Notices
Forced Induction Turbochargers and Superchargers..Got Boost?

How safe is reving to 7000rpm with a stock cylinder head/valve train????

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 7, 2010 | 10:38 PM
  #1  
djtimodj's Avatar
djtimodj
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 908
Likes: 5
From: UK
Default How safe is reving to 7000rpm with a stock cylinder head/valve train????

I've searched this and ally of NA guys rev to 7.2k on the stock DE motor. I have my rev limit set at 7k with a built bottom end but a stock rebuilt cylinder heads.

I know I won be making more power due to the stock cams being out of puff.

I just wanted to know how safe you guys think it will be reving that high now and again?
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2010 | 11:12 PM
  #2  
hellsoldiers08's Avatar
hellsoldiers08
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,520
Likes: 0
From: san antonio,tx
Default

i think honestly you be fine but y go out past the breathing room, if you cant breath :/ unless your tracking or drag racing and need that extra rpm over the line.
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2010 | 04:19 AM
  #3  
AJCaron12's Avatar
AJCaron12
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
From: NH
Default

English class here we ***
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2010 | 05:57 AM
  #4  
Vas_Z33's Avatar
Vas_Z33
New Member
iTrader: (39)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,712
Likes: 25
From: westchester NY
Default

Originally Posted by AJCaron12
English class here we ***
who are you? what a waste of a post.

dj- Id keep it within the stock redline, there really is no point in over revving ( I know you dont do a lot of drag so ) NA guys do it a lot because they got no power lol... but FI I wont trust the stock heads so much. Power falls on its face so no point.

Get some cams on that built motor!
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2010 | 06:44 AM
  #5  
binder's Avatar
binder
New Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,457
Likes: 7
From: terre haute, IN; STL, MO
Default

it's safe. Stock valvetrain has shown to hold up just fine to 7100 or 7200. The power might fall off, if it does no big deal because you can hold your rev longer as long as the power doesn't fall off severely.

The problem with revving high is the valve springs. I would worry about floating a valve up that high because the stock springs sack out with higher revs. So far i haven't seen any proof of **** being a problem at 7100 or so. As far as i know the rev-ups utilize the same valvesprings as the non-rev's and they are safe to 7100.
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2010 | 06:51 AM
  #6  
djamps's Avatar
djamps
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,492
Likes: 10
From: MD
Default

If you drag alot then keep it higher...otherwise why risk it.
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2010 | 09:06 AM
  #7  
duro78's Avatar
duro78
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,582
Likes: 0
From: ny
Default

It comes down to if the car will be producing any power above the stock redline if not then revving past redline is pointless you would just be putting unwanted stress on the valves for no reason
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2010 | 09:14 AM
  #8  
03threefiftyz's Avatar
03threefiftyz
350Z-holic
Premier Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 9,848
Likes: 118
From: Frederick, MD
Default

Mine has been set at 7200rpm for almost 2 years with no issue. My car tends to see those revs just about every weekend (most of the time 4-6 runs) without a problem so far.
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2010 | 09:39 AM
  #9  
Nexx's Avatar
Nexx
New Member
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 13,654
Likes: 8
From: DFW
Default

reving that high with a DE is tasteless, look at dyno and see your car fall on its face after 6500rpm.
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2010 | 09:46 AM
  #10  
03threefiftyz's Avatar
03threefiftyz
350Z-holic
Premier Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 9,848
Likes: 118
From: Frederick, MD
Default

In the 100's of runs I have made it is still faster to shift at 7000 than 6600.......just sayin'.
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2010 | 09:57 AM
  #11  
djamps's Avatar
djamps
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,492
Likes: 10
From: MD
Default

Originally Posted by 03threefiftyz
In the 100's of runs I have made it is still faster to shift at 7000 than 6600.......just sayin'.
Exactly...

Higher redline might be be falling on it's face but it does wonders on times/traps
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2010 | 10:07 AM
  #12  
Nexx's Avatar
Nexx
New Member
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 13,654
Likes: 8
From: DFW
Default

Originally Posted by 03threefiftyz
In the 100's of runs I have made it is still faster to shift at 7000 than 6600.......just sayin'.
i can see that especially if you it can save you from having to make another shift at the very end..
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2010 | 10:53 AM
  #13  
Alberto's Avatar
Alberto
Cranky FI Owner
Premier Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 34,715
Likes: 8
From: DMV
Default

Originally Posted by 03threefiftyz
Mine has been set at 7200rpm for almost 2 years with no issue. My car tends to see those revs just about every weekend (most of the time 4-6 runs) without a problem so far.
You dont have FI

OP-only do it in 1st and 2nd gear where you truly need it and you will be fine.

