Thank you CJ Motorsports!!! New Dyno numbers.
Okay, for those of you who didn't know, I just drove my Z cross country from New Mexico to Connecticut without a scratch. (yeah, I gambled and got lucky!!). Along the way, I did a sea level retune on my built Z because I came from the "other mile high city" known as Albuquerque.
Comparison. Here's a great comparison between high altitude dynojet and a sea level dynojet.
To refresh you memory...
In Albuquerque (5500feet above sea level), at 17 psi, afr low 11s, timing being pulled 8-10 degrees...
Corrected SAE, 564rwhp
Uncorrected, 485 rwhp
In West Chicago (600feet above sea level), 17 psi, afr low 11s, timing 8-10 degrees
521rwhp!
So, for comparison's sake, the dyno jet in Albuquerque over corrected my numbers, HOWEVER, they were definately above the uncorrected amounts!!
After that little comparison, Charles tuned my Z for the following...
20 psi...~555rwhp consistent, with a peak of 569rwhp.
15psi....505rwhp
boost controller off, ~ 450rwhp.
Charles, please post one of my dynoes at high boost.
Thanks again Charles, you DA Mann!!
Ernie
Comparison. Here's a great comparison between high altitude dynojet and a sea level dynojet.
To refresh you memory...
In Albuquerque (5500feet above sea level), at 17 psi, afr low 11s, timing being pulled 8-10 degrees...
Corrected SAE, 564rwhp
Uncorrected, 485 rwhp
In West Chicago (600feet above sea level), 17 psi, afr low 11s, timing 8-10 degrees
521rwhp!
So, for comparison's sake, the dyno jet in Albuquerque over corrected my numbers, HOWEVER, they were definately above the uncorrected amounts!!
After that little comparison, Charles tuned my Z for the following...
20 psi...~555rwhp consistent, with a peak of 569rwhp.
15psi....505rwhp
boost controller off, ~ 450rwhp.
Charles, please post one of my dynoes at high boost.
Thanks again Charles, you DA Mann!!
Ernie
Last edited by going deep; May 11, 2005 at 04:51 PM.
Ernie:
Your experiement PROVES that the turbo cars do not lose as much power as NA cars at high altitude!!!!!
but then again, the corrected numbers were OVERcorrected..was charles' dyno a dynojet???
someone do some math here and come up with some ratios:
the dyno here overcorrected 8%
hmmm, still stand confused
we will never really know what the actual numbers are until a dyno tells us actual and not some guestimated actual based off of the inflated corrected numbers!
so, the mystery continues!!!! damn!!!!!
Your experiement PROVES that the turbo cars do not lose as much power as NA cars at high altitude!!!!!
someone do some math here and come up with some ratios:
the dyno here overcorrected 8%
hmmm, still stand confused
we will never really know what the actual numbers are until a dyno tells us actual and not some guestimated actual based off of the inflated corrected numbers!
so, the mystery continues!!!! damn!!!!!
Last edited by 350zDCalb; May 11, 2005 at 06:20 PM.
Trending Topics
Originally Posted by cjb80
Can you monitor the knock levels with the e-manage or are you just pulling out timing and hoping that it's enough?
Chris
Chris
Thanks everyone for the props, I am an orphan right now in Connecticut until I buy my laptop this weekend. I will be online more afterwards.
I am using emanage as mentioned before and pulling about 8-10 degreees of timing as I think someone already mentioned.
I am using emanage as mentioned before and pulling about 8-10 degreees of timing as I think someone already mentioned.
Originally Posted by cjb80
Can you monitor the knock levels with the e-manage or are you just pulling out timing and hoping that it's enough?
Chris
Chris
Tuning is much more than A/F ratios and timing. It's a complete strategy....everything needs to be checked and monitored to optimize power AND safety across the board.
A challenge with tuning a built motor is that the knock sensor often picks up piston slap (stuff you cant even hear over the roar of the motor and dyno), and thinks its knocking, and pulls timing.
Most of the time, street tuning requires a little but more timing retard than optimal, to leave a safety cushion for the street. But if you pull too much timing, its actually equally dangerous..if not more dangerous than having too much. EGT's go through the roof if you retard timing too much. And all the while, your A/F ratios will seem safely rich. (timing retard lowers A/F ratios). The result is usually a melted piston or cracked ring land.
