Notices
Forced Induction Turbochargers and Superchargers..Got Boost?

Overboost cut on T-netics

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 5, 2006 | 07:37 AM
  #1  
g356gear's Avatar
g356gear
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,222
Likes: 0
From: Man in the Sun
Default Overboost cut on T-netics

I was riding with a buddy Sat night in his G35 with the T-netics stage 1 kit. The car went into limp mode twice. The car has the stock reflash with the UTEC installed but not tuned yet...only zero values. UTEC clamps at 4.7 volts but we were still hitting limp mode. "overboost cut" has been mentioned by some forum members. I have not seen this before. Anyone care to fill me in??
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2006 | 07:48 AM
  #2  
chimmike's Avatar
chimmike
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,254
Likes: 0
From: Bradenton/Sarasota
Default

if the utec is installed but not tuned, it should be set to map "0" which lets the ecu fully control the car, and that shouldn't be happening.
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2006 | 08:02 AM
  #3  
MIAPLAYA's Avatar
MIAPLAYA
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 11,373
Likes: 0
From: Escondido
Default

How much boost is he seeing at the manifold?
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2006 | 11:37 AM
  #4  
GurgenPB's Avatar
GurgenPB
UltimateSleeper
Premier Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,211
Likes: 1
From: Los Angeles, CA
Default

It's going into limp mode because both the short and the long term fuel trims are maxing out. This is the reason. I have had that issue, before scaling hte injectors properly. I don't know quite how to do it on the utec yet.
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2006 | 07:09 AM
  #5  
g356gear's Avatar
g356gear
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,222
Likes: 0
From: Man in the Sun
Default

Originally Posted by MIAPLAYA
How much boost is he seeing at the manifold?
8-9 lbs on the gauge off the manifold. Temp was around 65 degrees at the time.
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2006 | 07:10 AM
  #6  
MIAPLAYA's Avatar
MIAPLAYA
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 11,373
Likes: 0
From: Escondido
Default

Originally Posted by g356gear
8-9 lbs on the gauge off the manifold. Temp was around 65 degrees at the time.
Hmm, no boost leaks anywhere?
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2006 | 07:10 AM
  #7  
g356gear's Avatar
g356gear
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,222
Likes: 0
From: Man in the Sun
Default

Originally Posted by chimmike
if the utec is installed but not tuned, it should be set to map "0" which lets the ecu fully control the car, and that shouldn't be happening.
That's the situation. All values on the UTEC are set at zero and the car is essentially running off the flash. The clamp on the MAF voltage on the UTEC is 4.7 volts. This is why I think this is so strange.
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2006 | 07:11 AM
  #8  
g356gear's Avatar
g356gear
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,222
Likes: 0
From: Man in the Sun
Default

Originally Posted by MIAPLAYA
Hmm, no boost leaks anywhere?

Everything is tight. Holds boost perfectly. It just hits the wall around 4000-5000 rpm and it's game over until the car is shut off for a couple of minutes. Earlier in the night it was fine....then did it twice in 20 minutes.
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2006 | 07:14 AM
  #9  
g356gear's Avatar
g356gear
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,222
Likes: 0
From: Man in the Sun
Default

Originally Posted by GurgenPB
It's going into limp mode because both the short and the long term fuel trims are maxing out. This is the reason. I have had that issue, before scaling hte injectors properly. I don't know quite how to do it on the utec yet.
I haven't heard of this on the stock reflashed ecu's before. Anyone else seen it??
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2006 | 07:28 AM
  #10  
josh846's Avatar
josh846
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
From: Ft. Worth, tx
Default

It is your MAF. The stock mass air flow sensor can not handle the heat. It is a bad design on Turbonetics part. The hot air is going right past the sensor and it will cause that. It happend on my car and after about 3 days of talking to people I figured out exactly what it is. The MAF are expensive around 350 if i remember correctly. I had it installed and fixed from a local place called uprev in Austin, TX. After getting the new one in I have had no problems, but they said it will only be a matter of time because the hot air is what is killing it so it will work for a while but then i will have to replace it again. They are going to design something up so I will not have to use the factory MAF.
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2006 | 07:36 AM
  #11  
chimmike's Avatar
chimmike
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,254
Likes: 0
From: Bradenton/Sarasota
Default

the design of the TN has nothing to do with the MAF going bad


I've been driving hard in FL heat and humidity for 12k miles, and my car runs just as good as the first day I installed the kit.

