Notices
Forced Induction Turbochargers and Superchargers..Got Boost?

Let's have a discussion. IS .040 over to much for a boosted motor?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-03-2015, 02:39 PM
  #1  
Colombo
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
Colombo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: tampa
Posts: 1,092
Received 42 Likes on 32 Posts
Default Let's have a discussion. IS .040 over to much for a boosted motor?

So as some of you know. My block took some scaring and I am considering boring it out to .040 over. I have heard an entire fleet of sides on this. Some say no issues what so ever. Others say NO WAY. Yet I have yet to see any FACTUAL reason why nor has anyone showed any proof of issues w .040 over. Let's have this discussion. I already have another stock block on the way to me. I may just punch that block to .020 over and run or maybe I will run this 1 at .040 over. I would LOVE to hear some ideas or better yet proof as to what is so dangerous and why YES or why NOT. I've spoken with a few machine shops local and abroad. There does not seem to be a general consensus. To those against. The idea I am getting is either A: the sleeve is too thin and will crack (yet no one seems to know of a cracked sleeve of any kind under 8-900whp) or B: it will cause more heat on the coolant and cause cooling issues. I would love to have and more so hear from those more knowledgable than I.
Old 12-03-2015, 02:49 PM
  #2  
tonyzS/C03
New Member
iTrader: (3)
 
tonyzS/C03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Va Beach
Posts: 822
Received 12 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Dooooo ittttttt!!!!!!!!
Old 12-03-2015, 03:36 PM
  #3  
Colombo
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
Colombo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: tampa
Posts: 1,092
Received 42 Likes on 32 Posts
Default






For comparison sake. How minute even .040 is. And it's this much from the circumference of the cylinder. It's not like it's all in 1 spot.
Old 12-03-2015, 05:22 PM
  #4  
Conway_160
New Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Conway_160's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Pan Handle
Posts: 2,559
Received 341 Likes on 280 Posts
Default

Personally "no leg to fall on" I would say the difference between .020 and .040 is so small I would do it if it was my motor. The sleeves are plenty thick to loose .040" in circumference and still boost it.
Old 12-03-2015, 11:33 PM
  #5  
Resmarted
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Resmarted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: ur face
Posts: 3,493
Received 64 Likes on 49 Posts
Default

I had my motor .04 over for my wiseco pistons (for extra thermal expansion of low silicone in my pistons+original hp goals). Anything more and you're pushing it but it should be fine for your application.
Old 12-07-2015, 11:53 AM
  #6  
OldManZ350
New Member
iTrader: (23)
 
OldManZ350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,425
Received 230 Likes on 170 Posts
Default

They have been doing SBC blocks and a ton of others, .030" and .060" for 50 years.
Old 12-07-2015, 06:37 PM
  #7  
Conway_160
New Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Conway_160's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Pan Handle
Posts: 2,559
Received 341 Likes on 280 Posts
Default

Are SBC closed decked motors?
Old 12-07-2015, 06:43 PM
  #8  
OldManZ350
New Member
iTrader: (23)
 
OldManZ350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,425
Received 230 Likes on 170 Posts
Default

True, it's also 50+ year old Technology and is a Sand Casted Block.

Meaning, that the Cores used in the Sand Casting Process can shift or move as much as .060" or more.

.030" over is the first size available back then. Then .060", and then .090"


Originally Posted by Conway_160
Are SBC closed decked motors?

Last edited by OldManZ350; 12-07-2015 at 06:53 PM.
Old 12-07-2015, 08:12 PM
  #9  
Resmarted
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Resmarted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: ur face
Posts: 3,493
Received 64 Likes on 49 Posts
Default

SBC machining has nothing to do with vq35. The vq35 has thinner aluminum sleeves. The concern here is not removing too mach material, and compromising the strength of the sleeves (especially with open deck).
Old 12-07-2015, 08:18 PM
  #10  
OldManZ350
New Member
iTrader: (23)
 
OldManZ350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,425
Received 230 Likes on 170 Posts
Default

These is No Cencern here.......

You Build your Motors You way, I'll Build them mine.....





Originally Posted by Resmarted
SBC machining has nothing to do with vq35. The vq35 has thinner aluminum sleeves. The concern here is not removing too mach material, and compromising the strength of the sleeves (especially with open deck).
Old 12-07-2015, 08:25 PM
  #11  
OldManZ350
New Member
iTrader: (23)
 
OldManZ350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,425
Received 230 Likes on 170 Posts
Default

Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain.
Old 12-08-2015, 02:34 PM
  #12  
Resmarted
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Resmarted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: ur face
Posts: 3,493
Received 64 Likes on 49 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by OldManZ350
These is No Cencern here.......

You Build your Motors You way, I'll Build them mine.....
Here you go again

Nobody even knows what you're talking about.


LSX and SBC machining clearances for sleeves are different than VQ35 clearances. As in how much you can take out of one sleeve is different than the other.

You do this kind of thing a lot man. I'm not upset, and I don't think anyone else is, but you find really weird and non-nonsensical ways to buttheads on here.
Old 12-14-2015, 01:38 PM
  #13  
OldManZ350
New Member
iTrader: (23)
 
OldManZ350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,425
Received 230 Likes on 170 Posts
Default

Well Happy Holidays to You Man........




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:16 AM.