Notices
Forced Induction Turbochargers and Superchargers..Got Boost?

FI system weight - noticeable?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 8, 2005 | 09:36 PM
  #21  
WA2GOOD's Avatar
WA2GOOD
Banned
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,474
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
Default

Originally Posted by sentry65
I noticed losing 30 lbs (battery and SSV manifold)

I'm sure you'll notice gaining 80-100 lbs
Not when your adding 100 or so WHP. At thay rate, it is a whole new car!
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2005 | 09:57 PM
  #22  
DBZ33's Avatar
DBZ33
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 537
Likes: 0
From: Des Plaines, IL.
Default

Originally Posted by sentry65
I noticed losing 30 lbs (battery and SSV manifold)

I'm sure you'll notice gaining 80-100 lbs
I find it very hard to believe that you noticed a 30lb loss.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2005 | 10:02 PM
  #23  
ether's Avatar
ether
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 694
Likes: 0
Default

you can relocate the battery to the rear.. dicth the AC and power steering items if you want to regain the weight distribution.. or just adjust your suspension to deal with the slightly different weight distribution.. but unless you are seriously racing the car, the weight is not something that is of concern as the impact is minimal in nature
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2005 | 10:03 PM
  #24  
WA2GOOD's Avatar
WA2GOOD
Banned
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,474
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
Default

Originally Posted by DBZ33
I find it very hard to believe that you noticed a 30lb loss.
.........+1.....mind over matter, I guess
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2005 | 01:40 AM
  #25  
overZealous1's Avatar
overZealous1
Registered User
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,268
Likes: 1
From: tigard oregon
Default

Originally Posted by prescience
Yeah and that WILL make a difference to performance since straightline acceleration is proportional to rotational acceleration of wheels.

Rotational wheel acceleration is proportional to inertia of final drive, a part of which will be inertia of wheels which i turn depends on mass. But it also depends on mass distribution across the wheel and the less mass at the edges the better compared to the centre.


Phew sorry
ok, sorry to pick on ya, but what does inertia have to do with the final drive? and air pressure and alignment and back spacing decides what part of the wheel it is going to see more stress.
finally i figured out what you were trying to say. larger wheels and tires have more weight towards the outside because of larger diameter. thus needing more force to turn them as compared to a smaller wheel. inertia has nothing to do with it. inertia is a constant force, and inertia will only come into play on braking. inertia is only being created on acceleration or constant movement. what you are talking about is torque, to get the larger dia. tires spinning.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2005 | 01:50 AM
  #26  
overZealous1's Avatar
overZealous1
Registered User
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,268
Likes: 1
From: tigard oregon
Default

only the people SERIOUSLY setting up a track car will notice ANY weight movement. this car needs to be pushed hard to get to the limit, and you will not find it on the street. sure you can slide it and stuff, but try doing a 100mph 4 wheel slide and steer with the throttle. to do this in the Z means hitting a 30-40mph turn with the best hopes you know the road.
if anyone can notice the difference with f/i, then they will know how to drive the car to make up for it. if you feel the difference, put another 1/2 degree of camber on the front suspension and it will all go away!
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2005 | 08:07 AM
  #27  
halitosis's Avatar
halitosis
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 452
Likes: 0
From: Portland, Oregon
Default

Originally Posted by WA2GOOD
Not when your adding 100 or so WHP. At thay rate, it is a whole new car!
I see your points about how hp would offset any negative effects of skewing the weight distribution. But if you have a faster/more powerful car, you would certainly notice those things even more. I think the point is 70-100lbs is not enough to notice - however, if it were enough to notice, then you would certainly amplify the the negative effects of the skewed weight distribution with a more powerful car.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2005 | 08:09 AM
  #28  
halitosis's Avatar
halitosis
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 452
Likes: 0
From: Portland, Oregon
Default

Originally Posted by ether
you can relocate the battery to the rear.. dicth the AC and power steering items if you want to regain the weight distribution.. or just adjust your suspension to deal with the slightly different weight distribution.. but unless you are seriously racing the car, the weight is not something that is of concern as the impact is minimal in nature
That's too hardcore. I just want a faster car that does not compromise street/comfort civility too much. At the same time, I do put a premium on handling dynamics, which is why I raised the issue in the first place.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2005 | 08:10 AM
  #29  
zman1910's Avatar
zman1910
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,895
Likes: 0
From: NY
Default

In a straight line I could barely tell but once you hit a corner.....it could easily be felt.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2005 | 08:38 AM
  #30  
sentry65's Avatar
sentry65
the burninator
Premier Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 9,722
Likes: 2
From: phoenix, AZ
Default

Originally Posted by DBZ33
I find it very hard to believe that you noticed a 30lb loss.
well I did, just believe it. The car felt a little quicker with it's steering. 30 lbs up high like that is for sure noticable. It lowers the center of gravity, makes weight transfer faster etc. I even noticed there was a bigger gap between the front tires and body. 30 lbs is a lot. It's enough to gain .03 sec in the quarter mile which in itself isn't hugely noticable, but taking any weight up high from the front of the car really is noticable with it's handling. Who here can't tell the difference in traction when they take the spare tire out of the rear?

