Notices
Forced Induction Turbochargers and Superchargers..Got Boost?

413 RWHP ...yay

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 09:16 AM
  #1  
zul8r's Avatar
zul8r
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 371
Likes: 0
From: New York/Virginia Beach
Default 413 RWHP ...yay

413.1 RWHP 368.2 RWTQ on mustang dyno Not tuned!! anyone got higher here in Long Island or am I tops?? haha

Last edited by zul8r; Dec 22, 2005 at 09:49 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 09:17 AM
  #2  
MIAPLAYA's Avatar
MIAPLAYA
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 11,373
Likes: 0
From: Escondido
Default

What F/I kit is that?
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 09:20 AM
  #3  
AndysAutoSport's Avatar
AndysAutoSport
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
From: Milpitas, CA, USA.
Default

What kit and PSI are you running?

Those are really good gains, I broke barely over 400RWHP in my 240SX, running a GT2871R at 16PSI.

Good stuff man!
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 12:53 PM
  #4  
blkevo8's Avatar
blkevo8
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas
Default

nice numbers especially being untuned. did you do a ny dyno tuning after the initial numbers?
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 12:59 PM
  #5  
Zilvia's Avatar
Zilvia
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,205
Likes: 0
From: Lima, Ohio
Default

kit?
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 01:20 PM
  #6  
zul8r's Avatar
zul8r
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 371
Likes: 0
From: New York/Virginia Beach
Default

pe tt
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 02:40 PM
  #7  
DBZ33's Avatar
DBZ33
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 537
Likes: 0
From: Des Plaines, IL.
Default

Originally Posted by zul8r
413.1 RWHP 368.2 RWTQ on mustang dyno Not tuned!! anyone got higher here in Long Island or am I tops?? haha

Mustang dyno always reads higher. Nice numbers for low boost.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 02:41 PM
  #8  
vq35carel's Avatar
vq35carel
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
From: CA,OC
Default

Its A Nice Day For Power Enterprise Congrats
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 02:59 PM
  #9  
booger's Avatar
booger
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 10,500
Likes: 2
From: council bluffs Ia.
Default

Originally Posted by DBZ33
Mustang dyno always reads higher. Nice numbers for low boost.
GET YOUR FACTS STRAIGHT DUDE


Great #'s enjoy the ride
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 03:07 PM
  #10  
neffster's Avatar
neffster
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 541
Likes: 0
From: Oviedo, FL
Default

Originally Posted by booger
GET YOUR FACTS STRAIGHT DUDE


Great #'s enjoy the ride
LOL.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 03:08 PM
  #11  
backagain's Avatar
backagain
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,029
Likes: 0
From: Ft Walton Beach FL
Default

Originally Posted by booger
GET YOUR FACTS STRAIGHT DUDE


Great #'s enjoy the ride
according to this thread he isn't wrong, just not as extreme as he made it out to be.

https://my350z.com/forum/forced-induction/123014-dyno-comparison-thread.html
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 03:22 PM
  #12  
booger's Avatar
booger
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 10,500
Likes: 2
From: council bluffs Ia.
Default

Originally Posted by backagain
according to this thread he isn't wrong, just not as extreme as he made it out to be.

https://my350z.com/forum/showthread.php?t=123014

The guy never said...Mustang dyno's always run higher than [ dyno type ] . And even then they never say if the numbers were adjusted to read DynoJet numbers . Which seems to be what every one compares to.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 03:26 PM
  #13  
Willie Dynamite's Avatar
Willie Dynamite
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
From: W.C.,PA
Default

A mustang dyno reads lower than a dynojet.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 03:26 PM
  #14  
MIAPLAYA's Avatar
MIAPLAYA
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 11,373
Likes: 0
From: Escondido
Default

Originally Posted by booger
The guy never said...Mustang dyno's always run higher than [ dyno type ] . And even then they never say if the numbers were adjusted to read DynoJet numbers . Which seems to be what every one compares to.
Actually Mustangs are funny dynos...typically you see lower numbers from them then you would on a Dynojet. But Mustangs are easy to tamper with and alter to make higher numbers. Simply inputting the weight of the car as lower can get you much higher numbers then they really are. A few years back when the Spec Vs first came out there was a guy who dyno'd at actual weight and made like 137 FWHP then inputted a lower weight and made 161 . Both were bone stock dynos run back to back...
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 03:27 PM
  #15  
DBZ33's Avatar
DBZ33
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 537
Likes: 0
From: Des Plaines, IL.
Default

Originally Posted by booger
GET YOUR FACTS STRAIGHT DUDE


Great #'s enjoy the ride

Your right. I was thinking the other way around. Sorry.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 03:34 PM
  #16  
Sharif@Forged's Avatar
Sharif@Forged
Sponsor
Forged Performance
iTrader: (92)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 13,733
Likes: 1
From: Marietta, GA
Default

Without any correction, they read lower than DynoJets. Many Mustang an other load based dyno operators will adjust the numbers to replicate DynoJet numbers. Whether or not the operator will tell you this.....hmmmm

What kind of FI kit is this??
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 03:34 PM
  #17  
zul8r's Avatar
zul8r
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 371
Likes: 0
From: New York/Virginia Beach
Default

the weight put in was 3625. I know that is way off...so would i get higher or lower numbers if the right weight was put in?
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 03:40 PM
  #18  
booger's Avatar
booger
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 10,500
Likes: 2
From: council bluffs Ia.
Default

Originally Posted by MIAPLAYA
Actually Mustangs are funny dynos...typically you see lower numbers from them then you would on a Dynojet. But Mustangs are easy to tamper with and alter to make higher numbers. Simply inputting the weight of the car as lower can get you much higher numbers then they really are. A few years back when the Spec Vs first came out there was a guy who dyno'd at actual weight and made like 137 FWHP then inputted a lower weight and made 161 . Both were bone stock dynos run back to back...
exactly....I have them put in that my G35 is 3700lb's....3500lb's for the car , and 200lb's for my fat a$$ . It will have to go up another 25lb's when I dyno again . My a$$ is getting bigger
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 04:29 PM
  #19  
MIAPLAYA's Avatar
MIAPLAYA
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 11,373
Likes: 0
From: Escondido
Default

Originally Posted by booger
exactly....I have them put in that my G35 is 3700lb's....3500lb's for the car , and 200lb's for my fat a$$ . It will have to go up another 25lb's when I dyno again . My a$$ is getting bigger
LOL....

Again if the weight is lower it places less load on the dyno and gets you bigger numbers... Putting in the correct weight gets you lower then Dynojet numbers.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 04:37 PM
  #20  
backagain's Avatar
backagain
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,029
Likes: 0
From: Ft Walton Beach FL
Default

Originally Posted by Sharif@Forged
Without any correction, they read lower than DynoJets. Many Mustang an other load based dyno operators will adjust the numbers to replicate DynoJet numbers. Whether or not the operator will tell you this.....hmmmm

What kind of FI kit is this??

PE TT, ( post #6, come on sharif, you are slacking)

Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:00 PM.