Notices
Forced Induction Turbochargers and Superchargers..Got Boost?

turbo owners please help especially "jwt" owners take a look

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 15, 2006 | 07:06 AM
  #61  
taurran's Avatar
taurran
Registered User
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 9,482
Likes: 0
From: .
Default

Ouch. JWT TT + Tilton flywheel =

That's really the problem with many of the TT setups at the drag strip, in my opinion. Getting traction is exceedingly hard when you're building boost so soon. You're going to trap higher due to the fact that you will be making more power with less boost on two smaller more efficient turbos, but controlling that power becomes a problem, especially on street radials. I've seen more novice drivers run fast ET's on ST's as traction is more managable. It's clearly the more streetable of the two for the typical driver.

That being said, it isn't boost level that blows motors, it's all factors combined. TT's are more efficient, meaning they make more power at lower boost due to the fact that they can flow more air. A ST needs slightly more boost at lower boost levels to make the same power, but that doesn't mean that it is more prone to blowing the motor by any means.
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2006 | 07:12 AM
  #62  
k3silk's Avatar
k3silk
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,473
Likes: 0
From: MD
Default

Originally Posted by TheCajunStyle
Just figured I'd like to give a little input since I've tracked my JWT TT a few times this year...

Alberto is right, not too many TT owners are gonna come here to talk about their high 12 / low 13 ETs.

I will.

Last night was my third time ever at the track. My best run yet is a 12.7@111 with a 1.9 60' and 87mph at the 1/8 mile. This is with 384whp/338tq @ 6.8psi on Nitto 555Rs. A lot of the reason that I'm having trouble getting a lower ET is because of my Tilton clutch--it's either on/off and you can't really slip it at all. I either peel out all the way through 2nd or bog really bad. (yeah, I need more practice--simple as that)...I also need to explore getting a 3.3 final drive--I hit the rev limiter in 4th gear every single time with about 300ft to go--not enough time to shift into 5th. I know my trap could be a little higher--maybe 112-113.

All I'm trying to say is, out of the box, I'm happy, but there is always room for improvement

One of the biggest things that I like about the JWT TT setup is the low psi that the out of the box tune is set to--6.8psi. I think it's one of the better kits as far as amount of power produced at such a low psi. On a non-built engine, this also eases my worries (a little bit) of throwing a rod.

I'm not trying to be biased against any other kits at all--I'd love to own a ST setup as well. For the amount of money you put into a TT setup, you could put the same into a ST setup--yet end up with even more power. Everything has it's advantages/disadvantages.

One thing that I do encourage you to do though is to get an exhaust and test pipes with your turbo setup. You need to make the exhaust more free flowing to get those EGTs down. If you're going to get the JWT TT kit installed, go to a shop that has at least done a dozen installs of this particular kit...The reliablilty is determined by the success of the install.

Hope this helps your decision process.
you can only buy the jwt kit if it is installed at a shop that they allow and the only one in my area is aam. also as far as exhaust goes i wanted to keep my stock exhaust and cat will this be a problem with going with any FI?
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2006 | 07:14 AM
  #63  
taurran's Avatar
taurran
Registered User
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 9,482
Likes: 0
From: .
Default

Originally Posted by k3silk
you can only buy the jwt kit if it is installed at a shop that they allow and the only one in my area is aam. also as far as exhaust goes i wanted to keep my stock exhaust and cat will this be a problem with going with any FI?
It can be done... but isn't the ideal setup by any means. It will rob a lot of power and put more strain on the motor (heat wise).
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2006 | 07:20 AM
  #64  
silvrhand's Avatar
silvrhand
Lost in Transit
Premier Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 10,003,830
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
Default

thread closed, spencer_lea permabanned.

We don't want this type of action around here. Find a new site to sit on and cuss out all day.
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2006 | 07:24 AM
  #65  
silvrhand's Avatar
silvrhand
Lost in Transit
Premier Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 10,003,830
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
Default

reopened thread, after double checking most of the stuff here is productive, the non productive person is still banned forever.
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2006 | 07:25 AM
  #66  
VO...'s Avatar
VO...
Administrator
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 58,609
Likes: 2,747
From: Down Under & Dirty
Default

spencer_lea = ownd
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2006 | 07:29 AM
  #67  
TheCajunStyle's Avatar
TheCajunStyle
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 532
Likes: 0
From: Berkshires
Default

Thanks silvrhand, please disregard my PM.

I think this thread took a turn for the better, not worse
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2006 | 07:31 AM
  #68  
silvrhand's Avatar
silvrhand
Lost in Transit
Premier Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 10,003,830
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
Default

No problem, sorry sometimes I'll close something just out of locking it down till I can get a chance to ban the user and refresh the thread and go from the beginning. This helps make sure that the thread doesn't get out of hand, sometimes it'll take me a bit.

- I lock the thread.
- I have to ban the user.
- I have to update our banned user list and reason so that everyone knows why.
- Usually have to PM the user, but in this case it's not even worth my time.
- Then I have to go over the thread again, and see if it needs to be unlocked.

Oh yah I'm at work too hehe
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2006 | 07:32 AM
  #69  
doug's Avatar
doug
New Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 16,838
Likes: 35
From: Apex, NC
Default

Originally Posted by taurran
It can be done... but isn't the ideal setup by any means. It will rob a lot of power and put more strain on the motor (heat wise).
i have stock cats and nismo exhaust... my EGT's are usually between 1000 - 1200
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2006 | 07:38 AM
  #70  
TheCajunStyle's Avatar
TheCajunStyle
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 532
Likes: 0
From: Berkshires
Default

Originally Posted by doug
i have stock cats and nismo exhaust... my EGT's are usually between 1000 - 1200
Those seem really low. I assume you're talking about normal cruising temps. There have been several other EGT threads--the average seemed to be 1400 at WOT.

