Forged Performance...A+ once again...481rwhp @ 9psi
Hi everyone. MP...glad you are happy with the tune. Unfortunately, my test drive of your car was cut short, as that police officer idling in the adjacent lot put a quick end to the open-dump-tube madness. It did sound sweet! 
8psi on the eManage pressure sensor, and 9psi on the dyno pressure sensor. Trq checked in at about 435 at the peak, and then leveled out to about 415 and held very stable all the way to redline.
MP is running a full 3 inch exhuast, with dump tubes, so its not uncommon to trade a little bit of trq, for some serious top-end gains. With a more restrictive exhaust, and a slightly different tuning strategy, you can trade back some of that whp for trq. VQ35's that produce signifcantly more trq than whp, are usually suffering from excessive exhaust back pressure, too little ignition timing, or an undersized turbocharger for the boost pressure utilized. With full trq occuring at 4000rpm and very flat trq curve to redline, this car is a blast to drive, and delivers some very usable power without needlessly roasting the tires.....except in 1st and parts of 2nd.
I think your car is ready for round II at Rockingham, MP.
Here is the full dyno chart, with trq, in case anyone was interested.

8psi on the eManage pressure sensor, and 9psi on the dyno pressure sensor. Trq checked in at about 435 at the peak, and then leveled out to about 415 and held very stable all the way to redline.
MP is running a full 3 inch exhuast, with dump tubes, so its not uncommon to trade a little bit of trq, for some serious top-end gains. With a more restrictive exhaust, and a slightly different tuning strategy, you can trade back some of that whp for trq. VQ35's that produce signifcantly more trq than whp, are usually suffering from excessive exhaust back pressure, too little ignition timing, or an undersized turbocharger for the boost pressure utilized. With full trq occuring at 4000rpm and very flat trq curve to redline, this car is a blast to drive, and delivers some very usable power without needlessly roasting the tires.....except in 1st and parts of 2nd.

I think your car is ready for round II at Rockingham, MP.

Here is the full dyno chart, with trq, in case anyone was interested.
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,311
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh, NC
Sharif, thanks for the explanation and dyno chart (only got a pic of the other one). Yes, Rockingham soon would be nice (though i'm not much of a drag racer and I will still be on street tires), I just need to get them axles first.
I love the way the car drives. It already gets very little traction with 295's in 1st and when you hit 2nd, so more torque down low isn't necessary and I enjoy the topend pull trade-off
I love the way the car drives. It already gets very little traction with 295's in 1st and when you hit 2nd, so more torque down low isn't necessary and I enjoy the topend pull trade-off
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 7,175
Likes: 132
From: Florida
Awesome numbers. Now that Sharif is closer, it would be awesome to check out the shop. I am so glad the Z community has a bunch of excellent tuners and workmanship. Thanks to you guys.
My only question is to fellow forum-ers about the dyno pulls. Why not bash the pulls done here just like the pulls done in this thread?? https://my350z.com/forum/showthread.php?t=204239
Same place right?? Please don't bash me I am just putting a point out there. (runs and ducks for cover)
My only question is to fellow forum-ers about the dyno pulls. Why not bash the pulls done here just like the pulls done in this thread?? https://my350z.com/forum/showthread.php?t=204239
Same place right?? Please don't bash me I am just putting a point out there. (runs and ducks for cover)
Originally Posted by NA&CH
Awesome numbers. Now that Sharif is closer, it would be awesome to check out the shop. I am so glad the Z community has a bunch of excellent tuners and workmanship. Thanks to you guys.