Tricky stuff....isnt it?
Originally Posted by gq_626
You can monitor knock activity with many different devices. SAFC's, J&S, various scan tool devices.
Tuning is much more than A/F ratios and timing. It's a complete strategy....everything needs to be checked and monitored to optimize power AND safety across the board.
A challenge with tuning a built motor is that the knock sensor often picks up piston slap (stuff you cant even hear over the roar of the motor and dyno), and thinks its knocking, and pulls timing.
Most of the time, street tuning requires a little but more timing retard than optimal, to leave a safety cushion for the street. But if you pull too much timing, its actually equally dangerous..if not more dangerous than having too much. EGT's go through the roof if you retard timing too much. And all the while, your A/F ratios will seem safely rich. (timing retard lowers A/F ratios). The result is usually a melted piston or cracked ring land.
Tricky stuff....isnt it?
Tuning is much more than A/F ratios and timing. It's a complete strategy....everything needs to be checked and monitored to optimize power AND safety across the board.
A challenge with tuning a built motor is that the knock sensor often picks up piston slap (stuff you cant even hear over the roar of the motor and dyno), and thinks its knocking, and pulls timing.
Most of the time, street tuning requires a little but more timing retard than optimal, to leave a safety cushion for the street. But if you pull too much timing, its actually equally dangerous..if not more dangerous than having too much. EGT's go through the roof if you retard timing too much. And all the while, your A/F ratios will seem safely rich. (timing retard lowers A/F ratios). The result is usually a melted piston or cracked ring land.
Tricky stuff....isnt it?

a lot of tuning is counter intuitive.
going deep. are you pulling 10-12° straight across the rpm range, or varying by where you are at RPM wise? (for example pulling 13° @ low RPM and less at higher)
going deep. are you pulling 10-12° straight across the rpm range, or varying by where you are at RPM wise? (for example pulling 13° @ low RPM and less at higher)
Originally Posted by mr2fasterthanyo
a lot of tuning is counter intuitive.
going deep. are you pulling 10-12° straight across the rpm range, or varying by where you are at RPM wise? (for example pulling 13° @ low RPM and less at higher)
going deep. are you pulling 10-12° straight across the rpm range, or varying by where you are at RPM wise? (for example pulling 13° @ low RPM and less at higher)
TODD
Originally Posted by kcobean
Can you briefly explain why too much timing retard raises EGT's? Since pulling timing allows the piston to travel more of the downstroke before igniting the A/F charge, I would think the less compressed charge would burn cooler, not hotter. Apparently, it is tricky stuff, because that seems quite counter-intuitive. Thanks Sharif!
Now, lets say instead of 18 degrees of timing, you run 10 degrees. In this case, the compressed charge would not BEGIN burning until 10 degrees before TDC, so you have a highly pressurized charge that has begun burning way too late, and it ends up hanging around and burning up all the way through the power and exhuast stroke. So the end gases are SUPER hot....and very rich. They are richer than normal becuase they havent had a chance to burn completely....and that is why you can see very high EGT's but normal or richer than normal A/F ratios.
So there is a fine balance that has to be maintain on both ends of the spectrum. It's not just about setting an optimum A/F ratio...becuase there isnt one. It is just one component. But you can easily damage at motor at 11.0:1 with too muchy timing retard. Couple that with a slower burning 100 octane fuel and you have a blown torch inside your motor.

That's why I like to use both an EGT gauge, AND and wideband A/F gauge when tuning. That's my personal opinion.
Originally Posted by 350zDCalb
if he tuned similar to me, then he is only pulling the most timing in the 4500rmp range--where it advances most aggressively...throughout the rest of the range, pulling gradually
TODD
TODD
At 4500rpm, you are near the trq peak, which translates into peak cylinder pressure. This is the area where you need the most timing retard, and then beyond around 5500rpm, you should gradually start adding in a few degrees of timing, to keep EGT's down, and flatten the trq curve, and keep power increasing power towards redline.
It's a really good idea to hook up an OBDII diagnostic tool that can view and log ignition timing, coolant temp, and other variables while tuning. It takes some of the guess work out of the equation....especially when using a piggyback type EMS.



