Notices
Forced Induction Turbochargers and Superchargers..Got Boost?

Will forged internals prevent this? Is this the NEXT weak link?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 26, 2004 | 03:42 PM
  #1  
JCat's Avatar
JCat
Thread Starter
---------------
Premier Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,996
Likes: 76
From: JC in Atlanta Georgia
Default Will forged internals prevent this? Is this the NEXT weak link?

.
http://www.350zfrenzy.com/forum/show...&threadid=5302
.
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2004 | 07:53 PM
  #2  
Sharif@Forged's Avatar
Sharif@Forged
Sponsor
Forged Performance
iTrader: (92)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 13,733
Likes: 1
From: Marietta, GA
Default

Spun bearings are the restult of oil starvation, excessive high RPM operatation, or sustained detonation. This can happen to any motor...not just F/I. I am not certain of forged rods and upgraded rods bolts will help, but proper tuning will. Also, some folks will blueprint and balance the motor, and coat the bearings...which may help.
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2004 | 04:15 AM
  #3  
paul_kemshall's Avatar
paul_kemshall
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
From: UK
Default

Looks to me like the PV for the bearings has been grossly exceeded - typical if going FI.

Bearing life was an issue on the Supra when tuned after that it was the Gearbox input shaft getting ripped off followed by Diff cases exploding.

If you significantly increase the power of your engine this is to be expected...

Cheers


Paul
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2004 | 05:56 AM
  #4  
JCat's Avatar
JCat
Thread Starter
---------------
Premier Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,996
Likes: 76
From: JC in Atlanta Georgia
Default

What can we do to help prevent or avoid this type of failure?
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2004 | 06:51 AM
  #5  
2003z's Avatar
2003z
New Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 4,959
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta
Default

my guess is don't do top speed racing like she does. She has lots of time at 145+ mph.
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2004 | 07:37 AM
  #6  
Philthy's Avatar
Philthy
Boost Junkie
Premier Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,018
Likes: 1
From: Centeral NJ
Default

Wondering if that car had a crank pulley... ?
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2004 | 08:39 AM
  #7  
teh215's Avatar
teh215
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 5,753
Likes: 4
From: Charlottesville, Virginia
Default

Originally posted by Philthy
Wondering if that car had a crank pulley... ?
What would a pulley have to do with oil starvation?
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2004 | 09:32 AM
  #8  
g356gear's Avatar
g356gear
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,222
Likes: 0
From: Man in the Sun
Default

Originally posted by teh215
What would a pulley have to do with oil starvation?
It is not really an oil starvation problem. There are issues with changed crank harmonics when you change to the different pulley. This stresses the crank bearings which can lead to a failure (spun) bearing.
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2004 | 09:50 AM
  #9  
westpak's Avatar
westpak
SFZCC
Premier Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 7,420
Likes: 2
From: Lake Worth, FL
Default

Well she has the SC so no Crank pulley change, so this point is non existant.
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2004 | 11:15 AM
  #10  
Sins4u33's Avatar
Sins4u33
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,635
Likes: 0
From: Annandale, VA
Default

the guy also quoted he was running the car at 145...heating up the supercharger...not only that running the engine on a high load in such a high gear...puts alot of stress and work on the engine.....not the greatest idea to do on a FI car on a stock motor....

Ben
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2004 | 12:21 PM
  #11  
westpak's Avatar
westpak
SFZCC
Premier Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 7,420
Likes: 2
From: Lake Worth, FL
Default

Originally posted by Sins4u33
the guy also quoted he was running the car at 145...heating up the supercharger...not only that running the engine on a high load in such a high gear...puts alot of stress and work on the engine.....not the greatest idea to do on a FI car on a stock motor....

Ben
Well it is a gal, anyway, I guess that is the point if the engine is built up it doesn't address this area so if the engine is built up how will this be avoided?
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2004 | 02:57 PM
  #12  
G3po's Avatar
G3po
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,635
Likes: 0
From: Nor Cal.
Default

Originally posted by westpak
Well it is a gal, anyway, I guess that is the point if the engine is built up it doesn't address this area so if the engine is built up how will this be avoided?
ceramaic coating the main an rod bearings and running a very good synthetic oil (Redline, RP, Amsoil) are good precautions.
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2004 | 06:36 PM
  #13  
going deep's Avatar
going deep
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 430
Likes: 1
From: Nuclear Power
Default

Originally posted by G3po
ceramaic coating the main an rod bearings and running a very good synthetic oil (Redline, RP, Amsoil) are good precautions.
How will the ceramic coating on the bearings affect the clearances? Obviously make it tighter, but I mean should you order a smaller size and then coat it?
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2004 | 07:02 PM
  #14  
g356gear's Avatar
g356gear
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,222
Likes: 0
From: Man in the Sun
Default

I have seen something like this before with main bearings. The one photo of the upper half of the bearing still in the block. You can see severe pitting in the surface of the bearing itself. This looks exactly like a set that came out of an engine that had a serious over fueling problem. The excess fuel actually corrodes the bearing surfaces and breaks down the oil film coating that normally protects them. I would lay money that this was the reason why the bearings spun...excess fuel in the oil. While the motor is apart have you're machinist look at the piston rings....they are probably sharpened to a razor edge from lack of oil protection on the cylinder walls. If this was what the problem was then that would explain the good oil pressure up to the moment of the failure...the oil was still there just not able to do it's job anymore.