My only question is to fellow forum-ers about the dyno pulls. Why not bash the pulls done here just like the pulls done in this thread?? https://my350z.com/forum/showthread.php?t=204239
Same place right?? Please don't bash me I am just putting a point out there. (runs and ducks for cover)
My only question is to fellow forum-ers about the dyno pulls. Why not bash the pulls done here just like the pulls done in this thread?? https://my350z.com/forum/showthread.php?t=204239
Same place right?? Please don't bash me I am just putting a point out there. (runs and ducks for cover)
Don't worry, you arent stirring up anything. We will no longer use any additional correction on our dyno. From now on, the DD numbers will be pure DD numbers, with just the standard atmospheric correction that is applied to all dynos.Posted on the other thread:
Hi everyone, the first thing suprised me about Keith's engine, was the perfect smoothless and flat trq curve with the factory ECU. I have never seen such a perfect power and trq curve out of the factory ECU. Repeated passes were identical. I'd call that unusual (in a good way) for a factory ECU tune.
Second, Dyno Dynamics claims their dynos read 13% lower than a DynoJet. We add only 11% to the numbers to simulate a DJ number, so the numbers should be close to a dynojet.
Lastly, there is so much heated debate on dyno numbers, that we are inclined to remove all additional correction, and let the customer/seat of the pants speak for itself. The dyno debate consumes way too much of everyone's time. As Alberto mentioned, a dyno is a tuning and measurement tool. Consistency, is the name of the game. To me, the numbers mean very little.
Hats off to Nissan though.....this is an absolutely perfect factory ECU tune.
Once final comment in regards to MP's dyno. 435-415ft/lbs of trq is perfectly normal...I dont think anyone would debate that number is excessively high. Dyno's measure trq, not whp....so I dont see anything unusuall with these numbers.
Last edited by Sharif@Forged; Jul 18, 2006 at 06:31 AM.
Originally Posted by NA&CH
Awesome numbers. Now that Sharif is closer, it would be awesome to check out the shop. I am so glad the Z community has a bunch of excellent tuners and workmanship. Thanks to you guys.
My only question is to fellow forum-ers about the dyno pulls. Why not bash the pulls done here just like the pulls done in this thread?? https://my350z.com/forum/showthread.php?t=204239
Same place right?? Please don't bash me I am just putting a point out there. (runs and ducks for cover)
My only question is to fellow forum-ers about the dyno pulls. Why not bash the pulls done here just like the pulls done in this thread?? https://my350z.com/forum/showthread.php?t=204239
Same place right?? Please don't bash me I am just putting a point out there. (runs and ducks for cover)
EDIT-just read Sharif's post, thanks Sharif for not using the "correction" anymore
Last edited by Alberto; Jul 18, 2006 at 06:36 AM.
You are right, Alberto. The LAST thing I want is for someone to even FEEL they are getting a higher number that they are actually making. And to avoid any chance of that happening, since we are basically guessing at the dynojet numbers.....there will be no more correction applied on my dyno....period.
Just prior to MP's car, we had a TN car come in from a UTEC retune. Baseline number was 353whp, and post tune number was 403whp. To say he was pleased, and that his car was transformed, is an understatement.
Just prior to MP's car, we had a TN car come in from a UTEC retune. Baseline number was 353whp, and post tune number was 403whp. To say he was pleased, and that his car was transformed, is an understatement.
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,311
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh, NC
I knew about the 11% before putting it on the dyno, and knew about the correction last time at CP. The thing that amazed me most is that I put down 424rwhp on CP's corrected dyno before (which would be roughly 375rwhp uncorrected) and now my uncorrected DD numbers would be 434rwhp. So granted...its alot fast and alot better. I just hope dynojet gets phased out eventually and DD takes over. Its so much better for tuning.
Originally Posted by 002-M-P
So granted...its alot fast and alot better. I just hope dynojet gets phased out eventually and DD takes over. Its so much better for tuning.
I agree everyone has an assumption of the percentages between different dynos, we gave up on that and just worry about the tune, as long as the dyno shows a difference between first and last run and specially if the customer comes back after a spin around the block with a big smile the job is done. We tell them that if they want bragging numbers to show their buddies, to take it to a dynojet preferrably one they have used in the past.
