Notices
Forced Induction Turbochargers and Superchargers..Got Boost?

C6 Corvette

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 21, 2006 | 03:19 PM
  #21  
sentry65's Avatar
sentry65
the burninator
Premier Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 9,722
Likes: 2
From: phoenix, AZ
Default

yeah but the gearing is a bit weaker

the Z's 5th gear ends at roughly 148mph which is roughly where the C6's 4th gear ends (152mph)

so if you add up the first 4 gear ratios of the C6, multiply by the final drive and divide by 4 gears you get 6.387

if you do the same with the Z and divide by 5 gears you get 7.083

so the Z's gearing up to roughly 150mph is 10.9% stronger - is that 10.9% advantage worth the extra shift? IMO yes it is at higher speeds

it gets trickier when trying to specifically calculate 40-140mph, but it can be done. I still think you'll be seeing roughly a 10-12% stronger gearing for the Z though

The C6 won't hit 195mph. The Z06 will hit 198mph though, maybe that's what you're thinking of.

Besides, the race isn't going to 186mph (C6's top speed)

Last edited by sentry65; Jul 21, 2006 at 03:23 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2006 | 03:23 PM
  #22  
priscilla ls1's Avatar
priscilla ls1
New Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 709
Likes: 0
From: Leesburg, VA
Default

So do you think the race will end at 150mph+? I dont think so. Once the Z shift into 5th the vette will be gone the race will be over. thats why He needs to end the race quick before the fifth shift.
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2006 | 03:24 PM
  #23  
priscilla ls1's Avatar
priscilla ls1
New Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 709
Likes: 0
From: Leesburg, VA
Default

Originally Posted by sentry65

The C6 won't hit 195mph. The Z06 will hit 198mph though, maybe that's what you're thinking of.

Besides, the race isn't going to 186mph (C6's top speed)
My bad.
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2006 | 03:26 PM
  #24  
sentry65's Avatar
sentry65
the burninator
Premier Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 9,722
Likes: 2
From: phoenix, AZ
Default

i totally disagree

at 5th gear, he'll be going 117mph at 5200rpms with a multiplied gear ratio of 3.537 (3.537 x 1.00)

the vette will be at 5000 rpms in 4th gear which multiplies to be 3.42 (3.42 x 1.00)

so even in 5th gear, the Z will have a 3.4% gearing advantage

then there's the power difference...which on the top end with the TN kit, the Z has the clear advantage

the only advantage the vette will have at 117mph is the .28 drag coeficient vs the Z's .29 or .3 (not sure if he has the aero package) and a little less weight which by 117mph isn't as important

Last edited by sentry65; Jul 21, 2006 at 03:30 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2006 | 03:30 PM
  #25  
Gators2001's Avatar
Gators2001
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,298
Likes: 1
From: Miami, FL
Default

this is paper stuff...

doesnt apply well to street racing.
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2006 | 03:32 PM
  #26  
juicedZ's Avatar
juicedZ
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 158
Likes: 1
From: new jersey
Default

i just looked on some websites and it says that the weight of the 06 C6 vette z51 package is 3200lbs? i thought the Z only weighed about 3300lbs? so where are you getting this 400lb diff. from?
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2006 | 03:32 PM
  #27  
sentry65's Avatar
sentry65
the burninator
Premier Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 9,722
Likes: 2
From: phoenix, AZ
Default

Originally Posted by Gators2001
this is paper stuff...

doesnt apply well to street racing.
yeah car engineering factors should have absolutely no effect on racing whatsoever

in that case, I say the giant fuzzy pink bunny will win

Originally Posted by juicedZ
i just looked on some websites and it says that the weight of the 06 C6 vette z51 package is 3200lbs? i thought the Z only weighed about 3300lbs? so where are you getting this 400lb diff. from?
+1.
his Z has a tilton that's 30 lbs less
no spare tire/tools, that's 30 lbs less
added the TN kit, that's 80 lbs
test pipes, that's 25 lbs less
exhaust cut out - who knows how much less that is (20 lbs?)
I forget how much the touring model weighs, but it isn't over 3400 lbs