Originally Posted by WA2GOOD
Not when your adding 100 or so WHP. At thay rate, it is a whole new car!

I'm talking about handling. Obviously the weight gain is negated by the power gain in a straight line

Last edited by sentry65; Dec 9, 2005 at 08:45 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2005 | 08:51 AM
  #31  
SinCity350Z's Avatar
SinCity350Z
Track Whore
Premier Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,954
Likes: 2
From: North Las Vegas
Default

How about this...I have a full track 350Z and it is getting twin turboed right now. When it gets back, I will tell you if I felt the difference on the track...
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2005 | 09:16 AM
  #32  
Blake350z's Avatar
Blake350z
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
From: Savage, Minnesota
Default

I think when i got my APS ST it read 120lbs. So i think you TT guys gotta be closer to 150lbs.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2005 | 09:23 AM
  #33  
sentry65's Avatar
sentry65
the burninator
Premier Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 9,722
Likes: 2
From: phoenix, AZ
Default

hmm yeah, and you gotta fill up the intercooler with fluid.

the TT kit takes off the stock headers though, but in the end should still be 20 lbs? heavier than a ST setup. At least the weight is low for the most part. The intercooler being so far up front is gonna weigh the handling down a little, but not horrible or anything
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2005 | 09:25 AM
  #34  
halitosis's Avatar
halitosis
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 452
Likes: 0
From: Portland, Oregon
Default

Originally Posted by sentry65
hmm yeah, and you gotta fill up the intercooler with fluid.

the TT kit takes off the stock headers though, but in the end should still be 20 lbs? heavier than a ST setup. At least the weight is low for the most part. The intercooler being so far up front is gonna weigh the handling down a little, but not horrible or anything
Is the stock piece an "exhuast manifold" or a true equal-length header? Semantics only?
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2005 | 09:38 AM
  #35  
sentry65's Avatar
sentry65
the burninator
Premier Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 9,722
Likes: 2
From: phoenix, AZ
Default

not sure i get what you're asking, the stock headers have really short runners. Not sure if they're truely equal length or not - assuming they are though.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2005 | 11:00 AM
  #36  
SinCity350Z's Avatar
SinCity350Z
Track Whore
Premier Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,954
Likes: 2
From: North Las Vegas
Default

halitosis - The Stock piece is a manifold not a header.

sentry65 - The difference between a manifold and a header is the length of the runners. Headers are equal length and manifolds are not.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2005 | 11:08 AM
  #37  
sentry65's Avatar
sentry65
the burninator
Premier Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 9,722
Likes: 2
From: phoenix, AZ
Default

ah ok, I didn't know there was a difference, that's cool. good to know
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2005 | 11:27 AM
  #38  
taurran's Avatar
taurran
Registered User
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 9,482
Likes: 0
From: .
Default

With the ST I couldn't really tell a difference. What I could tell a difference in was TRACTION.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2005 | 11:33 AM
  #39  
nissansource's Avatar
nissansource
Registered User
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,731
Likes: 0
From: Performance LAND
Default

take a poop you will run better times at the track!
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2005 | 02:27 AM
  #40  
prescience's Avatar
prescience
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
From: Across the Pond United Kingdom
Default

Just for the record 'moment of inertia' is what I'm on about; like an ice skater spins faster with arms at side than with arms out
http://theory.uwinnipeg.ca/physics/rot/node5.html

Originally Posted by overZealous1
ok, sorry to pick on ya, but what does inertia have to do with the final drive? and air pressure and alignment and back spacing decides what part of the wheel it is going to see more stress.
finally i figured out what you were trying to say. larger wheels and tires have more weight towards the outside because of larger diameter. thus needing more force to turn them as compared to a smaller wheel. inertia has nothing to do with it. inertia is a constant force, and inertia will only come into play on braking. inertia is only being created on acceleration or constant movement. what you are talking about is torque, to get the larger dia. tires spinning.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:18 AM.