Can we create a "half asian" only section with password lock?
07-14-2007, 10:24 AM
#41
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Springfield VA
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Janus
1.) Because I paid money to support this site and get special access.
2.) Because it discriminates against the people who are not of the "favored" minority.
3.) Because it violates the ToU of this site. (Which of course you can change at will.)
2.) Because it discriminates against the people who are not of the "favored" minority.
3.) Because it violates the ToU of this site. (Which of course you can change at will.)
Sure I can meet your demands. paypal me $20 and it shall be done
07-14-2007, 11:18 AM
#42
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: High Desert
Posts: 410
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I kinda feel the same way. Explain why there is a need for a damn GIRLS only thread? In my opinion its a waste of bandwidth and space. Give it a few months and it will be gone, there wont be enough traffic in there.
07-14-2007, 12:43 PM
#44
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Orange/So Cal
Posts: 4,738
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ah yes, the maturity is coming out in force now. Because I disagree with something that must mean that I am:
a.) Butt Hurt
b.) Have sand in my vagina
c.) Whine too much.
More childish an puerile remarks from people who can't articulate anything more than insults.
Disagreeing with me is fine. But explain to me why you disagree instead of attempting to insult me. Otherwise you only illustrate your childish immaturity with your ad hominen remarks.
a.) Butt Hurt
b.) Have sand in my vagina
c.) Whine too much.
More childish an puerile remarks from people who can't articulate anything more than insults.
Disagreeing with me is fine. But explain to me why you disagree instead of attempting to insult me. Otherwise you only illustrate your childish immaturity with your ad hominen remarks.
07-14-2007, 05:45 PM
#46
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 4,044
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Janus
Ah yes, the maturity is coming out in force now. Because I disagree with something that must mean that I am:
a.) Butt Hurt
b.) Have sand in my vagina
c.) Whine too much.
More childish an puerile remarks from people who can't articulate anything more than insults.
Disagreeing with me is fine. But explain to me why you disagree instead of attempting to insult me. Otherwise you only illustrate your childish immaturity with your ad hominen remarks.
a.) Butt Hurt
b.) Have sand in my vagina
c.) Whine too much.
More childish an puerile remarks from people who can't articulate anything more than insults.
Disagreeing with me is fine. But explain to me why you disagree instead of attempting to insult me. Otherwise you only illustrate your childish immaturity with your ad hominen remarks.
because this is such a mature and meaningful thread in the first place. Talk about hypocrisy. geez
07-14-2007, 06:20 PM
#49
Abzolutely Zexy
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Lithia/Tampa, Flo-Rida Bishes
Posts: 5,504
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
2 Posts
Originally Posted by drivenCSZ
because this is such a mature and meaningful thread in the first place. Talk about hypocrisy. geezI'm glad to see you post this. Thanks!
07-15-2007, 12:06 AM
#50
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by blasian
They need to create a Males with Vagina subforum with a password.
im old gregg
http://youtube.com/watch?v=Z-eEGXaT6Ac
Last edited by **; 07-15-2007 at 01:35 AM.
07-15-2007, 12:51 AM
#51
New Member
iTrader: (37)
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 6,482
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by redsoxfan184524
what about us N.A.M.B.L.A.'s???
N orth
A merican
M an
B oy
L ove
A ssociation
07-15-2007, 01:01 AM
#52
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Orange/So Cal
Posts: 4,738
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by drivenCSZ
because this is such a mature and meaningful thread in the first place. Talk about hypocrisy. geezOr.
I was using sarcasm to point out the absurdity of the dilemma.
Hmmmm... I wonder which it could be?
(Since you didn't get it the first time, I thought I'd give you a hand and point out that previous line and first line are sarcasm.)
Besides, which parties in this issue are making immature comments such as: "Buy him a VagIna already!!", "you sure as hell whine and complains as much as a woman", "They need to create a Males with Vagina subforum with a password"?
I really don't care what the sub forum is. It could of been "midgets with amputated stumps" for all I care. I am not objecting to the fact that it is a WOMEN'S sub forum, I am objecting to the creation of a Subforum (regardless of content) that is password protected and excludes premiere (paying) members.
But apparently the people here can't get their heads to stop thinking "OMG HE HATES WOMENZ!!!" to realize what I am actually saying.
Again, all I see is snide remarks and insults. The only person who actually thought about what he said and articulated a disagreement in opposition to me was GodZilla.
Its really quite simple; I am right, in principal. But it really is GodZilla's site so ultimately he can do whatever he wants. I thought making a post disagreeing with this would lead to a discussion. Instead all I see is garbage spewed by people who can only insult others when they disagree instead of explaining why they disagree.
Nice job people! You sure put me in my place! I guess since I have "sand in my vagina", "have a vagina on order" and/or "am a woman since I whine so much" I should just go back in the kitchen and make Fowlman a sandwhich?
07-15-2007, 10:01 AM
#54
Originally Posted by Janus
My goal is really to create a multitude of ridiculous sub-forums, each password protected so people can be excluded from their access.
Or.
I was using sarcasm to point out the absurdity of the dilemma.
Hmmmm... I wonder which it could be?
