Notices
Forced Induction Turbochargers and Superchargers..Got Boost?

Single 35R guys, has anyone swapped their a/r housing for a smaller size?

Old 06-11-2015, 09:13 AM
  #1  
Twenty4
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
Twenty4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: newbury park, CA
Posts: 414
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Single 35R guys, has anyone swapped their a/r housing for a smaller size?

I am currently running a Garrett gt3582r with a 1.03 a/r on my single turbo 350z and it is rather laggy. Its a momentum single kit. I was planning on selling the current turbo and downsizing to a gtx3076 with .82 a/r for quicker spool and a bit less horsepower. Car is currently making 430 wheel on 110 octane and 14psi. Looking to go down to around 375 on pump gas. Would I be better off with the turbo downsize or simply replacing my housing to a .63 a/r or .82 a/r on the 3582r?
Old 06-11-2015, 11:21 AM
  #2  
Highway Riding
New Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Highway Riding's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Out on the Highway!
Posts: 5,543
Received 95 Likes on 80 Posts
Default

I would vote for a .82 A/R
Old 06-11-2015, 12:05 PM
  #3  
thatv35guy
New Member
iTrader: (1)
 
thatv35guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 723
Received 59 Likes on 47 Posts
Default

I had a .82 housing, upgraded to a 1.06 housing to reduce exhaust back pressure, etc.; didn't really notice a significant difference in spool.
Old 06-11-2015, 12:32 PM
  #4  
Highway Riding
New Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Highway Riding's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Out on the Highway!
Posts: 5,543
Received 95 Likes on 80 Posts
Default

Bam! listen to thatv35guy.... Back pressure is not good.
Old 06-11-2015, 01:38 PM
  #5  
Twenty4
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
Twenty4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: newbury park, CA
Posts: 414
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Im thinking .82 might be my best of both worlds solution, since I'm not looking to push a ton of power.
Old 06-11-2015, 03:23 PM
  #6  
thatv35guy
New Member
iTrader: (1)
 
thatv35guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 723
Received 59 Likes on 47 Posts
Default

IMO, I don’t think the extra spool is worth the time and money…
Old 06-11-2015, 04:07 PM
  #7  
WTFMike
New Member
iTrader: (2)
 
WTFMike's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Scottsdale,Az
Posts: 690
Received 46 Likes on 35 Posts
Default

I have the 1.06, it doesn't seem too laggy to me.
Old 06-11-2015, 08:41 PM
  #8  
Twenty4
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
Twenty4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: newbury park, CA
Posts: 414
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Im also currently not utilizing a boost controller. From what I've been researching, the combination of the smaller a/r and a controller can make a pretty big difference?
Old 06-11-2015, 11:36 PM
  #9  
tcode
New Member
iTrader: (7)
 
tcode's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: EU/Croatia
Posts: 444
Received 61 Likes on 37 Posts
Default

Smaller A/R won't bring you that much difference in spool, if any. But definitely will backpressure problem.

Instead, look into boost and exhaust leaks and use boost controller. Boosting with WG spring only is the slowest possible boost building.
Old 06-18-2015, 09:03 AM
  #10  
G3po
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
 
G3po's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Nor Cal.
Posts: 1,635
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default ST spool

If you have not , should get your tuner to pull in the cam phasing.
On my MTM set up , was able to improve spool by a few 100 RPM by doing so.

Also on an ST setup where the hot pipes are longer. It is much more important to have your hot pipes ceramic coated to minimize heat loss. I also have the hot side Tial housing coated. You will also a notice a bigger difference in spool depending upon how warmed up thodr pipes are. This is less noticeable than on a twin setup.

Last edited by G3po; 06-18-2015 at 09:05 AM.
Old 06-23-2015, 07:40 AM
  #11  
str8dum1
New Member
iTrader: (11)
 
str8dum1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: raleigh-wood NC
Posts: 8,807
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

define "pull in cam phasing"

thanks!
Old 06-23-2015, 12:15 PM
  #12  
G3po
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
 
G3po's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Nor Cal.
Posts: 1,635
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

move the intake cam to exhaust cam phasing to minimize overlap in the early mid range.

OEM slope sets the phasing to improve mid range emissions via overlap (ie the EGR effect). That effect aids emission but slows turbo spool. Uprev now supports cam phase tuning and that is one tool I used to improve my ST spool. It was more important ot me , sicne I recently swapped in hotter JWT C2 cams.

Last edited by G3po; 06-23-2015 at 12:16 PM.
Old 06-24-2015, 08:38 AM
  #13  
str8dum1
New Member
iTrader: (11)
 
str8dum1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: raleigh-wood NC
Posts: 8,807
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

since you add C2's which have a ton more overlap and duration, you must have had to add a lot more advance to reduce it back to stock levels.

Last edited by str8dum1; 06-24-2015 at 08:40 AM.
Old 06-24-2015, 08:49 AM
  #14  
G3po
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
 
G3po's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Nor Cal.
Posts: 1,635
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default ST spool

Not totally back to stock spool levels , since I run 9:1 CR .

With C2s , adding some timing and moving the intake cam phasing , the spool delay was minimized to only ~200RPM over stock cams.
My idle is smooth as stock and picked up ~40 rwhp at same PSI with the C2s. Overall a great improvement in driveability. Smoothed out Torque spiking , which allowed more timing advance to be rolled in early

The intake CAM re-phasing made the most difference in spool improvement
.A good tool that should be pursued by those looking for spool time improvement.
Old 06-30-2015, 10:18 AM
  #15  
ge35es
Registered User
 
ge35es's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: ontaro canada
Posts: 48
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

there have been studies on intake manifold pressure : exhaust manifold pressure.
for the street the rule of thumb is 1:2 which will give you boost earlier
for racing its a balance of that up to 1 : .5 (indycars etc)

when going with a smaller AR make sure your wastegate is large enough to handle the extra exhaust you will be venting.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
kyin
New Owners
12
10-15-2015 05:54 AM
EnjukuRacing
Coupons
0
09-09-2015 08:13 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Single 35R guys, has anyone swapped their a/r housing for a smaller size?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:01 PM.