Notices
Exterior & Interior 350Z Body modification, interior styling and lighting
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Metallic vs Non-Metallic Window Film Tint

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-22-2008, 07:45 AM
  #1  
tristyle
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
tristyle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Metallic vs Non-Metallic Window Film Tint

Hello,

I went to a window tint place yesterday for my G35 and was offered two types of tint, one was metallic based film and the other was non-metallic. There was a big price difference (non-metallic $69, metalllic $140-$160).

Does anyone know the difference between the two and how effective it is. I don't have much experience with window tints.

The guy at the car shop told me he uses this brand/company:

www.solargard.com

Thanks.
Old 08-22-2008, 07:47 AM
  #2  
Z04
Registered User
iTrader: (15)
 
Z04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Clarksville, Tennessee
Posts: 6,612
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

easy, one has metal in it, the other doesn't. plus you already pointed out the main difference. regular tint will do you just fine. sounds like the guy there is just trying to make a sale IMO
Old 08-22-2008, 07:49 AM
  #3  
tristyle
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
tristyle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I was looking for a response from other people that have experience with both, or if you can actually tell a big difference in the two. I know both should work fine, but is the metallic one a signifcant improvement in blocking off solar heat/energy?
Old 08-22-2008, 07:50 AM
  #4  
phreaktor
¯¯\_(ツ)_/¯
iTrader: (22)
 
phreaktor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: The Marketplace
Posts: 28,233
Received 32 Likes on 24 Posts
Default

I've heard metallic tint can affect radio reception.
Old 08-22-2008, 09:09 AM
  #5  
Z CRUZN
Registered User
 
Z CRUZN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 675
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tristyle
I was looking for a response from other people that have experience with both, or if you can actually tell a big difference in the two. I know both should work fine, but is the metallic one a signifcant improvement in blocking off solar heat/energy?

I don't care for the appearance of the metallic tint - the several I've seen (friends) have a slight copper-ish mirror-like sheen to them (not like the solid mirror-type finish, but a slight mirror appearance at certain angles). It apparently gives a better sun-blocking ability. I like the plain-old non-metallic smoke tint.
Old 08-22-2008, 03:23 PM
  #6  
eddiebrock71
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
eddiebrock71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

depending on the brand of film, both are about equal in UV protection. Metallics have different grades of reflectivity. Just go with a good company, I personally like Formula One.
Old 08-22-2008, 03:25 PM
  #7  
Spork
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Spork's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: MN
Posts: 27,592
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

I don't like metallic, because it gives a somewhat reflective grayish color.

I opted for non-metallic because it gave the best black look.

I use SolarGard film for the tinting I do. Good stuff.
Old 08-22-2008, 11:47 PM
  #8  
Mkriebs
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Mkriebs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Illinois
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have Metallic tint on my car, and even though I have no experience doing this myself, or comparing the 2 tints, I like my metallic. It goes good with my Interlagos fire, because, like someone said, it gives off a bit of a copper color.

I could however, go with something a bit darker...
Old 08-23-2008, 03:49 AM
  #9  
Z04
Registered User
iTrader: (15)
 
Z04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Clarksville, Tennessee
Posts: 6,612
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by tristyle
I was looking for a response from other people that have experience with both, or if you can actually tell a big difference in the two. I know both should work fine, but is the metallic one a signifcant improvement in blocking off solar heat/energy?

and like i said, sounds like the guy is just trying to make a sale
Old 08-23-2008, 05:32 AM
  #10  
Bushie
Registered User
 
Bushie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Not much of a difference one looks like a mirror finish and the other is black. Depends on the look you want. I like Lumar tint they have what is called a platinum tint which i wanted for my car. I like the look with the silver alloy paint better than dark black IMO.
Old 08-27-2008, 01:25 PM
  #11  
tristyle
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
tristyle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Ok I ended up getting the metallic tint. It was from Solar Gard (www.solargard.com). I paid a little more but so far it does its job pretty well. Thanks for the inputs.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Siqcology
Maintenance & Repair
5
09-18-2019 01:45 PM
Boots patrol
Exterior
6
11-07-2015 12:26 PM
AP350z223
Maintenance & Repair
6
09-08-2015 04:38 PM



Quick Reply: Metallic vs Non-Metallic Window Film Tint



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:20 AM.