Function:TUNED – 563.7 DynoDynamics (REAL) RWHP - STOCK MOTOR!
05-01-2007, 06:35 PM
#41
New Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Get out my way pimpin, VA
Posts: 22,909
Received 2,446 Likes
on
1,768 Posts
Originally Posted by DaveFunction2ND
Many people can also attest to the fact that Nowell is not “Easy” on his car.
Holy ****ing **** Nowell... next vid we get may very likely be the exact opposite of what happened last time. Way to sacrifice the engine for the (350Z) team.
Awesome job Function:TUNED.
05-01-2007, 06:53 PM
#42
Originally Posted by DaveFunction2ND
I doubt it. If you want to track your car set it up properly. If you want a fast street car then the stock motor is just fine. Track abuse is 10 fold the abuse of street use. There is no way anyone can cover track use. There are too many factors outside of our control.
I think the warranty is right on point. The idea is that you can have a boosted everyday driver for the street with no worry. And let's be honest.... most ppl up here who boost do it for the street not the track.
05-01-2007, 07:28 PM
#44
nice job guys, i think its cool you are promoting your shop in a good way.
i like dynojets cause you cant "correct" them other than a couple corrections that are programmed into the program already.
trap speeds dont lie!!! thats why thats how we prove our cars....
dyno-shmyno who cares??
i like dynojets cause you cant "correct" them other than a couple corrections that are programmed into the program already.
trap speeds dont lie!!! thats why thats how we prove our cars....
dyno-shmyno who cares??
05-01-2007, 08:18 PM
#48
Banned
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Sterling, VA
Posts: 650
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Audible Mayhem
nice job guys, i think its cool you are promoting your shop in a good way.
i like dynojets cause you cant "correct" them other than a couple corrections that are programmed into the program already.
trap speeds dont lie!!! thats why thats how we prove our cars....
dyno-shmyno who cares??
i like dynojets cause you cant "correct" them other than a couple corrections that are programmed into the program already.
trap speeds dont lie!!! thats why thats how we prove our cars....
dyno-shmyno who cares??
05-01-2007, 08:20 PM
#49
Banned
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Sterling, VA
Posts: 650
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by dutchboy350Z
Speaking of, I know you guys have a video of the C6 destruction. When are you going to post it on youtube.
05-01-2007, 08:24 PM
#51
Banned
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Sterling, VA
Posts: 650
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by eagletanggreen
Dave shiroma? Are you the same guy that worked at AAM?
If so! Your a cool dude, you spent a whole morning trying to fit my AAM3".
That exhaust suck IMO, sounds awsome, but the fit is crap, and it keeps burning my bumper.
What? It sounds like I have poopy pantalones latley Yes, I cant find a place to stay at Z days, everything booked!
If so! Your a cool dude, you spent a whole morning trying to fit my AAM3".
That exhaust suck IMO, sounds awsome, but the fit is crap, and it keeps burning my bumper.
What? It sounds like I have poopy pantalones latley Yes, I cant find a place to stay at Z days, everything booked!
poopy pantalones???....well yo tengo el gato en mis pantalones
05-01-2007, 08:46 PM
#53
Turbo Whore
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: West suburbs of Chi-town
Posts: 7,303
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Now this is what I like to see from shops. RESULTS. Not claims of the 1000whp Z that they are "building".
Great job Dave and I look forward to what you guys can contribute to the 350Z forced induction community in the future.
EDIT: I knew this motor was stronger than people have ever given it credit for.
Great job Dave and I look forward to what you guys can contribute to the 350Z forced induction community in the future.
EDIT: I knew this motor was stronger than people have ever given it credit for.
05-01-2007, 09:43 PM
#54
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Get out my way pimpin, MD/PA
Posts: 5,568
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Function tuned...... thats whats up.... I saw this car in action on the dyno and during that race with the C6, and it was stupidly fast.. these guys are really pushing the limits and proving that it really is all in the tune... cant wait to see what they have in store for us next
05-01-2007, 09:44 PM
#55
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: N cal
Posts: 1,172
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
let me get this straight, so i like to romp on my car on the freeway. So if im deliberatly romping on my car on the freeway and it blows i'm under the FT warrenty?
Sorry if this is a question asked over and over again, waht if we are "racing" on the streets and the motor blows.
Sorry if this is a question asked over and over again, waht if we are "racing" on the streets and the motor blows.
05-02-2007, 06:12 AM
#58
Professional
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Virginia
Posts: 4,398
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
GREAT WORK GUYS. Dave, I saw many of the pulls on the dyno and Im truely confident I have finally found someone to take my car to the next level. From me seeing all the time you spent in that car on that dyno and the consistant numbers it was posting, it was truely something to see. I may be going FI after all. 
05-02-2007, 06:17 AM
#59
Awesome work guys. You have helped to prove something for the community...that many people suspected: Stock Head BOLTS are better than standard ARP head studs. 65ft ft/lbs just isnt enough to prevent issues with headlift. We even saw headlift on a built NA car at the circuit course, using standard ARP's. Switched to L19's at 92ft/lbs and problem solved. Sounds like we could have use just a set of OEM head bolts too. 
Audible..I think the days of adding additional correction factors to DD are over...at least in this community. In fact, the new software we are using on ours doesnt even have that function anymore. And Dave brought up another good point...shootout mode. Shootout mode locks out all the user changeable parameters, and is a pure number...undisputed. The numbers that Dave posted are obviously the "low" style DD numbers. 19psi on a dynojet, or with additional DJ corrections, would be well over 600whp.
Nice work guys!
Audible..I think the days of adding additional correction factors to DD are over...at least in this community. In fact, the new software we are using on ours doesnt even have that function anymore. And Dave brought up another good point...shootout mode. Shootout mode locks out all the user changeable parameters, and is a pure number...undisputed.
The numbers that Dave posted are obviously the "low" style DD numbers. 19psi on a dynojet, or with additional DJ corrections, would be well over 600whp.Nice work guys!