Last edited by g356gear; Dec 27, 2004 at 07:05 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2004 | 09:06 PM
  #15  
Sharif@Forged's Avatar
Sharif@Forged
Sponsor
Forged Performance
iTrader: (92)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 13,733
Likes: 1
From: Marietta, GA
Default

Originally posted by going deep
How will the ceramic coating on the bearings affect the clearances? Obviously make it tighter, but I mean should you order a smaller size and then coat it?
Your machine shop/engine builder will fit the bearings to the rods. Inform them that you want them ceramic coating, and they will do the rest.
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2004 | 10:13 PM
  #16  
Enron Exec's Avatar
Enron Exec
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,756
Likes: 0
From: Houston
Default

Originally posted by g356gear
I have seen something like this before with main bearings. The one photo of the upper half of the bearing still in the block. You can see severe pitting in the surface of the bearing itself. This looks exactly like a set that came out of an engine that had a serious over fueling problem. The excess fuel actually corrodes the bearing surfaces and breaks down the oil film coating that normally protects them. I would lay money that this was the reason why the bearings spun...excess fuel in the oil. While the motor is apart have you're machinist look at the piston rings....they are probably sharpened to a razor edge from lack of oil protection on the cylinder walls. If this was what the problem was then that would explain the good oil pressure up to the moment of the failure...the oil was still there just not able to do it's job anymore.
Thats a good point. Im going to have my oil tested by Blackstone after the motor build, even during the break in period, to watch what parts of the motor are wearing so to help avoid a total failure.
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2004 | 12:56 AM
  #17  
paul_kemshall's Avatar
paul_kemshall
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
From: UK
Default

The Crankshaft pin diameter per litre on the VQ engine is one of the smallest in the world. The reason for this was to optimise inertial mass and reduce friction. This is however not good for significant power increases.

Anyone know if you can get wider bearings or even larger diameters with a new crank?

Supra engines could have wider big end bearings ground on them. This made a significant difference to engine life...



Paul

Last edited by paul_kemshall; Dec 28, 2004 at 01:04 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2004 | 06:16 PM
  #18  
g356gear's Avatar
g356gear
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,222
Likes: 0
From: Man in the Sun
Default

Originally posted by paul_kemshall
The Crankshaft pin diameter per litre on the VQ engine is one of the smallest in the world. The reason for this was to optimise inertial mass and reduce friction. This is however not good for significant power increases.

Anyone know if you can get wider bearings or even larger diameters with a new crank?

Supra engines could have wider big end bearings ground on them. This made a significant difference to engine life...



Paul
The AEBS stoker kit may be you're only hope for a new crank with different bearing specs...but I doubt they will be much different.
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2004 | 02:29 PM
  #19  
JCat's Avatar
JCat
Thread Starter
---------------
Premier Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,996
Likes: 76
From: JC in Atlanta Georgia
Default

Was it a MAIN bearing failure or a ROD bearing failure?

A stroker crank will retain the stock main bearing diameter if I'm not mistaken.

Regarding the stroker, Popular Mechanics had a SUV shootout where they explained that the Pathfinder's engine is just a stroked 350Z engine (this month). It puts out much more torque of course.

I'm wondering if the Z's performance would benefit more from added torque vs added horsepower. This seems to be the path Nissan has chosen.
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2004 | 04:29 PM
  #20  
Enron Exec's Avatar
Enron Exec
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,756
Likes: 0
From: Houston
Default

Originally posted by jcn30127
Was it a MAIN bearing failure or a ROD bearing failure?

A stroker crank will retain the stock main bearing diameter if I'm not mistaken.

Regarding the stroker, Popular Mechanics had a SUV shootout where they explained that the Pathfinder's engine is just a stroked 350Z engine (this month). It puts out much more torque of course.

I'm wondering if the Z's performance would benefit more from added torque vs added horsepower. This seems to be the path Nissan has chosen.
I did a nation wide search for a VQ40 crank during my engine build but couldnt find one. Just as well because i want to keep things as simple as possible.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:07 PM.