I don't disagree that the dyno is a tuning machine and used to measure between a baseline and later after mods, tuning, etc. But without some relationship to a stock model with the numbers, it really only will show that some improvement over the way the car came in - which in reality, could be well below a stock car,as in mods, previous tune, lack of maint, etc, could cause a loss of hp. So to help me better understand these numbers from the DD, what does a bone stock 287 hp Z do for peak hp and tq on this machine? Have you run a bone stock revup and non revup on this dyno yet? Those numbers and charts would at least give a baseline of some kind to judge against, for me, anyway.
I agree that these numbers as in bragging rights are pure hoohey. I have seen the gross differences between dynos in my own limited experience to know that. But knowing what a base model puts down on the same machine would be quite useful in my opinion. When I dynoed in Cincinatti they had dyno sheets on the wall from base models of the Z etc to compare to, that had been run on that machine. While not perfect, it gives some basis.
I agree that these numbers as in bragging rights are pure hoohey. I have seen the gross differences between dynos in my own limited experience to know that. But knowing what a base model puts down on the same machine would be quite useful in my opinion. When I dynoed in Cincinatti they had dyno sheets on the wall from base models of the Z etc to compare to, that had been run on that machine. While not perfect, it gives some basis.
Last edited by gringott; Jul 18, 2006 at 07:33 AM.
Originally Posted by westpak
Well not to start a dyno discussion on this thread but that wont help you either, we have seen bone stock Z's dyno up to 20 hp apart
I'll get a stock VQ35 (probably an auto..since I have access to two of them right now), and that will at least give everyone an idea of a bone stock auto Z on our dyno...no correction. I'll try to get it posted later today.
Originally Posted by Sharif@Forged
Posted on the other thread:
Hi everyone, the first thing suprised me about Keith's engine, was the perfect smoothless and flat trq curve with the factory ECU. I have never seen such a perfect power and trq curve out of the factory ECU. Repeated passes were identical. I'd call that unusual (in a good way) for a factory ECU tune.
Second, Dyno Dynamics claims their dynos read 13% lower than a DynoJet. We add only 11% to the numbers to simulate a DJ number, so the numbers should be close to a dynojet.
Lastly, there is so much heated debate on dyno numbers, that we are inclined to remove all additional correction, and let the customer/seat of the pants speak for itself. The dyno debate consumes way too much of everyone's time. As Alberto mentioned, a dyno is a tuning and measurement tool. Consistency, is the name of the game. To me, the numbers mean very little.
Hi everyone, the first thing suprised me about Keith's engine, was the perfect smoothless and flat trq curve with the factory ECU. I have never seen such a perfect power and trq curve out of the factory ECU. Repeated passes were identical. I'd call that unusual (in a good way) for a factory ECU tune.
Second, Dyno Dynamics claims their dynos read 13% lower than a DynoJet. We add only 11% to the numbers to simulate a DJ number, so the numbers should be close to a dynojet.
Lastly, there is so much heated debate on dyno numbers, that we are inclined to remove all additional correction, and let the customer/seat of the pants speak for itself. The dyno debate consumes way too much of everyone's time. As Alberto mentioned, a dyno is a tuning and measurement tool. Consistency, is the name of the game. To me, the numbers mean very little.
When I come up on Friday I'll take two dyno print outs.....Uncorrected and corrrected with an 11% add on. When I get back to Miami I'll hit a local dyno jet. Unlike the countless of times others have said they would do this, I promise to do so and will post up the results.
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,311
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh, NC
Originally Posted by Gman2004
Hey Shariff,
When I come up on Friday I'll take two dyno print outs.....Uncorrected and corrrected with an 11% add on. When I get back to Miami I'll hit a local dyno jet. Unlike the countless of times others have said they would do this, I promise to do so and will post up the results.
When I come up on Friday I'll take two dyno print outs.....Uncorrected and corrrected with an 11% add on. When I get back to Miami I'll hit a local dyno jet. Unlike the countless of times others have said they would do this, I promise to do so and will post up the results.