This is way crazy but I know a stock valvetrain car that revs to 8300rpm's and it makes anywhere from 500-860+whp. Would I recommend that? Hell no, but just know its been done and with success, the stock valvetrain is better than you think.

Now if you were stock bottm end Id recommend sticking to the stock redline.
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2010 | 10:54 AM
  #14  
Alberto's Avatar
Alberto
Cranky FI Owner
Premier Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 34,715
Likes: 8
From: DMV
Default

Originally Posted by Nexx
reving that high with a DE is tasteless, look at dyno and see your car fall on its face after 6500rpm.
Dont tell me that I rev 1st and 2nd to 8000rpm's in racing situations.

Now revving a DE with stock cams, yes...
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2010 | 10:59 AM
  #15  
Nexx's Avatar
Nexx
New Member
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 13,654
Likes: 8
From: DFW
Default

Originally Posted by Alberto
Dont tell me that I rev 1st and 2nd to 8000rpm's in racing situations.

Now revving a DE with stock cams, yes...
it does fall on its face but hey if its faster to rev that high and the results are there then i cant argue the faces. did you rev that high before your cams bert cause its all whole new ball games with your bc2's. oh and im still on the fence with cam selections, i cant seem to make up my mind between bc2's and bc3's. i initially thought bc3 but your feedback and experience has me leaning towards bc2's.,

Last edited by Nexx; Oct 8, 2010 at 11:00 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2010 | 11:00 AM
  #16  
thom000001's Avatar
thom000001
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,891
Likes: 1
From: Chicago
Default

6500rpm? Stock DE cams are done at 6200rpm....if you have every breathing mod done maybe 6500 it'll hold power but its gonna fall hard whenever it crests.

Rev'd my "old" car to 7200 at drag strip on stock heads/cams. I'm certain there was some valve float but it was just used at the strip (to keep it in 4th gear).

On street I didn't rev much passed 6500.....now with the BC Stage 3's.......rev rev rev

tom
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2010 | 11:03 AM
  #17  
03threefiftyz's Avatar
03threefiftyz
350Z-holic
Premier Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 9,848
Likes: 118
From: Frederick, MD
Default

Originally Posted by Alberto
You dont have FI
He has a built block, etc.....don't see why it matters what I am.....I stand by the fact that revving the car to 7200rpm (in first and second in particular) will be faster than shifting at 6500. Just sayin'. My old turbo integra (455whp) always ran faster shifting after the peak power...peak was ~8800 and I shifted at 9300.

I was simply pointing out that the stock valvetrain, in my experience, has no problem with going to 7200rpm.

Last edited by 03threefiftyz; Oct 8, 2010 at 11:11 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2010 | 06:51 AM
  #18  
Alberto's Avatar
Alberto
Cranky FI Owner
Premier Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 34,715
Likes: 8
From: DMV
Default

Originally Posted by 03threefiftyz
He has a built block, etc.....don't see why it matters what I am.....I stand by the fact that revving the car to 7200rpm (in first and second in particular) will be faster than shifting at 6500. Just sayin'. My old turbo integra (455whp) always ran faster shifting after the peak power...peak was ~8800 and I shifted at 9300.

I was simply pointing out that the stock valvetrain, in my experience, has no problem with going to 7200rpm.
An engine with FI and revving higher has more stress on valvetrain (valve springs) than an NA motor.

I havent seen an NA motor starting to show signs of valve float on any dyno, but I have with FI, big differance IMO

Your shift points are still correct though
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2010 | 07:22 AM
  #19  
kartkid's Avatar
kartkid
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
From: Montreal Canada
Default

Originally Posted by Alberto
An engine with FI and revving higher has more stress on valvetrain (valve springs) than an NA motor.

I havent seen an NA motor starting to show signs of valve float on any dyno, but I have with FI, big differance IMO

Your shift points are still correct though

Why? FI has no effect on Valve springs RPMs are RPMs
Valve float will occur at a given rpm due to spring sag
and tension no matter if it is FI or NA on the same motor.
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2010 | 07:24 AM
  #20  
midz350's Avatar
midz350
New Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,054
Likes: 24
From: around.
Default

What about the HR?

I'm debating whether setting the rev limiter to stock 7500rpm or 8000rpm (built bottom end with stock heads/cams)


I noticed the GTM STG 2 pull really harder in the higher rpm 6000+rpm.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:45 PM.