Notices
Forced Induction Turbochargers and Superchargers..Got Boost?

Dynosty tunes Momentum GT35R Turbo 350Z to 516whp! Pics

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-21-2011 | 09:08 AM
  #21  
AngelsVQ's Avatar
AngelsVQ
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 641
Likes: 0
From: Gilroy, ca
Default

I want that kit
Old 02-21-2011 | 09:25 AM
  #22  
james12345pt's Avatar
james12345pt
New Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 215
Likes: 7
From: asheville, nc
Default 516 whp

Nice numbers guys!! I noticed that the pistons are 9.3:1 compression compared to most built engines that are traditionally 8.5:1 to 8.8:1 compression in this platform. I supect the higher compression helped you achieve 500+whp where as the 8.5:1 engine are falling short of this number by 40-50 whp. This info would have been helpful when I was deciding on my build since 500 whp was my ultimate goal.
Old 02-21-2011 | 09:38 AM
  #23  
str8dum1's Avatar
str8dum1
New Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 8,807
Likes: 6
From: raleigh-wood NC
Default

that small bump in compression would not equal 40-50whp.

what was the temp/baro correction factor used on that dyno pull compared to the BP install you guys did the other week? Havent really followed the weather out there lately.

Which wastegate is on there? A big yellow is a 10psi spring for a F38, but I thought I read that kit uses the new MV-S gate, in which big yellow isnt an option.

The comment about needing more spring was referring to the stock 6 psi spring or the 10psi spring?

Last edited by str8dum1; 02-21-2011 at 09:49 AM.
Old 02-21-2011 | 09:39 AM
  #24  
Nexx's Avatar
Nexx
New Member
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 13,654
Likes: 8
From: DFW
Default

Originally Posted by james12345pt
Nice numbers guys!! I noticed that the pistons are 9.3:1 compression compared to most built engines that are traditionally 8.5:1 to 8.8:1 compression in this platform. I supect the higher compression helped you achieve 500+whp where as the 8.5:1 engine are falling short of this number by 40-50 whp. This info would have been helpful when I was deciding on my build since 500 whp was my ultimate goal.
8:5:1, 14 psi with twins and good exhaust flow should net you around 500whp on a dynojet.
Old 02-21-2011 | 09:44 AM
  #25  
ttg35fort's Avatar
ttg35fort
Professional
Premier Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,972
Likes: 2
From: South Florida
Default

Originally Posted by james12345pt
Nice numbers guys!! I noticed that the pistons are 9.3:1 compression compared to most built engines that are traditionally 8.5:1 to 8.8:1 compression in this platform. I supect the higher compression helped you achieve 500+whp where as the 8.5:1 engine are falling short of this number by 40-50 whp. This info would have been helpful when I was deciding on my build since 500 whp was my ultimate goal.
Your suspicion is incorrect. The difference in power loss between 9.3:1 and 8.5:1 compression ratios is about 1.5% (5% vs 6.5%) on a N/A motor. That's something like 7.5 hp on a 500 hp motor, nowhere near 40-50 hp.

When you are in boost with a turbo, the compression of the air/fuel mixture is effectively higher because you are pre-compressiong the air before it enters the cylinders. If you run enough boost, from the perspective of the burning of the air/fuel mixture, it will burn as efficiently as a high compression N/A motor. My suspicion is that 15 psi of boost with 8.5:1 compression will burn the air/fuel mixture as efficiently as a 13:1 N/A motor, though I have not specifically researched the subject. EDIT: it is actually more like 17:1 - see post below.

Here is a link to a chart of percent power loss vs compression ratio. I had it inserted as a pic, but it is too big and screws up the way this page of the thread is presented.

http://image.hotrod.com/f/editorials...nterprises.jpg

Last edited by ttg35fort; 02-21-2011 at 10:28 AM.
Old 02-21-2011 | 10:26 AM
  #26  
ttg35fort's Avatar
ttg35fort
Professional
Premier Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,972
Likes: 2
From: South Florida
Default

^^^

Here is the equation:

E = C((B/14.7) + 1)

Where
E = effective compression ratio
B = boost (in psi)
C = static compression ratio

So, if the static compression ratio is 8.5:1, the boost is 14.7 psi (I chose this for simplicity), the effective compression ratio is 17:1.

Thank you to Brian Cummiskey (whoever he is) in the hondaswap forum for providing the equation.

Last edited by ttg35fort; 02-21-2011 at 10:29 AM.
Old 02-21-2011 | 10:59 AM
  #27  
james12345pt's Avatar
james12345pt
New Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 215
Likes: 7
From: asheville, nc
Default

Originally Posted by str8dum1
that small bump in compression would not equal 40-50whp.

what was the temp/baro correction factor used on that dyno pull compared to the BP install you guys did the other week? Havent really followed the weather out there lately.

