Who thinks the engine bay is too tight
#1
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Saint John N.B
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Who thinks the engine bay is too tight
like i noted. who thinks its very small and hard to work in. and if so which is your lease favorite part to work on
#2
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
Well...if there was more room to accommodate easier accessibility, our front hood--hell the entire car would be much, much bigger. Sure it's tight. But I'm pretty sure that that's pretty much the point.
Oh, and my least favorite part to work on is getting to the damn bulbs. LOL!
Oh, and my least favorite part to work on is getting to the damn bulbs. LOL!
Trending Topics
#12
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
Nah, suspension is pretty easy, only issues I had were stuck bolts, other then that, around 1 hour each side in the front and 30 minutes for each rear.
Just a matter of approaching it the right way, it sucks trying to save time by not removing something extra, only to find out later you made life that much harder for yourself.
Just a matter of approaching it the right way, it sucks trying to save time by not removing something extra, only to find out later you made life that much harder for yourself.
#13
350Z-holic
iTrader: (26)
Originally Posted by Hydrazine
Have you seen under the hood of a S2000?
The S2K is a tiny car but it has so much room in the engine compartment you can practically jump inside of it to do your engine work.
It would be very nice to have that much room in a Z.
The S2K is a tiny car but it has so much room in the engine compartment you can practically jump inside of it to do your engine work.
It would be very nice to have that much room in a Z.
The biggest problem with all that extra room, it usually translates into more body/frame weight. I guess that's why the 370Z will be 6" shorter and a few hundred pounds lighter.
#14
Registered User
iTrader: (13)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: In the wrong lane
Posts: 6,433
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Phantom Menace
Oh, okay. You win! I've yet to do that to my Z but I'm sure that sucks Trucker ***!
#15
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
Originally Posted by Hydrazine
Have you seen under the hood of a S2000?
The S2K is a tiny car but it has so much room in the engine compartment you can practically jump inside of it to do your engine work.
It would be very nice to have that much room in a Z.
The S2K is a tiny car but it has so much room in the engine compartment you can practically jump inside of it to do your engine work.
It would be very nice to have that much room in a Z.
Most rwd V6's or Inline 6's have a pretty compact engine bay nowadays.
The only cars that have some real-estate under the hood are transverse- mounted 4-bangers and domestics equipped with a smaller V8. (e.g. GM cars equipped with the LS series motor.)
We have to compromise with an FM layout and short overhangs on the Z.
#17
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Pasadena, MD
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Phantom Menace
I had a TTZ32 and I agree. Actually, the only car I've owned that I can recall having a "spacious" engine bay was my old Chevelle. Even my CRXs' had tight quarters.
The Z32TT engine bay is a complete PITA to work in, for sure. A simple thing like O2 sensors...
#18
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Pasadena, MD
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 35oZephyR
Most rwd V6's or Inline 6's have a pretty compact engine bay nowadays.
The only cars that have some real-estate under the hood are transverse- mounted 4-bangers and domestics equipped with a smaller V8. (e.g. GM cars equipped with the LS series motor.)
The only cars that have some real-estate under the hood are transverse- mounted 4-bangers and domestics equipped with a smaller V8. (e.g. GM cars equipped with the LS series motor.)