Also taking cats off allows the turbos to spool faster. The only reason I see in keeping the cats (stored in a shed) are for emissions purposes.
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2006 | 07:39 AM
  #71  
doug's Avatar
doug
New Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 16,838
Likes: 35
From: Apex, NC
Default

Originally Posted by silvrhand

- Usually have to PM the user, but in this case it's not even worth my time.
Oh yah I'm at work too hehe
you don't have to pm them... if you use the reason box.. everytime they access the forum.. it tells them the reason they are banned..



If its a temp ban.. it will tell them the date and hour it will be lifted also

Reply
Old Jun 15, 2006 | 07:40 AM
  #72  
doug's Avatar
doug
New Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 16,838
Likes: 35
From: Apex, NC
Default

Originally Posted by TheCajunStyle
Those seem really low. I assume you're talking about normal cruising temps. There have been several other EGT threads--the average seemed to be 1400 at WOT.

Also taking cats off allows the turbos to spool faster. The only reason I see in keeping the cats (stored in a shed) are for emissions purposes.
oh yeah.. sorry 13xx - 1400 at WOT... i do alot of highway driving so i am hardly at WOT
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2006 | 07:41 AM
  #73  
BLACKZTOUR05's Avatar
BLACKZTOUR05
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
From: NC
Default

Man They Seem To Be Out Of Control
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2006 | 07:44 AM
  #74  
chimmike's Avatar
chimmike
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,254
Likes: 0
From: Bradenton/Sarasota
Default

Originally Posted by BLACKZTOUR05
Man They Seem To Be Out Of Control
welcome back spencer_lea.
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2006 | 07:58 AM
  #75  
Alberto's Avatar
Alberto
Cranky FI Owner
Premier Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 34,715
Likes: 8
From: DMV
Default

Originally Posted by chimmike
Alberto isn't especially an excellent driver with slicks/radials on an ST vs. me or Taurran or most other TN ST guys. I ran a 12.5 on street tires with 30psi pressure, and Taurran ran a 12.3 on the same tires but 19s vs my 18s and he was running 20psi of air pressure.
Your time and especially Tuarran's are good for street tires. Your falling under the misconception that if you were to get slicks youd be runnign next to me, maybe so, maybe not, thing is get some tires and then talk about what you run before you downplay my times. If its so easy to run 11's with TN and a drag tire why hasnt anybody done it? I believe Tuarran ran a low 1.9 60ft on his 12.3 run-excellent for a street tire. I ran 11's with a mid 1.8 60ft-barely better and not a HUGE advantage and ran .4 faster. I dont want to get into it with you or downplay your times and Tuarrans as I said they are top of the TN street times, I just think its funny you think .4 and .6 seconds down the 1/4 isnt a huge advantage. No worries by the time Tuarran gets some MT Street radials you'll have a lower number to chase
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2006 | 08:03 AM
  #76  
Alberto's Avatar
Alberto
Cranky FI Owner
Premier Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 34,715
Likes: 8
From: DMV
Default

k3silk-if you wanted to run a TN kit with a cat you can certianly do that, Id run without one because we can get by with our emissions system as I have before in the Z. Also yes I run a JWT clutch/fw combo I love it its not light enough to give me stupid wheelspin. With my 285's in warm weather I dead hook from a 1st gear roll.

Last edited by Alberto; Jun 15, 2006 at 08:06 AM.
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2006 | 10:41 AM
  #77  
k3silk's Avatar
k3silk
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,473
Likes: 0
From: MD
Default

i didnt know we could get by i had a turbo integra and i could never pass the sniffer with my turbo set up and it was a pain in the *** so i just wanted to pass the sniffer with a turbo set up.
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2006 | 11:42 AM
  #78  
superchargedg's Avatar
superchargedg
Damn Noobs
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 7,274
Likes: 2
From: timonium,md.
Default

Originally Posted by k3silk
i didnt know we could get by i had a turbo integra and i could never pass the sniffer with my turbo set up and it was a pain in the *** so i just wanted to pass the sniffer with a turbo set up.
hey bud whats up,glad to see your finally going fi.btw marylands emission,s test they just plug into the obd11 port to check for codes i think.
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2006 | 11:44 AM
  #79  
Alberto's Avatar
Alberto
Cranky FI Owner
Premier Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 34,715
Likes: 8
From: DMV
Default

We dont take sniffer tests, we do the OBDII test for 96 and newer cars. No CEL=Pass
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2006 | 01:16 PM
  #80  
SilverJDMCoupe's Avatar
SilverJDMCoupe
New Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 434
Likes: 0
From: Tennessee
Default

I have a question, is it worth it to just stick with the JWT and keep the boost at the 6.5psi and have it tuned conservative? Or just wait and build the motor up? The only reason I am now partial to the JWT is the two seperate intercoolers setup that they have for the G coupe. I remember there was a thread about how some motors "went" due to aggressive tunes, and high boost causing headlift (headlift leading to enabling fluid to enter the combustion chamber), but am I wrong in thinking that a conservative tune coupled with 6.5psi (along with correct maintainence) is a safe way to go with very little to worry about?
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:34 PM.