on 2 guys garage they put a rear mount turbo on a vette, work on a z?
#21
they claim to have full boost by 3000. i know domestics down here in florida with them and they love them. they dont have lag problems like you think they would. they say that they use different kind of turbos that wouldnt work up front in standard location.
im not a turbo expert and i said this was my opinion and i copied all that info off of their site....
im not a turbo expert and i said this was my opinion and i copied all that info off of their site....
#22
Originally Posted by ChromeZilver
This has been the debate with STS every since they came out. And you scholars can debate the details all you want, all ll I know is that it works and works well. The fact that they are still in business and blowing peoples minds and conceptions with the "remote mount" system is more then enough for me. That and my friends turbo'd Camaro SS and Z06 that I have driven and experienced. The power is so sweet it's almost disgusting! They are doing a kit for the 350Z, it's on their website, and it will be out this summer I'm told.
Last edited by MIAPLAYA; 04-26-2006 at 11:57 AM.
#24
well when i saw that show and posted this on here i was just thinking how much cheaper this kit must be due to the less install time. Ive been reading all the posts and didnt realise all the problems possible with this setup. Sooooooooooo.........i just went to the sts site, got the phone # and called them, ended up talking to a guy about the upcoming 350z kit (its listed on the sts website). He said its in the works as we speak.......its to be a single turbo kit, with intercooler and some type of emanage/reflash, etc. He said it should make horsepower comparable to the other kits, theyre looking at a base psi of 5 and maybe going to 8 or 9, theyre looking at a probable price range of around 5 to 6. He said the install will be much easier than the other systems like the vette.........and he said the lag is about .05 of a second to charge the pipe, so theres not going to be much lag to speak of. He also said theyre looking at ways to tuck it into the fenderwell for a clean install thats out of the way. I guess the thing that drew me to the possibility of this kit is how much cheaper it should be, i mean you read the testimonials on the website and people are installing themselves using a set of jackstands and it bolts on. Im no car expert what so ever.......but this is something im defiitely going to be watching for.
#25
Originally Posted by scottycoyote
well when i saw that show and posted this on here i was just thinking how much cheaper this kit must be due to the less install time. Ive been reading all the posts and didnt realise all the problems possible with this setup. Sooooooooooo.........i just went to the sts site, got the phone # and called them, ended up talking to a guy about the upcoming 350z kit (its listed on the sts website). He said its in the works as we speak.......its to be a single turbo kit, with intercooler and some type of emanage/reflash, etc. He said it should make horsepower comparable to the other kits, theyre looking at a base psi of 5 and maybe going to 8 or 9, theyre looking at a probable price range of around 5 to 6. He said the install will be much easier than the other systems like the vette.........and he said the lag is about .05 of a second to charge the pipe, so theres not going to be much lag to speak of. He also said theyre looking at ways to tuck it into the fenderwell for a clean install thats out of the way. I guess the thing that drew me to the possibility of this kit is how much cheaper it should be, i mean you read the testimonials on the website and people are installing themselves using a set of jackstands and it bolts on. Im no car expert what so ever.......but this is something im defiitely going to be watching for.
#26
this might make for some interesting dual FI setups - like a supercharger with a turbo if you could get a huge intercooler and piping setup going.
I guess the turbo piping would go by where the exhaust is?
I guess the turbo piping would go by where the exhaust is?
#27
Originally Posted by sentry65
this might make for some interesting dual FI setups - like a supercharger with a turbo if you could get a huge intercooler and piping setup going.
I guess the turbo piping would go by where the exhaust is?
I guess the turbo piping would go by where the exhaust is?
#30
audiblemayhem, I didn’t mean to insult you. I’m sorry if I did. I had the feeling you were quoting the manufacturer.
With proper engineering, pretty much any system can be made to work.
I can’t access the web site from here. How much boost is that thing making anyway on the Vette? Getting full boost at 3000 rpm on a + 5 liter engine might be impressive if it was more than 14 psi. It’s nothing to brag about if it only 5-6 psi.
