Forged Performance...A+ once again...481rwhp @ 9psi
#41
Originally Posted by Gman2004
Hey Shariff,
When I come up on Friday I'll take two dyno print outs.....Uncorrected and corrrected with an 11% add on. When I get back to Miami I'll hit a local dyno jet. Unlike the countless of times others have said they would do this, I promise to do so and will post up the results.
When I come up on Friday I'll take two dyno print outs.....Uncorrected and corrrected with an 11% add on. When I get back to Miami I'll hit a local dyno jet. Unlike the countless of times others have said they would do this, I promise to do so and will post up the results.
#42
Originally Posted by Sharif@Forged
Sounds like a great idea. Regardless of the results, we'll commit to standard numbers, as I feel like we are giving DJ credit, for trying to emulate their numbers...LOL.
#43
Hi everyone,
We just finished dyno testing an 04 G35 coupe 5AT. Modifications are a JWT pop charger and Stillen full exhaust.
The graph posted is a pure DynoDynamics number, using standard atmospheric correction. No additional correction was added.
I just wanted to post this for reference...not really sure what a typical auto G35 5AT puts down on a DynoJet.
As mentionded, moving forward, we will not add additional correction to our system.
We just finished dyno testing an 04 G35 coupe 5AT. Modifications are a JWT pop charger and Stillen full exhaust.
The graph posted is a pure DynoDynamics number, using standard atmospheric correction. No additional correction was added.
I just wanted to post this for reference...not really sure what a typical auto G35 5AT puts down on a DynoJet.
As mentionded, moving forward, we will not add additional correction to our system.
#45
Originally Posted by Sharif@Forged
Hi everyone,
We just finished dyno testing an 04 G35 coupe 5AT. Modifications are a JWT pop charger and Stillen full exhaust.
The graph posted is a pure DynoDynamics number, using standard atmospheric correction. No additional correction was added.
I just wanted to post this for reference...not really sure what a typical auto G35 5AT puts down on a DynoJet.
As mentionded, moving forward, we will not add additional correction to our system.
We just finished dyno testing an 04 G35 coupe 5AT. Modifications are a JWT pop charger and Stillen full exhaust.
The graph posted is a pure DynoDynamics number, using standard atmospheric correction. No additional correction was added.
I just wanted to post this for reference...not really sure what a typical auto G35 5AT puts down on a DynoJet.
As mentionded, moving forward, we will not add additional correction to our system.
Looks like Brittney needs to some BOOST
#47
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,311
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh, NC
Originally Posted by Bullitproof
So what you guys are saying is that if i added 11% to my dynapack numberfor a dynojet adjustment, i'm putting out 480whp with an APS ST? Wowsers!!!!!!
#50
Originally Posted by Peking
Looks like Brittney needs to some BOOST
#51
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,311
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh, NC
Originally Posted by gringott
That looks like a good baseline, about what I would expect for that car.
#52
Originally Posted by 002-M-P
no, dynapack numbers actually tend to read high compared to dynojet while dyno dynamics and mustangdyne tend to read lower than dynojet.
#53
Originally Posted by 002-M-P
I would have thought it would put down a good bit more considering the intake and full exhaust, not sure how much more drivetrain loss an AT has??
The auto trans tend to be about 10-15whp less than the 6MT
#54
Originally Posted by Sharif@Forged
Yup....she is tempted. I have a TN tuner kit sitting in the inventory cage that she has been spying.
Oh and please check your PM's
Jonathan
#55
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,311
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh, NC
Originally Posted by Sharif@Forged
The owner had mentioned she put down 222whp on a DynoJet, without the exhaust system...if that helps.
The auto trans tend to be about 10-15whp less than the 6MT
The auto trans tend to be about 10-15whp less than the 6MT
Originally Posted by Peking
Sweet, and that would be hot... I might have to tell her if she gets boosted I will wash her car in a thong bikini
you in a thong bikini=probably not nearly as great, lol
#56
Originally Posted by 002-M-P
Her getting boosted=great
you in a thong bikini=probably not nearly as great, lol
you in a thong bikini=probably not nearly as great, lol
But yeah your right it won't be as great lol.
Jonathan
#57
Here is a video of the run, but the quality is not great for some reason, and the sound doesn't come close to giving the car justice.'
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l3uzgpyQg2A
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l3uzgpyQg2A
#58
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,311
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh, NC
craig, thanks for posting that. I just got my 2 videos on my computer and will upload them to my website to download this afternoon (probably right about 5pm est). They are better quality, but still do not represent the car very well at all.
#59
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,311
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh, NC
Ok as promised here are 2 vids of my car....
http://mp-racing.net/481dynorun1.avi (Right-Click and Save As) 11MB
http://mp-racing.net/481dynorun2.avi (Right-Click and Save As) 19MB
http://mp-racing.net/481dynorun1.avi (Right-Click and Save As) 11MB
http://mp-racing.net/481dynorun2.avi (Right-Click and Save As) 19MB
#60
Nice runs! Man that 3" SVRTech exhaust is loud. Not to hijack this thread but Sharif since you've been tuning so much now, you've probably heard all the 3" exhausts out there (SVRTech/APS/AAM/SFR), which seems to be the quietest in your opinion?