Notices
Engine & Drivetrain VQ Power and Delivery

Dynoe'd Car :D

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 13, 2003 | 04:34 PM
  #1  
Juztin's Avatar
Juztin
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,027
Likes: 29
From: Los Lunas, NM
Default Dynoe'd Car :D

Info before dyno..

Location : Aurora, Colorado
Elevation : 5680ft
Temp : 90 F (97 F ambient @ shop not factored)
Pressure : 30.22"
Dew : 32 F
Relative : 79.7% of rated hp
Dyno Correction Factor : 1.254

Today was hot as f***, but here are the numbers,

Max Power = 240.1
Max Torque = 228.2

Corrected:

Max Power = 301.08
Max Torque = 286.16

Please take these num#'s with a grain of salt, but mods on the car are:

JWT Pop Charger
Crawford Z Plenum
Nismo Headers
LSD cat pipes
Borla Dual Exhaust

& 18,138 miles on the engine thus far. I'll try and scan the dyno sheet tomarrow @ work.

Next up:
UR Pulleys & Tomei Cams
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2003 | 05:00 PM
  #2  
little_rod's Avatar
little_rod
New Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,114
Likes: 0
From: In my car, Arkansas
Default

cooool, do you have a baseline?? Man, at that elevation, that is pretty good.
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2003 | 05:18 PM
  #3  
Juztin's Avatar
Juztin
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,027
Likes: 29
From: Los Lunas, NM
Default

Thanks little_rod , unfortunately this is my baseline as I never dynoed the car before. Next time I dyno the car I will get more like 3 runs in instead of one. Been putting a lotof work into the car and it's paying off . I'll be running the quarter mile sometime this month, but probably on 20" rims when I get my Axis rims in . Have a good night!

L8te
--Justin
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2003 | 07:18 PM
  #4  
JZC's Avatar
JZC
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 632
Likes: 0
From: Strongbadia
Default

Sweet, that's kinda the same line up I'm gonna be doing.

What is that to the crank?
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2003 | 07:31 PM
  #5  
Juztin's Avatar
Juztin
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,027
Likes: 29
From: Los Lunas, NM
Default

About 340 - 350hp w/ drive train loss factored back in
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2003 | 08:57 PM
  #6  
little_rod's Avatar
little_rod
New Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,114
Likes: 0
From: In my car, Arkansas
Default

Wow, that is a lot more at the crank than I thought for an N/A setup like that. Of course, all that money would have gone a long way towards FI...........
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2003 | 10:08 PM
  #7  
JZC's Avatar
JZC
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 632
Likes: 0
From: Strongbadia
Default

I'm doing all of the WITH a Procharger.

Bwuahahahahaha
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2003 | 10:27 PM
  #8  
MY350Z.COM's Avatar
MY350Z.COM
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 579
Likes: 2
Default

impressive numbers
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2003 | 11:40 PM
  #9  
350ZMotorsports's Avatar
350ZMotorsports
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix, AZ
Default

I know you said you didn't dyno it stock, but did you run it at the track before any mods? It would be an interesting before and after comparison.
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2003 | 12:38 AM
  #10  
syf0n's Avatar
syf0n
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,426
Likes: 0
From: new orleans
Default Re: Dynoe'd Car :D

Originally posted by Juztin

Today was hot as f***, but here are the numbers,

Max Power = 240.1
Max Torque = 228.2

Corrected:

Max Power = 301.08
Max Torque = 286.16
Okay...so maybe I'm a total idiot, but what is the difference between the corrected numbers and the raw numbers? I don't think corrected means crank, because you then guesstimated that as well.

So I'm confused why there is such a huge bump from the raw numbers to the "corrected" numbers. Does "corrected" mean "sea-level estimate"?

Help?
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2003 | 02:26 AM
  #11  
jehjr68's Avatar
jehjr68
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
From: Savannah, Georgia
Default Re: Re: Dynoe'd Car :D

Originally posted by syf0n
Okay...so maybe I'm a total idiot, but what is the difference between the corrected numbers and the raw numbers? I don't think corrected means crank, because you then guesstimated that as well.

