Notices
Forced Induction Turbochargers and Superchargers..Got Boost?

Billet 76mm turbo experiment

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 15, 2011 | 06:05 AM
  #21  
thom000001's Avatar
thom000001
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,891
Likes: 1
From: Chicago
Default

I agree with rich!!!!!

you want the QSV. I was a Supra with that Turbo and QSV....Night and day difference in performance.

With QSV not activated it wasn't very close between him and me (him on 30psi E85, me on pump ).....with QSV goin it was dead even....he then went something like 10.7@137 on first pass on DR's.

Tom
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2011 | 11:15 AM
  #22  
Boosted Performance's Avatar
Boosted Performance
Thread Starter
Vendor - Former Vendor
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,782
Likes: 18
From: Edmonton, AB
Default

Originally Posted by thom000001
I agree with rich!!!!!

you want the QSV. I was a Supra with that Turbo and QSV....Night and day difference in performance.

With QSV not activated it wasn't very close between him and me (him on 30psi E85, me on pump ).....with QSV goin it was dead even....he then went something like 10.7@137 on first pass on DR's.

Tom
I don't see the 7675 T4 having a divided turbine option. PTE offers it only in open .81 and .96 T4.
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2011 | 11:19 AM
  #23  
thom000001's Avatar
thom000001
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,891
Likes: 1
From: Chicago
Default

whoops read what I wanted...it was on a 6765 not 76......but still!!!!! lol

Tom

Originally Posted by Boosted Performance
I don't see the 7675 T4 having a divided turbine option. PTE offers it only in open .81 and .96 T4.
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2011 | 12:00 PM
  #24  
Boosted Performance's Avatar
Boosted Performance
Thread Starter
Vendor - Former Vendor
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,782
Likes: 18
From: Edmonton, AB
Default

Originally Posted by thom000001
whoops read what I wanted...it was on a 6765 not 76......but still!!!!! lol

Tom
All good, I spend 10 minutes googling this magical twin scroll you speake of.... and then thought that there must be a mistake.


As far as the drag strip goes, we will give it to Hal to make a pass once tuning is done. He seems to know what he is doing when it comes to big singles

Last edited by Boosted Performance; Nov 15, 2011 at 12:01 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2011 | 12:00 PM
  #25  
binder's Avatar
binder
New Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,457
Likes: 7
From: terre haute, IN; STL, MO
Default

Originally Posted by jerryd87
lol hopfully you wont have to wait long im just itching to get back, if everything goes well i should be buying the engine middle of next month and you will be able to see the max out of the 6765. car should be getting loaded on the trailer sometime today to head to hawaii
you'lre goign to be about 6 months too late. I've already pushed mine with restrictive exhaust to 20psi on a mustang. This saturday with my cutout i'm planning on taking it to 3 bar on a dynojet. Based no my mustang numbers mid to upper 600's will be easy. It's already sitting at 560tq on 18psi on the mustang dyno.
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2011 | 12:01 PM
  #26  
binder's Avatar
binder
New Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,457
Likes: 7
From: terre haute, IN; STL, MO
Default

Originally Posted by thom000001
whoops read what I wanted...it was on a 6765 not 76......but still!!!!! lol

Tom
i really wanted this but i'm hitting 18psi right at 4k rpms so spool won't be a factor since i'm revving out to 8k.
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2011 | 12:04 PM
  #27  
Boosted Performance's Avatar
Boosted Performance
Thread Starter
Vendor - Former Vendor
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,782
Likes: 18
From: Edmonton, AB
Default

Originally Posted by binder
i really wanted this but i'm hitting 18psi right at 4k rpms so spool won't be a factor since i'm revving out to 8k.
That is a solid power band Jeff.
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2011 | 12:12 PM
  #28  
binder's Avatar
binder
New Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,457
Likes: 7
From: terre haute, IN; STL, MO
Default

Originally Posted by Boosted Performance
That is a solid power band Jeff.
yes it is....way too much for my street tires so i've found (even at 14psi).