Which wastegate is on there? A big yellow is a 10psi spring for a F38, but I thought I read that kit uses the new MV-S gate, in which big yellow isnt an option.

The comment about needing more spring was referring to the stock 6 psi spring or the 10psi spring?
My statement was intended to point out that the higher compression was one of the factors for the increased whp not the only varible. I know when I went from my stock motor to a built one with 8.8:1 compression, I experienced a drop of 20-30 whp at the 8 lb boost level on the same dyno. There were other varibles like 264 cams, different turbo exhaust housing, etc, etc that could have affected the numbers as well.
Old 02-21-2011 | 11:37 AM
  #28  
james12345pt's Avatar
james12345pt
New Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 215
Likes: 7
From: asheville, nc
Default

P.S. Can't wait to see the different between the IP's DD and the dynojet results. IP's DD is truly an "Heartbreaker Dyno".
Old 02-21-2011 | 10:26 PM
  #29  
midz350's Avatar
midz350
New Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,054
Likes: 24
From: around.
Default

Please, more info/pics about the inline walbro pump.
Old 02-22-2011 | 03:45 AM
  #30  
XKR's Avatar
XKR
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 5,256
Likes: 0
From: Texas, Arizona,Cayman Island
Default

Impressive as always Hal...


BTW...Rumor is you are bringing the DD to ZdayZ
Old 02-22-2011 | 04:19 AM
  #31  
rh_334's Avatar
rh_334
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 497
Likes: 0
From: Alabama
Default

Originally Posted by bryan@momentum
Sorry to tease, but I couldn't get it on the dyno today, I have some dyno time early tomorrow. Sorry folks.
Starting to sound like another vendor around here
Old 02-22-2011 | 07:43 AM
  #32  
str8dum1's Avatar
str8dum1
New Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 8,807
Likes: 6
From: raleigh-wood NC
Default

ya it lets you extend a single walbro by keeping the pressure up. Not much more volume though. Just fine for that low-mid 600whp range.

Just using a single Aeromotive or DW 340lph is a better choice and I bet they will using that option
Old 02-22-2011 | 03:56 PM
  #33  
Resmarted's Avatar
Resmarted
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 3,493
Likes: 64
From: ur face
Default

I look at this car, and I think this would be the PERFECT application to test a GTX35R vs a standard....
Leave all parts identical and run similar timing and see what happens....
Old 02-22-2011 | 04:51 PM
  #34  
ttg35fort's Avatar
ttg35fort
Professional
Premier Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,972
Likes: 2
From: South Florida
Default

^^^

I like that idea too.
Old 02-22-2011 | 05:48 PM
  #35  
IslandZavage's Avatar
IslandZavage
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,413
Likes: 0
From: South FLA
Default

Originally Posted by bryan@momentum
I have a 5:00 pm EST dyno spot, I'll have the numbers up before dinner.
dinner has came and gone.. wheres the numbers???
Old 02-25-2011 | 06:58 AM
  #36  
str8dum1's Avatar
str8dum1
New Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 8,807
Likes: 6
From: raleigh-wood NC
Default

Seems like standard DD -> DJ conversion of 10%. But excellent prediction from Hal! Spot on!
Awesome #'s on pump gas with a single GT35r. Turbo still has more in it. Spin the motor out to 8000 rpms! Hopefully that will translate into the 67mm turbos being used in other kits!


Originally Posted by Hal@Dynosty
For anyone not familiar, our dyno reads very low. Momentum will have the Z on a Dynojet in the next few days and I expect to see 550-600whp on this same tune/power level. I will make sure this chart gets posted as well when it happens.
Originally Posted by bryan@momentum
ok folks a few minor set backs but nothing major, without further ado, the dyno jet numbers. Weather this morning was 62 degrees, 42% humidity, and 30.xx baro


Last edited by str8dum1; 02-25-2011 at 07:02 AM.
Old 02-25-2011 | 07:17 AM
  #37  
IslandZavage's Avatar
IslandZavage
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,413
Likes: 0
From: South FLA
Default

nice numbers......
Old 02-25-2011 | 09:16 AM
  #38  
deanfootlong's Avatar
deanfootlong
Registered User
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 532
Likes: 0
From: san diego
Default

what are you using to control boost?
Old 02-25-2011 | 12:16 PM
  #39  
El Verdugo's Avatar
El Verdugo
New Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 620
Likes: 2
From: Kenner
Default

Very wicked results and good to see how much power this engine makes on pump gas.
This kit really has impressed me.
Old 02-25-2011 | 12:28 PM
  #40  
BornSlippyZ's Avatar
BornSlippyZ
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,418
Likes: 2
From: Minnesota!
Default

Impressive work!


Quick Reply: Dynosty tunes Momentum GT35R Turbo 350Z to 516whp! Pics



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:58 PM.