It's not the MAF. He's got something set in the UTEC that shouldn't be. If he's set on map "0", the settings in the other maps have absolutely no bearing on how the car runs.....so he must not have it set on map "0".
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2006 | 08:29 AM
  #12  
josh846's Avatar
josh846
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
From: Ft. Worth, tx
Default

Actually yes, I would bet it is the MAF, I had the EXACT same problem about a month ago. Replaced JUST the MAF, NO problems at all. So tell me where any tuning made a difference with my car going into limp mode. If someone is using a UTEC and still has the MAF sensor in use then eventually they will have the problem. Mine happened at around 35k miles another friend, solidsnake, which has the TN kit as well, had this happen to his car. Two options, get a new MAF sensor it will work fine for a while, but this will eventually happen again, or find a way to not use the MAF. I would suggest setting up the Map sensor for the UTEC.
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2006 | 08:33 AM
  #13  
chimmike's Avatar
chimmike
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,254
Likes: 0
From: Bradenton/Sarasota
Default

I'm still thinking the UTEC is set on a map number and it's cutting injectors or ignition or causing a maf issue, i don't think his MAF is bad.
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2006 | 08:45 AM
  #14  
MIAPLAYA's Avatar
MIAPLAYA
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 11,373
Likes: 0
From: Escondido
Default

Originally Posted by josh846
Actually yes, I would bet it is the MAF, I had the EXACT same problem about a month ago. Replaced JUST the MAF, NO problems at all. So tell me where any tuning made a difference with my car going into limp mode. If someone is using a UTEC and still has the MAF sensor in use then eventually they will have the problem. Mine happened at around 35k miles another friend, solidsnake, which has the TN kit as well, had this happen to his car. Two options, get a new MAF sensor it will work fine for a while, but this will eventually happen again, or find a way to not use the MAF. I would suggest setting up the Map sensor for the UTEC.
And you don't think its possible the MAF was damaged during install. I have 35k+ miles on my kit and have (a)never had this happen and (b) still running the stock MAF. I have no heat wrap on any of my piping and anyone who lives in Socal will confirm its been 100 degrees or higher lately. BTW those 35k+ miles include trips to the track, full boost pulls in 105F weather at BOTI last year, etc.
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2006 | 09:51 AM
  #15  
josh846's Avatar
josh846
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
From: Ft. Worth, tx
Default

G356gear post what fixes it after he gets it fixed. I know we talked on the phone a little while earlier about the issue. Everyone wants to say it isn't the MAF, but I know I had the exact same problems and that is all it took to fix it, no problems since fix.

MIA do you actually still use the MAF? or do you have a MAP sensor for the UTEC or something similar. If you have a MAP sensor or are using something other than the MAF then that is why you do not notice there is a problem.

Why is it so hard to believe that The Turbo forcing all the air past the MAF could cause this problem?
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2006 | 10:13 AM
  #16  
MIAPLAYA's Avatar
MIAPLAYA
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 11,373
Likes: 0
From: Escondido
Default

Originally Posted by josh846
G356gear post what fixes it after he gets it fixed. I know we talked on the phone a little while earlier about the issue. Everyone wants to say it isn't the MAF, but I know I had the exact same problems and that is all it took to fix it, no problems since fix.

MIA do you actually still use the MAF? or do you have a MAP sensor for the UTEC or something similar. If you have a MAP sensor or are using something other than the MAF then that is why you do not notice there is a problem.

Why is it so hard to believe that The Turbo forcing all the air past the MAF could cause this problem?
I don't doubt the MAf may have gone bad or may be going bad. And I don't have a UTEC. I have been running the out of box Stage 1 kit with the relfash, original MAF, in fact original everything except clutch for 35k+ miles.
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2006 | 10:15 AM
  #17  
chimmike's Avatar
chimmike
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,254
Likes: 0
From: Bradenton/Sarasota
Default

Originally Posted by josh846

Why is it so hard to believe that The Turbo forcing all the air past the MAF could cause this problem?

because it would have happened a LOT sooner. MAF's are much, MUCH more sensitive than you think
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2006 | 10:18 AM
  #18  
MIAPLAYA's Avatar
MIAPLAYA
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 11,373
Likes: 0
From: Escondido
Default

One thing I haven't seen mentioned is the voltage clamp setting. If you clamp it lower what happens? Sounds like the MAF is going over voltage and may not actually be bad...
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2006 | 02:31 PM
  #19  
g356gear's Avatar
g356gear
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,222
Likes: 0
From: Man in the Sun
Default

Originally Posted by chimmike
because it would have happened a LOT sooner. MAF's are much, MUCH more sensitive than you think
These 3 cases seemed to happen within 1000-2000 miles of the turbo install.
MAF was fine prior to that. If they were damaged during the turbo install I would have expected to see failure right away.
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2006 | 02:33 PM
  #20  
g356gear's Avatar
g356gear
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,222
Likes: 0
From: Man in the Sun
Default

Originally Posted by MIAPLAYA
One thing I haven't seen mentioned is the voltage clamp setting. If you clamp it lower what happens? Sounds like the MAF is going over voltage and may not actually be bad...
I don't think it would be a good idea to clamp much lower than the max MAF voltage for the ecu. I would expect problems with the fuel tables on the re-flash if you clamped it lower....at say 4 volts. I understand anyway that the UTEC does not allow changing of the MAF clamp voltage by the end user. This would require a reprogramming of the UTEC at the manufacturer level.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:29 PM.