Notices
Forced Induction Turbochargers and Superchargers..Got Boost?

500rwhp 11psi stock motor

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 27, 2005 | 09:51 AM
  #21  
More Power's Avatar
More Power
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
From: MD
Default

Hot damn! Nice results, whew!
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2005 | 09:52 AM
  #22  
t32gzz's Avatar
t32gzz
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 942
Likes: 0
From: Lewisville, TX
Default

I can list the people who made 450+ on stock internals, and none of them, including me ever blew a motor, but all are in the process of building or have sold their cars. I will agree that tuning will be the ultimate key, but it appears that other issues such as the crank angle wire and tuning may be to blame for the piles of mangled motors.

I think all will agree that for longevity, safety and high boost applications, forged internals is the way to go, not to mention the whimpy rods, but I must give credit where it is due.....

Very ballsy... and GREAT NUMBERS!!!!
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2005 | 10:18 AM
  #23  
calimarc's Avatar
calimarc
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
From: Northern California
Default

Originally posted by t32gzz
I think all will agree that for longevity, safety and high boost applications, forged internals is the way to go, not to mention the whimpy rods, but I must give credit where it is due.....
I think that is a fact
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2005 | 10:26 AM
  #24  
mr2fasterthanyo's Avatar
mr2fasterthanyo
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,751
Likes: 0
From: Chicago Burbs
Default

holy christ on a stick.

that is awesome.

where are you at in the chicago area? i think i might have to journey to charles' shop if you get that bad boy on the dyno..

and yes, with proper tuning, engines can handle a lot more power..... and that is something i have said many times... $1000 on dyno time is much better than having to rebuild an engine. both for the performance aspect and the not having to rebuild
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2005 | 11:16 AM
  #25  
mofoz's Avatar
mofoz
New Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,670
Likes: 1
From: Prospect Heights, IL
Default

awesome. chicago seems like the place to be for high hp 350z engines
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2005 | 11:38 AM
  #26  
ss350's Avatar
ss350
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 487
Likes: 0
From: Miami, Fl
Default

Understand the difference in scales.. However, wherever they cross don't they have to be equal? (Hp must = Tq at that point) If not why not? If they have to be equal and they are not then the scale absolute values are suspect.. Thanks
The Hp scale on the left is different from the tq scale on the right. The explanation is as simple as that. There is nothing "suspect" about the graph. Get over it! If the hp and tq scales were the same then they would cross at 5XXX (w/e the # is).
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2005 | 11:47 AM
  #27  
jpc350z's Avatar
jpc350z
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,041
Likes: 0
From: columbia md.
Default

Originally posted by ss350
The Hp scale on the left is different from the tq scale on the right. The explanation is as simple as that. There is nothing "suspect" about the graph. Get over it! If the hp and tq scales were the same then they would cross at 5XXX (w/e the # is).
???
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2005 | 11:50 AM
  #28  
ss350's Avatar
ss350
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 487
Likes: 0
From: Miami, Fl
Default

ur lost man..
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2005 | 12:42 PM
  #29  
kcobean's Avatar
kcobean
Premier Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 7,578
Likes: 2
From: Northern VA - USA
Default Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 500rwhp 11psi stock motor

Originally posted by jpc350z
Understand the difference in scales.. However, wherever they cross don't they have to be equal? (Hp must = Tq at that point) If not why not? If they have to be equal and they are not then the scale absolute values are suspect.. Thanks
If you look at the graph, the top of the torque scale is 462.4, where the top of the HP graph is 509.8. If you take the Torque graph and "squash it" so that the top of the torque graph (462.4) is horizontally in line with the 462.4 mark on the HP graph, you would see that the lines intersect in the 52xx range.

Because the scale is different for the torque curve, it lays on top of the HP graph differently than it would if they both topped out at the same number.

