Notices
Engine & Drivetrain VQ Power and Delivery

rb26dett swap still debating?!?!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 21, 2008 | 06:20 PM
  #21  
carrera4s's Avatar
carrera4s
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
From: florida
Default

Exactly the point I was making that a vq on 8pounds will make more then a rb on 20pounds and the vqs displacement is larger then that of the rb so with a built engine I can see the vq costing less and also making more power on less boost
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2008 | 06:25 PM
  #22  
NismoFreak350's Avatar
NismoFreak350
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
From: Miami
Default

Originally Posted by carrera4s
Exactly the point I was making that a vq on 8pounds will make more then a rb on 20pounds and the vqs displacement is larger then that of the rb so with a built engine I can see the vq costing less and also making more power on less boost
yeah i see what your trying to tell me i looked up the pricing on the motor and tranny for the rb in the nearest store that has it and thier asking about 4800 bout maybe the same as a twin t's for the vq or correct me if im wrong of course thats not including installation motormounts etc. because im pretty sure it wont just bolt on haha
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2008 | 06:33 PM
  #23  
chuquison's Avatar
chuquison
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,944
Likes: 0
From: san diego, ca- daytona beach,
Default

https://my350z.com/forum/showthread....t=chuquison+rb

check this out
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2008 | 06:57 PM
  #24  
NismoFreak350's Avatar
NismoFreak350
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
From: Miami
Default

Originally Posted by chuquison
thanks alot this really got me thinking
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2008 | 06:58 PM
  #25  
T_K's Avatar
T_K
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 870
Likes: 3
From: Chicago
Default

Originally Posted by NismoFreak350
isnt stok boost on an rb 17 so 20 sumtin isnt much more
Stock boost on the R34 GTR was around 12.5-13.5psi IIRC. The cost of an RB swap, would be in the ballpark of building and boosting a VQ. The complexity of an RB swap alone is a pretty big deterrent if the cost isn't already. Also have to remember the displacement advantage of the VQ is going to be much more prominent in a boosted setup.

TK
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2008 | 07:53 PM
  #26  
ChrisR's Avatar
ChrisR
Registered User
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
From: Kissimmee & Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Default

theres a silver 350z by me with a 2jz swap
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2008 | 12:12 AM
  #27  
bbs350z's Avatar
bbs350z
Registered User
iTrader: (85)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,662
Likes: 2
From: Scottsdale AZ
Default

i like the ideas of swaps,, and there great, but imo, there tossing away a perfectly good powerplant. but its good to see change.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2008 | 03:31 AM
  #28  
ZSpectrum's Avatar
ZSpectrum
New Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,718
Likes: 0
From: Dallas
Default

what you all are missing is theres 1300awhp r34s running around and umm 700whp 350zs running around. And if youve ever driven an r34 you would never go back to your.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2008 | 10:44 AM
  #29  
WhiteOnWhite350z's Avatar
WhiteOnWhite350z
Registered User
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,427
Likes: 0
From: ThE 305
Default

Originally Posted by ChrisR
theres a silver 350z by me with a 2jz swap

You from Miami?
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2008 | 01:25 PM
  #30  
NismoFreak350's Avatar
NismoFreak350
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
From: Miami
Default

Originally Posted by ZSpectrum
what you all are missing is theres 1300awhp r34s running around and umm 700whp 350zs running around. And if youve ever driven an r34 you would never go back to your.
yea i definetly noticed that
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2008 | 03:16 PM
  #31  
carrera4s's Avatar
carrera4s
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
From: florida
Default

Originally Posted by ZSpectrum
what you all are missing is theres 1300awhp r34s running around and umm 700whp 350zs running around. And if youve ever driven an r34 you would never go back to your.
But you also have to consider that the rb has been around longer then the vq35. Also 1300whp is almost maxing out the rbs potential...while 700whp on a VQ can be acheived with small 18g turbos, built block and 20psi. Why do you think the new GTR is equipped with a VQ rather then another inline. The VQ35 has only been around a few years. Plus the VQ35 has .9L of displacement over the RB which makes for less spool time. But all the power to you for doing a RB swap
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2008 | 04:31 PM
  #32  
shadykilla717's Avatar
shadykilla717
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,222
Likes: 0
From: Long Island, New York
Default