Last edited by sentry65; Jul 21, 2006 at 03:35 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2006 | 03:35 PM
  #28  
priscilla ls1's Avatar
priscilla ls1
New Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 709
Likes: 0
From: Leesburg, VA
Default

Originally Posted by sentry65

the only advantage the vette will have at 117mph is the .28 drag coeficient vs the Z's .29 or .3 (not sure if he has the aero package) and a little less weight which by 117mph isn't as important
Drag is a big factor when going at speed of 90+mph.


Originally Posted by juicedZ
i just looked on some websites and it says that the weight of the 06 C6 vette z51 package is 3200lbs? i thought the Z only weighed about 3300lbs? so where are you getting this 400lb diff. from?

3300lb is the stock base model or you might be looking at the track version. touring is around 200lb heavier then the base models. Dont even metion the Z51 package if you are racing from a roll, it dont matter.
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2006 | 03:37 PM
  #29  
Gators2001's Avatar
Gators2001
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,298
Likes: 1
From: Miami, FL
Default

Originally Posted by sentry65
yeah car engineering factors should have absolutely no effect on racing whatsoever

in that case, I say the giant fuzzy pink bunny will win

LOL, sure didnt think u would be offended.

Just b/c on paper someone is suppose to win does NOT mean they will.

I doubt the friend is going to show up w/out doing something to the car, whether it be installing some Bullets, Intake, or something.

Everyone has to earn their win. mis-shifts or tons of other things can go wrong.


PS: just so you dont get made BULLETS are a type of exhuast made by B&B that they rave about.
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2006 | 03:38 PM
  #30  
sentry65's Avatar
sentry65
the burninator
Premier Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 9,722
Likes: 2
From: phoenix, AZ
Default

Originally Posted by priscilla ls1
Drag is a big factor when going at speed of 90+mph.
of course it is, but because the race is only going to 140mph, I don't think it'll overcome 50whp and 3.4% stronger gearing from 117mph and up, even if the Z is roughly 175 lbs heavier

keep in mind the C6 has wider diameter tires in the rear - they're not only 19's, but with a 35mm profile, the weight is thrown way out to the edge
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2006 | 03:39 PM
  #31  
priscilla ls1's Avatar
priscilla ls1
New Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 709
Likes: 0
From: Leesburg, VA
Default

Originally Posted by sentry65



+1.
his Z has a tilton that's 30 lbs less
no spare tire/tools, that's 30 lbs less
added the TN kit, that's 80 lbs
test pipes, that's 25 lbs less
exhaust cut out - who knows how much less that is (20 lbs?)
I forget how much the touring model weighs, but it isn't over 3400 lbs
A cutout actualy adds like 4lb's so on average with these mods he gained 9 lb.
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2006 | 03:43 PM
  #32  
sentry65's Avatar
sentry65
the burninator
Premier Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 9,722
Likes: 2
From: phoenix, AZ
Default

oh ok didn't know that about the cutaway

the tilton does more than just trim dead weight though - it's rotational mass which is much more valueable than dead weight, AND it makes shifts quicker
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2006 | 03:45 PM
  #33  
priscilla ls1's Avatar
priscilla ls1
New Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 709
Likes: 0
From: Leesburg, VA
Default

Originally Posted by sentry65
oh ok didn't know that about the cutaway

the tilton does more than just trim dead weight though - it's rotational mass which is much more valueable than dead weight, AND it makes shifts quicker

yayaya mass off the crank. Look I think it will be close from a roll but forget about from a dig or from a 1/4. Not saying that you will win I dont want to put my foot in my mouth, just want to say it will be close.
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2006 | 03:55 PM
  #34  
sentry65's Avatar
sentry65
the burninator
Premier Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 9,722
Likes: 2
From: phoenix, AZ
Default

it would indeed be a much closer race from a dig. I think I'd actually favor the C6 from a dig. It's weight distribution and much wider rear tires (not to mention stickier tires) and a lot more low end torque, mean it will launch sooooo much better than a TN Z with stock tires - and it won't have to shift gears quite so soon before you even get 10% down the 1/4 mile

though of course a good driver makes all the difference when launching

Last edited by sentry65; Jul 21, 2006 at 03:58 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2006 | 06:43 PM
  #35  
Bullitproof's Avatar
Bullitproof
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 961
Likes: 0
From: Wilmington De
Default