The Subaru guys are at full boost well below 3000rpm from a dead start. Some of my friends are there before 2000.
I’m not in the market for a FI. If I was that thing would be dead last. I wish we could have a good S/C as it’s more flexible than a turbo. But bang for the buck, the turbo is still unbeatable…
With proper engineering, pretty much any system can be made to work.
I can’t access the web site from here. How much boost is that thing making anyway on the Vette? Getting full boost at 3000 rpm on a + 5 liter engine might be impressive if it was more than 14 psi. It’s nothing to brag about if it only 5-6 psi.
The Subaru guys are at full boost well below 3000rpm from a dead start. Some of my friends are there before 2000.
I’m not in the market for a FI. If I was that thing would be dead last. I wish we could have a good S/C as it’s more flexible than a turbo. But bang for the buck, the turbo is still unbeatable…
#31
how is s/c more flexible than turbo?
Choosing the right size turbo for your goals will easily make an engine more useable and more powerful than a comparable s/c setup. Better efficiency in all aspects.
Choosing the right size turbo for your goals will easily make an engine more useable and more powerful than a comparable s/c setup. Better efficiency in all aspects.
#33
so what exactly is the debate going on here:
will a set up like this actually work on the z?
or
How much lag would it have?...tho i dont really se a prob with having a lil lag
but it would be nicer if they made it a Twin Turbo set up.......
will a set up like this actually work on the z?
or
How much lag would it have?...tho i dont really se a prob with having a lil lag
but it would be nicer if they made it a Twin Turbo set up.......
#35
Originally Posted by chimmike
how is s/c more flexible than turbo?
let's not get into that SC vs turbo debate...they have their respective good and bad points and people coming from differnt situations who do different types of driving have different criteria
Last edited by sentry65; 04-26-2006 at 12:52 PM.
#36
Originally Posted by chimmike
how is s/c more flexible than turbo?
Choosing the right size turbo for your goals will easily make an engine more useable and more powerful than a comparable s/c setup. Better efficiency in all aspects.
Choosing the right size turbo for your goals will easily make an engine more useable and more powerful than a comparable s/c setup. Better efficiency in all aspects.
No lag, torque is available at all rpm.
It run cooler (Much cooler in the case of a Lysholm unit)
Less hardware
The whole torque curve is moved up (no need for different gearing)
No chance of over boost
The big disadvantage of the S/C vs the Turbo is the market. Used turbos can be had for peanuts, it cool to have one so many people wants them so plenty of manufacturer makes them, tuners abound.
Let’s say that the turbo has won the development race. Making it more accessible.
I still wish for a S/C :-)
#37
Originally Posted by sentry65
let's not get into that SC vs turbo debate...they have their respective good and bad points and people coming from differnt situations who do different types of driving have different criteria
#38
on paper there's no lag, but in the real world, centrifugal s/cs (the only ones worth getting IMO) have essentially what is lag. Runs cooler? It may run cooler but the air charge is hotter than that of a turbo due to the nature of the units, a turbo's compressed charge is cooler than that of a s/c due to the efficiency of compression.
Like I said before, turbo choice is everything. If you smartly put together a setup, it will out-do an equivalent s/c in all aspects. It's as simple as that.
there's plenty of proof out there to back me up...I'm sure you know this too
Like I said before, turbo choice is everything. If you smartly put together a setup, it will out-do an equivalent s/c in all aspects. It's as simple as that.
there's plenty of proof out there to back me up...I'm sure you know this too
#39
Originally Posted by sentry65
let's not get into that SC vs turbo debate...they have their respective good and bad points and people coming from differnt situations who do different types of driving have different criteria
#40
ill stick with nitrous for now...
no offense taken kolia, i wasnt even sure what you were talking about actually. i dont know enough about the physics part of turbos to argue with anyone. i was just stating what they said and had my own opinion at the beginning of the thread...
no offense taken kolia, i wasnt even sure what you were talking about actually. i dont know enough about the physics part of turbos to argue with anyone. i was just stating what they said and had my own opinion at the beginning of the thread...