Originally Posted by carrera4s
But you also have to consider that the rb has been around longer then the vq35. Also 1300whp is almost maxing out the rbs potential...while 700whp on a VQ can be acheived with small 18g turbos, built block and 20psi. Why do you think the new GTR is equipped with a VQ rather then another inline. The VQ35 has only been around a few years. Plus the VQ35 has .9L of displacement over the RB which makes for less spool time. But all the power to you for doing a RB swap
That does make sense. The gtr wouldn't have a VQ in it if the RB was a better powerplant....
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2008 | 05:11 PM
  #33  
NismoFreak350's Avatar
NismoFreak350
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
From: Miami
Default

Originally Posted by shadykilla717
That does make sense. The gtr wouldn't have a VQ in it if the RB was a better powerplant....
yeah that does make sense the vq is a realtively new compare to the rb
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2008 | 05:25 PM
  #34  
shadykilla717's Avatar
shadykilla717
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,222
Likes: 0
From: Long Island, New York
Default

Originally Posted by NismoFreak350
yeah that does make sense the vq is a realtively new compare to the rb

Yea I mean don't get me wrong that motor is amazing. I love it. But I just feel it woulda been used again. Or an upgraded version of it would be in the GTR if Nissan truly felt it was greater then the VQ. Also. I think some version of an RB woulda been in the Z's if it was that much better.... But hey. I don't blame you for wanting it. The proven performance has been around longer then our cars have....
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2008 | 07:02 PM
  #35  
carrera4s's Avatar
carrera4s
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
From: florida
Default

Originally Posted by shadykilla717
Yea I mean don't get me wrong that motor is amazing. I love it. But I just feel it woulda been used again. Or an upgraded version of it would be in the GTR if Nissan truly felt it was greater then the VQ. Also. I think some version of an RB woulda been in the Z's if it was that much better.... But hey. I don't blame you for wanting it. The proven performance has been around longer then our cars have....
And thats the whole arguement the fact that the rb has shown high numbers and the vq has yet to get there. It all depends on if your willing to wait for the vq to get to the rb level. But I have my beliefs that down the road with a better tranny and better gear ratios the vq35 will be the new highway monster. with a 4.2L stroker kit and a 88mm turbo on a vq35 I doubt anything will be able to touch it except for twin turbo vipers or hayabusas. The only problem is it will take some time for it to be perfected.
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2008 | 12:30 AM
  #36  
bbs350z's Avatar
bbs350z
Registered User
iTrader: (85)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,662
Likes: 2
From: Scottsdale AZ
Default

the rb didnt pass u.s. emissions, and never will, hence they scrapped it for the vq in the new gtr. imo, give the vq some more time to be played with. after all, it makes great numbers fi, and i feel we're just scratching the surface.

Originally Posted by ZSpectrum
what you all are missing is theres 1300awhp r34s running around and umm 700whp 350zs running around. And if youve ever driven an r34 you would never go back to your.
you also have to remember the gearing is different. you cant use the gtr's awd tranny, youd have to use the rb25 tranny from the rwd gts-t skyline. also the characteristics of a rwd car are much different than an awd car. i have driven plenty of awd cars...and let me tell you, there a completely different animal.
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2008 | 12:31 AM
  #37  
bbs350z's Avatar
bbs350z
Registered User
iTrader: (85)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,662
Likes: 2
From: Scottsdale AZ
Default

1000+rwhp supras werent born overnight. its called r&d, and our car is going through alot of it.
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2008 | 09:01 AM
  #38  
Jeff92se's Avatar
Jeff92se
New Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 44,920
Likes: 1,080
From: nw
Default

Actually the RB was discontinued well before it was considered for US importation.

Maybe Miami is different but I think if you swap engines, it must be from the same year or newer than the engine it replaces? From a legal standpoint?
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2008 | 06:52 PM
  #39  
NismoFreak350's Avatar
NismoFreak350
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
From: Miami
Default

I think ima hold out then and see were the vqs go and i kno im gonna end up saving alot of money and alot less of a headache
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2008 | 03:01 PM
  #40  
NoahzBurnt's Avatar
NoahzBurnt
Registered User
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,704
Likes: 0
From: one of the 5 boros, NY
Default

Single Turbo LS2....i'll let u know how that works out soon!!!
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:28 AM.