have to say that what he means by "similar to a rifle" is a process called rifling. This would invilve cutting helix shaped grooved into the throttle body thus spinning the are similar to a (shall i say it....ooh, wait...yeah, here it goes) TURBONATOR!

Edit** Link here : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rifling
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2006 | 11:05 AM
  #28  
Wired 24/7's Avatar
Wired 24/7
Thread Starter
Dr. Wired
Premier Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 17,582
Likes: 9
From: San Mateo, CA
Default

Originally Posted by GSXR-Z
If i had to guess, I would have to say that what he means by "similar to a rifle" is a process called rifling. This would invilve cutting helix shaped grooved into the throttle body thus spinning the are similar to a (shall i say it....ooh, wait...yeah, here it goes) TURBONATOR!
That's exactly what I said to Shawn. I was like "That sounds like a turbonator!!! "

But the difference is, a turbonator adds a restriction, whereas rifling does not
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2006 | 11:06 AM
  #29  
Wired 24/7's Avatar
Wired 24/7
Thread Starter
Dr. Wired
Premier Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 17,582
Likes: 9
From: San Mateo, CA
Default

Originally Posted by 97supratt
Congrats Mike,

I'm glad the EU worked out for you.
Oh believe me, it took a lot of leg work and soldering and research and frustration to get it to "work out for me" but now I know a lot about the EU and I can help other people out much better
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2006 | 11:08 AM
  #30  
GSXR-Z's Avatar
GSXR-Z
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Default

Originally Posted by Wired 24/7
That's exactly what I said to Shawn. I was like "That sounds like a turbonator!!! "

But the difference is, a turbonator adds a restriction, whereas rifling does not
I agree, but my guess is that a throttle body spacer would give you better gains doe to the higher volume of air in the plenum.

Maybe you can get a spacer and rifle both of em
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2006 | 11:38 AM
  #31  
dovla's Avatar
dovla
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
From: NJ
Default

Originally Posted by Silo
I will probably ask this question in any thread that is about gains made by tuning with piggy-backs until we get the definite answer: won't the factory ECU equalize the gains by it's long-term fuel trim?
Say Silo, in your opinion how long does it take ECU to settle it's long-term fuel trim? Thanks


Originally Posted by Wired 24/7
Also a significant portion of the gains came from using cipher for the +2 degrees of timing. For some reason the cipher advancing timing did a "better job" than the EU at advancing timing.
Nice gains Wired! And still good $/hp ratio regardless of all parts combined cost. Cant wait to do tune on my car, which btw with only change of +2 degrees gave me net gain of 3 Dyno Dynamics ponies (charts are in this post on g35driver site) which is probably within dyno error margin.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2006 | 11:41 AM
  #32  
cvt's Avatar
cvt
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,128
Likes: 0
From: los angeles area
Default

Originally Posted by Wired 24/7
I'd love cams, if only it wasn't like 12 hrs of labor.

I don't want headers, too loud...this is my daily driver.
...
i think headers only deepen the sound and only make it a little louder (maybe DC headers to add more mid range and tq + CARB)...as far as cams i know a few shops that would do it for a lot less than you think (good shops who have worked on cams on Zs before)...plus used cams go for 650-800...you can get them for around $1500 installed...i think it's a better deal than getting a $1100 exhaust that gives out only 8whp.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2006 | 03:41 PM
  #33  
Wired 24/7's Avatar
Wired 24/7
Thread Starter
Dr. Wired
Premier Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 17,582
Likes: 9
From: San Mateo, CA
Default

Originally Posted by cvt
i think headers only deepen the sound and only make it a little louder (maybe DC headers to add more mid range and tq + CARB)...as far as cams i know a few shops that would do it for a lot less than you think (good shops who have worked on cams on Zs before)...plus used cams go for 650-800...you can get them for around $1500 installed...i think it's a better deal than getting a $1100 exhaust that gives out only 8whp.
I wonder who I should trust to do cams in socal... Probably VRT or GT Motorsports.

I will ask these guys about install prices on cams. Although with cams I'd probably best do an exhaust at the same time. Wouldn't want the extra breathing power to be restricted too much.

The nice thing about my car right now, is I can easily go back to stock configuration in a day. Take off the popcharger, 5/16" spacer, trade someone the MREV2 for their lower collector, replace cats, remove emanage (since it is plug and play thanks to the autosport harness).