(Since you didn't get it the first time, I thought I'd give you a hand and point out that previous line and first line are sarcasm.)
Besides, which parties in this issue are making immature comments such as: "Buy him a VagIna already!!", "you sure as hell whine and complains as much as a woman", "They need to create a Males with Vagina subforum with a password"?
I really don't care what the sub forum is. It could of been "midgets with amputated stumps" for all I care. I am not objecting to the fact that it is a WOMEN'S sub forum, I am objecting to the creation of a Subforum (regardless of content) that is password protected and excludes premiere (paying) members.
But apparently the people here can't get their heads to stop thinking "OMG HE HATES WOMENZ!!!" to realize what I am actually saying.
Again, all I see is snide remarks and insults. The only person who actually thought about what he said and articulated a disagreement in opposition to me was GodZilla.
Its really quite simple; I am right, in principal. But it really is GodZilla's site so ultimately he can do whatever he wants. I thought making a post disagreeing with this would lead to a discussion. Instead all I see is garbage spewed by people who can only insult others when they disagree instead of explaining why they disagree.
Nice job people! You sure put me in my place! I guess since I have "sand in my vagina", "have a vagina on order" and/or "am a woman since I whine so much" I should just go back in the kitchen and make Fowlman a sandwhich?
Or.
I was using sarcasm to point out the absurdity of the dilemma.
Hmmmm... I wonder which it could be?
(Since you didn't get it the first time, I thought I'd give you a hand and point out that previous line and first line are sarcasm.)
Besides, which parties in this issue are making immature comments such as: "Buy him a VagIna already!!", "you sure as hell whine and complains as much as a woman", "They need to create a Males with Vagina subforum with a password"?
I really don't care what the sub forum is. It could of been "midgets with amputated stumps" for all I care. I am not objecting to the fact that it is a WOMEN'S sub forum, I am objecting to the creation of a Subforum (regardless of content) that is password protected and excludes premiere (paying) members.
But apparently the people here can't get their heads to stop thinking "OMG HE HATES WOMENZ!!!" to realize what I am actually saying.
Again, all I see is snide remarks and insults. The only person who actually thought about what he said and articulated a disagreement in opposition to me was GodZilla.
Its really quite simple; I am right, in principal. But it really is GodZilla's site so ultimately he can do whatever he wants. I thought making a post disagreeing with this would lead to a discussion. Instead all I see is garbage spewed by people who can only insult others when they disagree instead of explaining why they disagree.
Nice job people! You sure put me in my place! I guess since I have "sand in my vagina", "have a vagina on order" and/or "am a woman since I whine so much" I should just go back in the kitchen and make Fowlman a sandwhich?
So lets say they made a homo forum you would be b**ching to get that password also.
Why do you want to go into a womens forum so bad I just don't understand
07-15-2007, 11:50 AM
#56
CHRIS (350) FTL
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: the gay area, ca (I miss LA)
Posts: 4,482
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by soleil350z
what about 100% asians that smoke?
07-15-2007, 12:29 PM
#58
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Hood Canal, WA.
Posts: 3,595
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Full Asians should have twice the privileges as half Asians. Unless of course being half-Asian is a bad thing. In that case full Asians are twice as bad and should get less privileges than even the non-Asians.
The discrimination started by the Ladies Only section is an unnecessary shot at the Administrator's own foot. The only reason I can see for justification is the Administration's failure to keep sexual discrimination off the main threads. It is a lose-lose situation for the Administration. Reminds me of the carefully thought out "get rich quick ads" that were headlined last fall.
The discrimination started by the Ladies Only section is an unnecessary shot at the Administrator's own foot. The only reason I can see for justification is the Administration's failure to keep sexual discrimination off the main threads. It is a lose-lose situation for the Administration. Reminds me of the carefully thought out "get rich quick ads" that were headlined last fall.
07-15-2007, 02:29 PM
#59
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Orange/So Cal
Posts: 4,738
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by RED HOT Z
So your saying it doesnt matter what sub forum they make but it shouldn't be password protected?
So lets say they made a homo forum you would be b**ching to get that password also. Why do you want to go into a womens forum so bad I just don't understand
So lets say they made a homo forum you would be b**ching to get that password also.
Why do you want to go into a womens forum so bad I just don't understand
07-15-2007, 02:30 PM
#60
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Northwest
Posts: 6,573
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by I1DER
Full Asians should have twice the privileges as half Asians. Unless of course being half-Asian is a bad thing. In that case full Asians are twice as bad and should get less privileges than even the non-Asians.
The discrimination started by the Ladies Only section is an unnecessary shot at the Administrator's own foot. The only reason I can see for justification is the Administration's failure to keep sexual discrimination off the main threads. It is a lose-lose situation for the Administration. Reminds me of the carefully thought out "get rich quick ads" that were headlined last fall.
The discrimination started by the Ladies Only section is an unnecessary shot at the Administrator's own foot. The only reason I can see for justification is the Administration's failure to keep sexual discrimination off the main threads. It is a lose-lose situation for the Administration. Reminds me of the carefully thought out "get rich quick ads" that were headlined last fall.
+1. I heard about those.