I'll leave it up to some Z owners. Can we put Gs on the list?

 

I actually have no desire one way or another to be put on the list. I was just curious as to how my G compared to all the Z's out there. I had originally put a deposit down on a Z.....but fell in love with the G. (the fact that I have two little kids that would rather have a back seat vice a trunk area to sit in....well it made more sense for the G). From the data I've read....the G and Z are very close and sometimes the results are suprising when doing dynos. Also, which dyno will show "greater" numbers....a dynojet or a Mustang dyno? Mine was performed on a Mustang. Gya later...Rich

 

Well, a Mustang has shown higher numbers than dynojet, but some people think that mustangs usually show lower on avg. personally, i have no idea. I don't have any dyno experience. anyways, i think once you start modding the cars, the G and Z will show similar numbers as they are the same motor and the mods will replace the parts that restrict the G's power.

 

Here are my numbers from todays dynos. We first ran just the Crawford Package. Then tried the latest TS Flash (still needs work) and then we added the JWT pop charger. Here are the charts.

Here is baseline, plenum, plenum+headers+cats.



Click here for large image...

Here is the above Crawford Package with other mods (JWT pop charger and Technosquare ECU)




Click here for large image...


So pencil me in for the 259.9 run on the list!!!!

 

Can we add a column for gains vs baseline. This would make more sense given dyno to dyno variations. Especially for the N/A list.

 

im gettin dynoed in 3 weeks hopefully....

 

I'm going in for my first dyno on tuesday at AAM. I think they use a dynojet. Any theories on the results based on my installed mods? And what about the addition of Nismo headers and cams?

 

250 - 255ish.

Add Nismo headers and cams - Maybe another 15. Might want to wait on the NISMO headers, if you plan on doing the NISMO cams - we've already discovered NISMO didn't do any research about mating their header combo to their cams. VERY obvious that their headers are UGLY corkers once cams are dropped in.

 

i run a 13.73@103.00/ 60ft 2.135 / bone stock at, ALABAMA INT DRAGWAY.

 

Glad to see some intelligence!

WAY too many variables to compare. Add altitude, temp, humidity, calibration, gear tested in, 1st run or 3rd, lunar position, day of the week.......etc.

 

Sure, everone PM with their baselines that is on the chart.

 

At least for my car, we found the cat's to be the big restriction with cam installs. Gained 15 hp when the RT's were added letting the car breathe. All these cars sure act different though, making it pretty hard for us to to make hp promises. If it wasn't for the S/C project coming up on my car, I sure would have liked to try the Crawford Plenum next.

 

Here ya go!

 

After reading all the blown engines from FI, NA seems to be a heII of a lot safer to me. It's probably the route I'm goign to go.

I'm really curious to see some N/A 1/4 mile times. You guys in the top 10 should take it to the strip....and post!

 

Hey were is the Schuitemaker Motorsport/ Wright Tuning 350EVO 350Z.....
HP hmmmmmmmm
tq hmmmmmmmm
If i told ya i would have to kill ya!
but it is 2850 LBS

 

Street cars only!

 

It started as a street car!

 

Didn't they all.

 

wow. Some serious impressive times for bolt on Zs. Keep it up guys. Won't be able to make it to strip until January. Give you some numbers then

 

ecu + injen intake

254whp, 247lb torque