Dynosty tunes Momentum GT35R Turbo 350Z to 516whp! Pics
#22
516 whp
Nice numbers guys!! I noticed that the pistons are 9.3:1 compression compared to most built engines that are traditionally 8.5:1 to 8.8:1 compression in this platform. I supect the higher compression helped you achieve 500+whp where as the 8.5:1 engine are falling short of this number by 40-50 whp. This info would have been helpful when I was deciding on my build since 500 whp was my ultimate goal.
#23
that small bump in compression would not equal 40-50whp.
what was the temp/baro correction factor used on that dyno pull compared to the BP install you guys did the other week? Havent really followed the weather out there lately.
Which wastegate is on there? A big yellow is a 10psi spring for a F38, but I thought I read that kit uses the new MV-S gate, in which big yellow isnt an option.
The comment about needing more spring was referring to the stock 6 psi spring or the 10psi spring?
what was the temp/baro correction factor used on that dyno pull compared to the BP install you guys did the other week? Havent really followed the weather out there lately.
Which wastegate is on there? A big yellow is a 10psi spring for a F38, but I thought I read that kit uses the new MV-S gate, in which big yellow isnt an option.
The comment about needing more spring was referring to the stock 6 psi spring or the 10psi spring?
Last edited by str8dum1; 02-21-2011 at 09:49 AM.
#24
Nice numbers guys!! I noticed that the pistons are 9.3:1 compression compared to most built engines that are traditionally 8.5:1 to 8.8:1 compression in this platform. I supect the higher compression helped you achieve 500+whp where as the 8.5:1 engine are falling short of this number by 40-50 whp. This info would have been helpful when I was deciding on my build since 500 whp was my ultimate goal.
#25
Nice numbers guys!! I noticed that the pistons are 9.3:1 compression compared to most built engines that are traditionally 8.5:1 to 8.8:1 compression in this platform. I supect the higher compression helped you achieve 500+whp where as the 8.5:1 engine are falling short of this number by 40-50 whp. This info would have been helpful when I was deciding on my build since 500 whp was my ultimate goal.
When you are in boost with a turbo, the compression of the air/fuel mixture is effectively higher because you are pre-compressiong the air before it enters the cylinders. If you run enough boost, from the perspective of the burning of the air/fuel mixture, it will burn as efficiently as a high compression N/A motor. My suspicion is that 15 psi of boost with 8.5:1 compression will burn the air/fuel mixture as efficiently as a 13:1 N/A motor, though I have not specifically researched the subject. EDIT: it is actually more like 17:1 - see post below.
Here is a link to a chart of percent power loss vs compression ratio. I had it inserted as a pic, but it is too big and screws up the way this page of the thread is presented.
http://image.hotrod.com/f/editorials...nterprises.jpg
Last edited by ttg35fort; 02-21-2011 at 10:28 AM.
#26
^^^
Here is the equation:
E = C((B/14.7) + 1)
Where
E = effective compression ratio
B = boost (in psi)
C = static compression ratio
So, if the static compression ratio is 8.5:1, the boost is 14.7 psi (I chose this for simplicity), the effective compression ratio is 17:1.
Thank you to Brian Cummiskey (whoever he is) in the hondaswap forum for providing the equation.
Here is the equation:
E = C((B/14.7) + 1)
Where
E = effective compression ratio
B = boost (in psi)
C = static compression ratio
So, if the static compression ratio is 8.5:1, the boost is 14.7 psi (I chose this for simplicity), the effective compression ratio is 17:1.
Thank you to Brian Cummiskey (whoever he is) in the hondaswap forum for providing the equation.
Last edited by ttg35fort; 02-21-2011 at 10:29 AM.
#27
that small bump in compression would not equal 40-50whp.
what was the temp/baro correction factor used on that dyno pull compared to the BP install you guys did the other week? Havent really followed the weather out there lately.
Which wastegate is on there? A big yellow is a 10psi spring for a F38, but I thought I read that kit uses the new MV-S gate, in which big yellow isnt an option.
The comment about needing more spring was referring to the stock 6 psi spring or the 10psi spring?
what was the temp/baro correction factor used on that dyno pull compared to the BP install you guys did the other week? Havent really followed the weather out there lately.
Which wastegate is on there? A big yellow is a 10psi spring for a F38, but I thought I read that kit uses the new MV-S gate, in which big yellow isnt an option.
The comment about needing more spring was referring to the stock 6 psi spring or the 10psi spring?
#31
#32
ya it lets you extend a single walbro by keeping the pressure up. Not much more volume though. Just fine for that low-mid 600whp range.
Just using a single Aeromotive or DW 340lph is a better choice and I bet they will using that option
Just using a single Aeromotive or DW 340lph is a better choice and I bet they will using that option
#36
Seems like standard DD -> DJ conversion of 10%. But excellent prediction from Hal! Spot on!
Awesome #'s on pump gas with a single GT35r. Turbo still has more in it. Spin the motor out to 8000 rpms! Hopefully that will translate into the 67mm turbos being used in other kits!
Awesome #'s on pump gas with a single GT35r. Turbo still has more in it. Spin the motor out to 8000 rpms! Hopefully that will translate into the 67mm turbos being used in other kits!
Last edited by str8dum1; 02-25-2011 at 07:02 AM.