And no one would be the wiser, unless they look at the gaskets or something.

Last edited by Wired 24/7; Oct 20, 2006 at 03:46 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2006 | 02:30 AM
  #34  
Silo's Avatar
Silo
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
From: Germany
Default

Regarding the fuel-trim questions:

I have no idea how long it takes the ECU to "trim" the long term A/F correction.

But it is for sure true that it DOES affect WOT A/F too - that's the hitch with these new ECUs! Especialy with the wideband O2 sensor equipped cars. E.g. we measured 8 hp gains on '04 models with high flow cats but on a '06 modell there were no gains. Coincidence? I don't think so.
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2006 | 08:37 PM
  #35  
Wired 24/7's Avatar
Wired 24/7
Thread Starter
Dr. Wired
Premier Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 17,582
Likes: 9
From: San Mateo, CA
Default

Originally Posted by Silo
Regarding the fuel-trim questions:

I have no idea how long it takes the ECU to "trim" the long term A/F correction.

But it is for sure true that it DOES affect WOT A/F too - that's the hitch with these new ECUs! Especialy with the wideband O2 sensor equipped cars. E.g. we measured 8 hp gains on '04 models with high flow cats but on a '06 modell there were no gains. Coincidence? I don't think so.

Thanks for the info.

I will definitely keep a lookout using cipher in the near future to see how the ECU responds to the extra fuel from the EU.

No CEL's or anything so far, the car feels so much more responsive now, I love it
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2006 | 06:59 AM
  #36  
ZLadie2000's Avatar
ZLadie2000
Banned
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,393
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, FL
Default

is your car louder at all? any downsides whatsoever to the EU tune?
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2006 | 05:09 PM
  #37  
Wired 24/7's Avatar
Wired 24/7
Thread Starter
Dr. Wired
Premier Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 17,582
Likes: 9
From: San Mateo, CA
Default

Originally Posted by ZLadie2000
is your car louder at all? any downsides whatsoever to the EU tune?
It didn't change the sound... and the only downside is lower gas mileage. Which I noticed on the 200-mile cruise I took today...only slightly lower though.

Last edited by Wired 24/7; Oct 22, 2006 at 05:24 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2007 | 12:08 PM
  #38  
zluver's Avatar
zluver
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
From: Norman, OK
Default

Originally Posted by Wired 24/7
Also a significant portion of the gains came from using cipher for the +2 degrees of timing. For some reason the cipher advancing timing did a "better job" than the EU at advancing timing.
You know what i have noticed from going over 50 or so logs of my Z on the stock setting on the UTEC is that the averaging done by the stock ECU on the timing is very smooth, even when it pulls timing it does so gradually in small amounts and then adds it back within 200 crank cycles or so. The UTEC does not have this same ability to average timing from 02 sensor readouts and there is no smoothness when it pulls timing for knock, it just yanks 10-16 degrees and then dumps it all back in immediately. I have played with the settings on how much it should pull out and the max it should take out but it didnt work.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2007 | 10:59 PM
  #39  
Mark Basford's Avatar
Mark Basford
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
From: Folkestone, England
Default

Originally Posted by GSXR-Z
I agree, but my guess is that a throttle body spacer would give you better gains doe to the higher volume of air in the plenum.

Maybe you can get a spacer and rifle both of em
You can these spacers on Ebay. Got one in my garage to fit!

Will do it when my Utec arrives in a couple of weeks!
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2007 | 12:14 PM
  #40  
Wired 24/7's Avatar
Wired 24/7
Thread Starter
Dr. Wired
Premier Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 17,582
Likes: 9
From: San Mateo, CA
Default

Originally Posted by zluver
You know what i have noticed from going over 50 or so logs of my Z on the stock setting on the UTEC is that the averaging done by the stock ECU on the timing is very smooth, even when it pulls timing it does so gradually in small amounts and then adds it back within 200 crank cycles or so. The UTEC does not have this same ability to average timing from 02 sensor readouts and there is no smoothness when it pulls timing for knock, it just yanks 10-16 degrees and then dumps it all back in immediately. I have played with the settings on how much it should pull out and the max it should take out but it didnt work.
Good info, thanks
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:05 PM.