So I'm confused why there is such a huge bump from the raw numbers to the "corrected" numbers. Does "corrected" mean "sea-level estimate"?

Help?
Corrected means thats the numbers are corrected for std. temperature and pressure. So yes, corrected means an estimate of the power at sea level and std. temp ! It's way for everyone to compare data no matter where you live and what the outside temp is !
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2003 | 06:07 AM
  #12  
Juztin's Avatar
Juztin
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,027
Likes: 29
From: Los Lunas, NM
Default

Nope, I didnt ever run it on the track before or after the upgrades (not yet ). I just found out that there is a test & tune night up at Bandimere speedway on wednesday and runs about 30 bucks for as many runs till close. Some of the Z guys in the south west forum are thinking about getting together to do a test & tune night. I'll be there if they get that going pretty soon, otherwise I'll wait for good ol pay day and take the car down to the track. And exactly as jeh mentioned. Corrected is the way to get an idea of what my car would be putting out at sea level and "ideal" pressure and humidity, temp, etc.. You can check out SAE correction parameters to get an idea of what their idea is of the best conditions for power output. The altitude up here is really killer . But this state has toooo many super kik a$$ twisty roads through the mountains to move some where else

According from the people I've talked to that test & tune, stock Z's are running around 15.5 ish runs down the 1/4 mile. Altitude sucks...

--Justin

Last edited by Juztin; Aug 14, 2003 at 06:09 AM.
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2003 | 06:12 AM
  #13  
Juztin's Avatar
Juztin
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,027
Likes: 29
From: Los Lunas, NM
Default

Wow, that is a lot more at the crank than I thought for an N/A setup like that. Of course, all that money would have gone a long way towards FI...........
Just like JZC, all the mods plus cams and pulleys will make a meannnnn setup with a Procharger and the stock psi
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2003 | 06:19 AM
  #14  
cbsuper's Avatar
cbsuper
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 469
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix, AZ
Default

I'll be posting mines tomorrow. I should be putting down the same numbers as well.
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2003 | 06:25 AM
  #15  
Juztin's Avatar
Juztin
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,027
Likes: 29
From: Los Lunas, NM
Default

SWEET
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2003 | 09:58 AM
  #16  
350ZMotorsports's Avatar
350ZMotorsports
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix, AZ
Default

If stock ones are running 15.5 (not sure how good those drivers are) I'm guessing you'll better those times by about 4-6 tenths and a few mph
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2003 | 11:56 AM
  #17  
Juztin's Avatar
Juztin
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,027
Likes: 29
From: Los Lunas, NM
Default

I'll be running down the 1/4mile with some local Zers here in Denver on 8/20/03 I'd be happy if I can run a very high 14 . That will be my first time running down the 1/4 so we'll see what kinda laughs happen
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2003 | 12:15 PM
  #18  
nonmature's Avatar
nonmature
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
From: OC
Default

Originally posted by Juztin
I'll be running down the 1/4mile with some local Zers here in Denver on 8/20/03 I'd be happy if I can run a very high 14 . That will be my first time running down the 1/4 so we'll see what kinda laughs happen
what the hell are you talkin about... I ran 14.55 bone stock and a 14.09 with only I/E/ECU and the tuning on the ecu didnt touch the fuel maps... honestly bro I dont think you'll have any trouble breakin into the mid 13's... hahaha just remeber TAKE YOU TCS OFF!!!!! hahaha I left my on and got a great laugh out of that... good luck....

-non
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2003 | 12:30 PM
  #19  
Blue Liquid's Avatar
Blue Liquid
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
From: Chesterfield, NJ
Default

I think many stock Z's dyno at his pre-corrected numbers, correct?
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2003 | 12:50 PM
  #20  
shaneotool's Avatar
shaneotool
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 573
Likes: 0
From: Arkansas
Default

Those look like good numbers for your altitude, but those corrected numbers seem pretty high.

300 whp with those mods is crazy. I realize that would be at sea level with perfect conditions, but still.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:39 PM.