oh for anyone that wants to know. The first pull untuned was 514hp on 16psi. A/f in the 9's and timing was only 12* at max rpm. I don't have the sheets to look through all the pulls though. the shop owner hasn't emailed any of them to me and i only checked the curves on a few pulls while i was tuning.
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2011 | 01:27 PM
  #29  
DaveJackson's Avatar
DaveJackson
Master
Premier Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 2,802
Likes: 69
From: Canada
Default

Originally Posted by binder
... i'm planning on taking it to 3 bar on a dynojet...
Sorry, but what does this mean? 3 bar = 44psi so I'm confused.
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2011 | 01:41 PM
  #30  
Dynosty's Avatar
Dynosty
Vendor - Former Vendor
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,137
Likes: 11
From: Louisville, KY
Default

^ he is probably including 1bar atmosphere, so 29psi boost
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2011 | 01:46 PM
  #31  
mafoor's Avatar
mafoor
Registered User
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
From: Chambersburg, PA
Default

Originally Posted by Boosted Performance
I don't see the 7675 T4 having a divided turbine option. PTE offers it only in open .81 and .96 T4.
Sasha, To get the 7675 in a divided housing you have to get the "GT42 Style", but its almost 3G's
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2011 | 02:27 PM
  #32  
Boosted Performance's Avatar
Boosted Performance
Thread Starter
Vendor - Former Vendor
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,782
Likes: 18
From: Edmonton, AB
Default

Originally Posted by mafoor
Sasha, To get the 7675 in a divided housing you have to get the "GT42 Style", but its almost 3G's
Thanks and I found it:

http://www.precisionturbo.net/Street...GT42-Style/280

That is crazy to have such a price difference just because it is "GT42" style.

I just called PTE, and I guess the entire turbo centre section is different and housings are not interchangable. The only thing available for that 7675 is a T4 .81 and .96 a/r hosing.
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2011 | 03:34 PM
  #33  
mafoor's Avatar
mafoor
Registered User
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
From: Chambersburg, PA
Default

Originally Posted by Boosted Performance
Thanks and I found it:

http://www.precisionturbo.net/Street...GT42-Style/280

That is crazy to have such a price difference just because it is "GT42" style.

I just called PTE, and I guess the entire turbo centre section is different and housings are not interchangable. The only thing available for that 7675 is a T4 .81 and .96 a/r hosing.
Yea tell me about it. I was looking online a little while ago to see if i could find the gt42 style cheaper but the cheapest i found it was like $2700.

I was wondering if the gt42 style was any bigger physically that the 7675. Im not too familiar with the garrett line so i have no idea how big the actual gt42 is physically.

So just out of curiosity at the moment lol if the gt42 style was about the same size as the 7675, would a QSV have a chance of fitting?
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2011 | 07:18 PM
  #34  
binder's Avatar
binder
New Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,457
Likes: 7
From: terre haute, IN; STL, MO
Default

Originally Posted by DaveJackson
Sorry, but what does this mean? 3 bar = 44psi so I'm confused.
Originally Posted by Hal@Dynosty
^ he is probably including 1bar atmosphere, so 29psi boost
Hal is correct I meant that i have a 3 bar map sensor so that's how far i plan on taking it on the dyno before i put the car away for the winter.

Put the mickey's on tonight and did some tuning up to 22psi. With 305 drag radials at 22psi it is not pretty on the street. I won't be doing any pulls above 18psi on the street again after tonight

Here is a little graph of the 6765 with a .96 a/r housing. I didn't start spool until 4k rpms so the boost shown is a little high in rpm. It's lower when i start at 3k rpms which i'll do later this week when i have time.