Originally Posted by 20"makavelli
i know that before i took my car to put it to 8lbs of boost i had 4lbs of boost on the aps TT pushing 386 whp and i beat a new c6 by about 3 car lengths
First rule of boost club:

If you can't back up such an outrageous claim, don't post that b.s. number. Makes you look like an idiot that you would believe anything your mechanic tells you. I told you the same thing on the other forum. Big brother is watching.
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2006 | 07:07 PM
  #36  
juicedZ's Avatar
juicedZ
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 158
Likes: 1
From: new jersey
Default

what b.s number? Your not talking to me are you?
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2006 | 07:08 PM
  #37  
NISMOFO's Avatar
NISMOFO
Registered User
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,566
Likes: 0
From: McKinney, TX
Default

I had a staged race against a C6 Coupe (I asked him at the stop light). The only thing is that I don't know if it was 6spd, auto or paddles?

I have APS TT with 9.5lbs of boost doing 385rwhp on dynodynamics dynometer.....so you can estimate on your own what it would on a dynojet.

Anyways, the race was from a 40mph roll. I decided on 3rd gear because I didn't want to shift immediately out of 2nd. So from a 40 - 80 mph run I pulled away from him just fine....by 80mph I had "about" a 1 car length gap between my rear bumper and his front bumper....could be more or less.....I'm not sure.
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2006 | 07:11 PM
  #38  
priscilla ls1's Avatar
priscilla ls1
New Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 709
Likes: 0
From: Leesburg, VA
Default

Originally Posted by 350Track
I had a staged race against a C6 Coupe (I asked him at the stop light). The only thing is that I don't know if it was 6spd, auto or paddles?

I have APS TT with 9.5lbs of boost doing 385rwhp on dynodynamics dynometer.....so you can estimate on your own what it would on a dynojet.

Anyways, the race was from a 40mph roll. I decided on 3rd gear because I didn't want to shift immediately out of 2nd. So from a 40 - 80 mph run I pulled away from him just fine....by 80mph I had "about" a 1 car length gap between my rear bumper and his front bumper....could be more or less.....I'm not sure.
I assume you are in a track model not a touring.
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2006 | 07:14 PM
  #39  
juicedZ's Avatar
juicedZ
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 158
Likes: 1
From: new jersey
Default

350Track, do you know if the vette was stock, or did it have anything done?
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2006 | 07:20 PM
  #40  
sentry65's Avatar
sentry65
the burninator
Premier Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 9,722
Likes: 2
From: phoenix, AZ
Default

Originally Posted by 350Track
I had a staged race against a C6 Coupe (I asked him at the stop light). The only thing is that I don't know if it was 6spd, auto or paddles?

I have APS TT with 9.5lbs of boost doing 385rwhp on dynodynamics dynometer.....so you can estimate on your own what it would on a dynojet.

Anyways, the race was from a 40mph roll. I decided on 3rd gear because I didn't want to shift immediately out of 2nd. So from a 40 - 80 mph run I pulled away from him just fine....by 80mph I had "about" a 1 car length gap between my rear bumper and his front bumper....could be more or less.....I'm not sure.
so you started that race at 2900 rpms in a gear that's 43% weaker than 2nd gear instead of at 4100rpms in 2nd? Now I understand why the low end torque is so important to guys with turbos, but that's still impressive that you won Just think how much you would have won if you raced in a normal gear
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:49 PM.