question about CR pistons..
Drive your Vortech with 8:8:1 compression on the streets in normal driving conditions and you'll probably want to change to a TT setup much sooner than 2 years. 8.8:1 will suck ***** for a street driven Vortech setup. Listen to the3kgt2, phunk2 (Charles@CJM), and Triji. I'd go with 8.8:1 only if you intend to go with a turbo setup sooner than later.
I'm not really sure what that's supposed to mean? Is he supposed to put the 8.8:1 pistons later when he gets the turbo kit IE just tear it all apart and rebuild it? That sounds like a poor financial decision lol.
Anyway...
OldManZ350 has a great point. If you're going to really push on the built engine you want the low compression (I probably would do it at anything projected over 600whp). If you want a simple low boost street car, you can definitely make even a 10.5:1 work with ethanol or water meth + pump. Maybe even pump if your area has something at least equivalent to 95ron.
Personally I went with a 9.5, and not a higher CR because I am stuck with 91 oct as 'premium' fuel here where I am... E85 is available but the stations are few and far between and I did not want to be stuck hunting for a station when low on fuel.
Same here. I was knocking a little with stock 10.3:1, a 3.12 pulley, SCi impeller, and 91 octane. I dropped cr to 9.5:1 because I upgraded to an Si impeller, larger cams, and might drop to a smaller pulley. 91 octane sucks.
OP,
What are your horsepower goals and intended use for your car? Daily driver? Any track use? If so, what kind of track use?
Last edited by RudeG_v2.0; Aug 25, 2013 at 10:04 AM.
It means that I'd recommend going with the 8.8:1 or 9:1 on his current build only if he intends to install the turbo kit now or in the very near future (not 2 years from now), because it will be a dog on his Vortech setup. 99% of Vortech guys don't push their Vortech beyond 450whp, let alone to 550-600whp+ where 8.8:1 would be prudent. I didn't see the OP state that he was going for big #'s on the Vortech either.
OP,
What are your horsepower goals and intended use for your car? Daily driver? Any track use? If so, what kind of track use?
OP,
What are your horsepower goals and intended use for your car? Daily driver? Any track use? If so, what kind of track use?
He did say he's going with a 928 impeller and 2.87 pulley. Don't know how close to 500whp that would put him... I guess it depends on other mods. Probably should pick up some cams depending on the motor if he's going with longtubes etc.
I was also going to say I'd go with the 8.8's so you could spray down the road and make more power easily. But 9's would be fine with a small shot for sure.
OP if you go with anything close to a 10 just make sure you get FI and not NA pistons: NA pistons will be thinner and 10:1, not just 10:1
Thread Starter
New Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 317
Likes: 0
From: Dominican Republic
I will go 8.8 becuase i will want to put like 400-430whp and here cars with station gas are all between 350-380 because of knock.. i want it to weekend street drive car and i dont want to push it to the limit... i will go low even in low rpm i feel it doggy... i have a question for all of you... i have long tube header and i feel that jt have to much free flow in low rpm and i have very low torq.... i can pht a magnaflow H muffler or resonator on my Y pipe??? i have nismo cat back...
I will go 8.8 becuase i will want to put like 400-430whp and here cars with station gas are all between 350-380 because of knock.. i want it to weekend street drive car and i dont want to push it to the limit... i will go low even in low rpm i feel it doggy... i have a question for all of you... i have long tube header and i feel that jt have to much free flow in low rpm and i have very low torq.... i can pht a magnaflow H muffler or resonator on my Y pipe??? i have nismo cat back...
Long tubes will reduce your low end usually. I would upgrade your Y pipe to a twin 2.5" to 3" and then a straight through muffler at the end (vibrant, magnaflow, borla all of them make 'turbo' mufflers).
Thread Starter
New Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 317
Likes: 0
From: Dominican Republic
here is a pain in the *** look for methanol i think... tomorrow i will call my tuner to see if he had tuned water meth cars...
I dont know to much about that kit... wich one its the better cheaper kit?? i know snow performance and aem....
I dont know to much about that kit... wich one its the better cheaper kit?? i know snow performance and aem....
Last edited by max-hid; Aug 25, 2013 at 05:07 PM.
Thread Starter
New Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 317
Likes: 0
From: Dominican Republic
i was looking for some information and this look interesting...
http://www.turbomirage.com/water-alc...arts-list.html
http://www.turbomirage.com/water-alc...arts-list.html
if you are only looking for mid 400s, there's absolutely no reason to build the motor at all unless yours has poor compression/leakdown.
I wouldnt do anything less than 10:1.
I wouldnt do anything less than 10:1.
I don't understand why nobody brought up the fact that static compression is always adjustable on the vq because of the cam phasers, stick to 9.5+ make the rest up with good tuning and gasoline, focus on good rods,good bearings and a competent engine builder for longevity instead.
I think you mean Dynamic Compression!!!!!
I don't understand why nobody brought up the fact that static compression is always adjustable on the vq because of the cam phasers, stick to 9.5+ make the rest up with good tuning and gasoline, focus on good rods,good bearings and a competent engine builder for longevity instead.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post