Sasha, does the 71mm have the divided housing? With what i'm doing on this 6765 I couldn't see anyone every wanting a 76mm for a car driven on the street. I actually was thinking about going to the 71mm but after tonight there is no way I want that in my car! Way too much for the street.
Attached Thumbnails Billet 76mm turbo experiment-spool_96ar.jpg  
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2011 | 08:06 PM
  #35  
Boosted Performance's Avatar
Boosted Performance
Thread Starter
Vendor - Former Vendor
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,782
Likes: 18
From: Edmonton, AB
Default

Originally Posted by mafoor
So just out of curiosity at the moment lol if the gt42 style was about the same size as the 7675, would a QSV have a chance of fitting?
I am sure I could make it work. I will be under the car tomorrow evening again, and will have a closer look. I don't know what the actual length of the QSV is (end of actuator to opposite side of T4 flange). I would have to order one and play around. I don't think it would be a big deal to get it in there.


Originally Posted by binder

Sasha, does the 71mm have the divided housing? With what i'm doing on this 6765 I couldn't see anyone every wanting a 76mm for a car driven on the street. I actually was thinking about going to the 71mm but after tonight there is no way I want that in my car! Way too much for the street.


The largest divided housing turbo that PTE offers is the 6766, and it is available as a divided in the following a/r's: 84, 1.0, 1.15, 1.32. That is great to hear though.
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2011 | 08:16 PM
  #36  
binder's Avatar
binder
New Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,457
Likes: 7
From: terre haute, IN; STL, MO
Default

Originally Posted by Boosted Performance


The largest divided housing turbo that PTE offers is the 6766, and it is available as a divided in the following a/r's: 84, 1.0, 1.15, 1.32. That is great to hear though.
I would say i would take one in a 1.0 a/r but i'm so sick of spending money and i don't race below 6k rpms anyways so i doubt it would make any difference in my setup. It would be fun to just have and brag about though!
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2011 | 09:08 PM
  #37  
Resmarted's Avatar
Resmarted
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 3,493
Likes: 64
From: ur face
Default

Originally Posted by binder
I would say i would take one in a 1.0 a/r but i'm so sick of spending money and i don't race below 6k rpms anyways so i doubt it would make any difference in my setup. It would be fun to just have and brag about though!
6766 would be great on our cars.

I still wouldn't go bigger than 7175 unless you are going sleeved... Sasha is your customer going to be sleeved?

I can't wait to get my sh*t rolling again... Getting real tired of waiting on this machine shop... -_- and then after it's all together getting a tune...
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2011 | 02:24 AM
  #38  
Vas_Z33's Avatar
Vas_Z33
New Member
iTrader: (39)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,712
Likes: 25
From: westchester NY
Default

damnit jeff is going to make power before I do..fml . I can't wait to see some numbers!
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2011 | 04:27 AM
  #39  
jerryd87's Avatar
jerryd87
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 2,439
Likes: 10
From: NE ohio
Default

thought you where running stock intake and stock cams though?


my bad just saw your revving to 8k so def not stock intake and cams rofl
Originally Posted by binder
you'lre goign to be about 6 months too late. I've already pushed mine with restrictive exhaust to 20psi on a mustang. This saturday with my cutout i'm planning on taking it to 3 bar on a dynojet. Based no my mustang numbers mid to upper 600's will be easy. It's already sitting at 560tq on 18psi on the mustang dyno.

Last edited by jerryd87; Nov 16, 2011 at 04:32 AM.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2011 | 05:09 AM
  #40  
binder's Avatar
binder
New Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,457
Likes: 7
From: terre haute, IN; STL, MO
Default

Originally Posted by Vas_Z33
damnit jeff is going to make power before I do..fml . I can't wait to see some numbers!
i'm already making more numbers than that american turd will ever make I keed, but seriously more numbers

Originally Posted by jerryd87
thought you where running stock intake and stock cams though?


my bad just saw your revving to 8k so def not stock intake and cams rofl
ya, i have ported heads and 264 cams. Dual spring ferrea valve springs and all ferrea hardware. Heads are ported out quite a bit so i didn't want to get crazy with cams and shift my curve too far to the right. It's putting it down pretty good in this configuration
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:57 AM.