Make sense?
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2005 | 01:03 PM
  #30  
motown's Avatar
motown
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
From: Chi-Town Baby!
Default

man, i really gotta get out and see you and charles. i work in warrenville, so i have no excuses. are you guys close to Gerald Nissan?
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2005 | 01:09 PM
  #31  
calimarc's Avatar
calimarc
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
From: Northern California
Default Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 500rwhp 11psi stock motor

Originally posted by kcobean
If you look at the graph, the top of the torque scale is 462.4, where the top of the HP graph is 509.8. If you take the Torque graph and "squash it" so that the top of the torque graph (462.4) is horizontally in line with the 462.4 mark on the HP graph, you would see that the lines intersect in the 52xx range.

Because the scale is different for the torque curve, it lays on top of the HP graph differently than it would if they both topped out at the same number.

Make sense?
Great explanation...I even "get it" now. Thanks for taking the time to clarify a question. These boards are meant for learning
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2005 | 01:49 PM
  #32  
Enron Exec's Avatar
Enron Exec
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,756
Likes: 0
From: Houston
Default Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 500rwhp 11psi stock motor

Originally posted by calimarc
Great explanation...I even "get it" now. Thanks for taking the time to clarify a question. These boards are meant for learning
Words are by nature arbitrary. Numbers are definate.

(Torque x Engine speed) / 5,252 = Horsepower
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2005 | 01:56 PM
  #33  
calimarc's Avatar
calimarc
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
From: Northern California
Default Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 500rwhp 11psi stock motor

Originally posted by Enron Exec
Words are by nature arbitrary. Numbers are definate.

(Torque x Engine speed) / 5,252 = Horsepower
Hot Digga--DEE DOG

Bring on the scientific formulas!

Last edited by calimarc; Jan 27, 2005 at 02:00 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2005 | 02:01 PM
  #34  
sbcbaseball's Avatar
sbcbaseball
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 303
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Default Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 500rwhp 11psi stock motor

Nice numbers
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2005 | 02:06 PM
  #35  
thawk408's Avatar
thawk408
Registered User
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,939
Likes: 0
From: Nashville, TN
Default

Originally posted by mofoz
awesome. chicago seems like the place to be for high hp 350z engines
Chicago is the place for every high horsepower engine. There are so many fast cars there.
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2005 | 03:31 PM
  #36  
booger's Avatar
booger
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 10,500
Likes: 2
From: council bluffs Ia.
Default

Seems the F-con pro [ in the right hands ] is the ultimate tuning salution . There is a shop in town here , trying to get a dealership . If they do , even with my little SC ,Im going to try to get it .
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2005 | 05:03 PM
  #37  
zero2prove's Avatar
zero2prove
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
From: Illinois
Default

Booger,

F-con might be overkill for you setup. All you need is the right piggy back and you'll be fine. I was able to make good power without a standalone.
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2005 | 05:11 PM
  #38  
booger's Avatar
booger
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 10,500
Likes: 2
From: council bluffs Ia.
Default

I can make good power with the Split second piggyback . Thats not the problem . I live in Nebraska , extreme weather changes . Having to put in different maps for the weather isnt good and will never be the exact tune needed at that time . From what Ive read , the F-con pro is a tune it and forget it salution . It makes changes just as your cars stock ECU does for N/A cars . If Im wrong on this...some one correct me please !

Last edited by booger; Jan 27, 2005 at 05:20 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2005 | 05:31 PM
  #39  
Andy@Performance's Avatar
Andy@Performance
Sponsor
Performance Nissan
iTrader: (92)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 6,151
Likes: 0
From: Pasadena/Bay Area
Default

Im jealous!
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2005 | 08:02 PM
  #40  
APS's Avatar
APS
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,289
Likes: 0
From: Australia
Default

Originally posted by booger
It makes changes just as your cars stock ECU does for N/A cars . If Im wrong on this...some one correct me please !
Rarely if ever does an aftermarket computer offers superior compensation maps to that the stock Nissan Engine Control Unit, after market stand alone computers allow a good deal of flexability to tune engines though the stock ECU nearly always offers superior correction maps for ambient air temperature, barometric pressure, etc, etc.

Peter

Last edited by APS; Jan 27, 2005 at 08:06 PM.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:00 PM.