True Dual 2.5" Exhaust Options?
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 207
Likes: 0
From: Southwest Florida
I am looking for a true dual exhaust for the Z which is 2.5" all the way back. As far as I know, APS is the only option, are there any other exhausts available? How do they compare?
Thanks!
Chris
Thanks!
Chris
HKS has a true dual 2.5" also, just put one on a customers car and it sounds INCREDIBLE, has titanium tips, and is full polished stainless, it fit up perfect, and the tips have about 1" of adjustment to suit your tastes for how far they stick out. part # 32009-BN001 i believe... its a bit expensive tho with MSRP at 1895... you might be able to find it for around 1500... its the only dual 2.5" that I know of that uses a twin straight thru canister mufflers rather then a stockish looking one like the APS and my borla.
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 207
Likes: 0
From: Southwest Florida
So I am leaning towards the APS 2.5" true dual exhaust at this point, with test pipes.
I have been thinking about this subject alot though. I built an S2000 which pushed 559 rwhp at 23 psi of boost with a 3" exhaust system. So that is 2 liters, 4 cylinders being pushed out of a 3" pipe at ~9400 rpm. I am shooting for similar power, with less boost, and pump gas.
Now I have a 3.5 liter motor with two 2.5" pipes, so that's 1.75 liters with 3 cylinders out of 2.5" at say, 7000 rpm. I am not sure how much the max RPM of the motor matters, or the number of cylinders in this scenario... but:
The equation for an area of a circle is a = (pi)r(squared) -- however you write it out.
The area of a 2.5" pipe is 4.90625", the area of a 3" pipe is 7.065". The difference between the two is 31%. The difference in displacement from 2 liters to 1.75 is only ~13% however, so the 2.5" pipe is still somewhat smaller - relatively - even though there are two of them.
The question is though will the two 2.5" pipes be enough for 550 rwhp? Will it be enough for 600 rwhp? I am not really interested in much more than that honestly...
What do you guys think?
Thanks
Chris
I have been thinking about this subject alot though. I built an S2000 which pushed 559 rwhp at 23 psi of boost with a 3" exhaust system. So that is 2 liters, 4 cylinders being pushed out of a 3" pipe at ~9400 rpm. I am shooting for similar power, with less boost, and pump gas.
Now I have a 3.5 liter motor with two 2.5" pipes, so that's 1.75 liters with 3 cylinders out of 2.5" at say, 7000 rpm. I am not sure how much the max RPM of the motor matters, or the number of cylinders in this scenario... but:
The equation for an area of a circle is a = (pi)r(squared) -- however you write it out.
The area of a 2.5" pipe is 4.90625", the area of a 3" pipe is 7.065". The difference between the two is 31%. The difference in displacement from 2 liters to 1.75 is only ~13% however, so the 2.5" pipe is still somewhat smaller - relatively - even though there are two of them.
The question is though will the two 2.5" pipes be enough for 550 rwhp? Will it be enough for 600 rwhp? I am not really interested in much more than that honestly...
What do you guys think?
Thanks
Chris
Trending Topics
Originally Posted by cjb80
So I am leaning towards the APS 2.5" true dual exhaust at this point, with test pipes.
I have been thinking about this subject alot though. I built an S2000 which pushed 559 rwhp at 23 psi of boost with a 3" exhaust system. So that is 2 liters, 4 cylinders being pushed out of a 3" pipe at ~9400 rpm. I am shooting for similar power, with less boost, and pump gas.
Now I have a 3.5 liter motor with two 2.5" pipes, so that's 1.75 liters with 3 cylinders out of 2.5" at say, 7000 rpm. I am not sure how much the max RPM of the motor matters, or the number of cylinders in this scenario... but:
The equation for an area of a circle is a = (pi)r(squared) -- however you write it out.
The area of a 2.5" pipe is 4.90625", the area of a 3" pipe is 7.065". The difference between the two is 31%. The difference in displacement from 2 liters to 1.75 is only ~13% however, so the 2.5" pipe is still somewhat smaller - relatively - even though there are two of them.
The question is though will the two 2.5" pipes be enough for 550 rwhp? Will it be enough for 600 rwhp? I am not really interested in much more than that honestly...
What do you guys think?
Thanks
Chris
I have been thinking about this subject alot though. I built an S2000 which pushed 559 rwhp at 23 psi of boost with a 3" exhaust system. So that is 2 liters, 4 cylinders being pushed out of a 3" pipe at ~9400 rpm. I am shooting for similar power, with less boost, and pump gas.
Now I have a 3.5 liter motor with two 2.5" pipes, so that's 1.75 liters with 3 cylinders out of 2.5" at say, 7000 rpm. I am not sure how much the max RPM of the motor matters, or the number of cylinders in this scenario... but:
The equation for an area of a circle is a = (pi)r(squared) -- however you write it out.
The area of a 2.5" pipe is 4.90625", the area of a 3" pipe is 7.065". The difference between the two is 31%. The difference in displacement from 2 liters to 1.75 is only ~13% however, so the 2.5" pipe is still somewhat smaller - relatively - even though there are two of them.
The question is though will the two 2.5" pipes be enough for 550 rwhp? Will it be enough for 600 rwhp? I am not really interested in much more than that honestly...
What do you guys think?
Thanks
Chris
for comparisons sake, what's people's opinion on one of the bigger 3" Y pipe design like the nismo or fubijitso for FI?
the area of dual 2.5" exhaust = 9.8125"
single 3" = 7.065"
the area of dual 2.5" exhaust = 9.8125"
single 3" = 7.065"
Realisically, on our 3.5L V6, anything above 2.5 inch true dual will provide no benifit.
Like Phunk, I am also running mid 500'whp range through the Greddy Evo2 exhuast, which is 2.25 at best....
Like Phunk, I am also running mid 500'whp range through the Greddy Evo2 exhuast, which is 2.25 at best....
Chris in terms of exhaust system performance on a turbocharged engine you really need to look/measure the exhaust back pressure - an ideal exhaust system should have near zero exhaust back pressure at peak power.
Exhaust tube diameter is always one important factor to consider though in reality you need to consider tube diameter and muffler flow in combination as both of these parameters impact on gas flow and exhaust back pressure, hope this helps.
Peter
Exhaust tube diameter is always one important factor to consider though in reality you need to consider tube diameter and muffler flow in combination as both of these parameters impact on gas flow and exhaust back pressure, hope this helps.
Peter
Originally Posted by cjb80
I am looking for a true dual exhaust for the Z which is 2.5" all the way back. As far as I know, APS is the only option, are there any other exhausts available? How do they compare?
Thanks!
Chris
Thanks!
Chris
How about two 3" cut outs? Got this off another post. Check out the vid on the bottom of the page right side. looks pretty cool.
http://www.atpturbo.com/root/releases/release091004.htm
http://www.atpturbo.com/root/releases/release091004.htm
IMHO the 350z is already a fairly complex vehicle. added complexity leaves more room for problems. gadgets should be avoided by all costs... i would rather just get a decent exhaust that will allow me to make good power all the time... to add in cutouts sounds like a pain, they might leak? i would rather just remove my exhaust before going to the track and save weight while im at it before running a cutout... thats just me tho... to each their own. i keep my exhaust on anyway... i like to hear what going on with the engine if i can.
Originally Posted by cjb80
The question is though will the two 2.5" pipes be enough for 550 rwhp? Will it be enough for 600 rwhp? Chris
Peter
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lt_Ballzacki
Brakes & Suspension
39
Aug 6, 2021 06:19 AM








