Notices
Forced Induction Turbochargers and Superchargers..Got Boost?

Turbonetics kit PTE 6262

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 15, 2017 | 03:46 PM
  #1  
Knifey McStabb's Avatar
Knifey McStabb
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
From: oklahoma
Default Turbonetics kit PTE 6262


Has anybody replaced the 60-1 from the turbonetics kit with a precision 6262? I'm planning on doing this but I want to make sure it clears everything since the 60-1 is already jammed against the corner of the radiator. Any help is greatly appreciated.
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2017 | 04:10 PM
  #2  
CK_32's Avatar
CK_32
New Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 3,635
Likes: 366
From: California
Default

Yikes that's tight...

How's the heat soak on that?
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2017 | 04:15 PM
  #3  
Knifey McStabb's Avatar
Knifey McStabb
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
From: oklahoma
Default

Originally Posted by CK_32
Yikes that's tight...

How's the heat soak on that?
Not too bad. Took a long trip from NC to GA and back without any issues. I'm just worried that the compressor housing of the precision will be larger and won't fit
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2017 | 08:24 AM
  #4  
My3FiddyZ's Avatar
My3FiddyZ
New Member
 
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 68
Likes: 30
From: Nebraska
Default

I'll be revisiting this thread after some time. I'm just now installing my t60 turbonetics kit but I've contemplated that when the turbo does go or the block is finally built, i'll be ditching it for a precision 6266 as well. For my power goals, it might not also be necessary and could probably just get a replacement T60 with the ball bearing upgrade and just be happy around the 500's.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2017 | 08:50 AM
  #5  
iideadeyeii's Avatar
iideadeyeii
New Member
10 Year Member
Community Favorite
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,029
Likes: 479
From: Lawtown
Default

Originally Posted by CK_32

How's the heat soak on that?
Has has a blanket on his. Mine makes the metal housing behind the headlight almost unable to touch...need a blanket
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2017 | 08:27 PM
  #6  
Knifey McStabb's Avatar
Knifey McStabb
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
From: oklahoma
Default

Bump for useful answers
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2017 | 09:26 PM
  #7  
CK_32's Avatar
CK_32
New Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 3,635
Likes: 366
From: California
Default

You want me to measure my 6266?

That of any use?
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2017 | 05:59 PM
  #8  
BoostedProbe's Avatar
BoostedProbe
New Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 773
Likes: 5
From: Edmoton, AB
Default

6262 is too small for the VQ. Get the 6266, and if you plan on using the T3 housing, go with the largest available, which unfortunately is still on the small side.

Make sure you get the E compressor cover to maximize space, as it has the 3" inlet, and 2" outlet.
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2017 | 06:43 AM
  #9  
Knifey McStabb's Avatar
Knifey McStabb
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
From: oklahoma
Default

Originally Posted by CK_32
You want me to measure my 6266?

That of any use?
It might help a bit. What setup are you running it on?
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2017 | 06:52 AM
  #10  
Knifey McStabb's Avatar
Knifey McStabb
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
From: oklahoma
Default

Originally Posted by BoostedProbe
6262 is too small for the VQ. Get the 6266, and if you plan on using the T3 housing, go with the largest available, which unfortunately is still on the small side.

Make sure you get the E compressor cover to maximize space, as it has the 3" inlet, and 2" outlet.
I had my sights on the 6262 with the ported S cover which is the 4 inch inlet and 2.5 inch outlet. Why do you say the 6262 is too small?
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2017 | 08:26 PM
  #11  
BoostedProbe's Avatar
BoostedProbe
New Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 773
Likes: 5
From: Edmoton, AB
Default

Originally Posted by Knifey McStabb
I had my sights on the 6262 with the ported S cover which is the 4 inch inlet and 2.5 inch outlet. Why do you say the 6262 is too small?
You need a bigger turbine wheel for higher efficiency. I use 6266's in a T4 1.15 a/r twin scroll turbines as standard size for turbo kits. The 6262 will choke the engine.
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2017 | 02:31 AM
  #12  
Knifey McStabb's Avatar
Knifey McStabb
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
From: oklahoma
Default

Originally Posted by BoostedProbe
You need a bigger turbine wheel for higher efficiency. I use 6266's in a T4 1.15 a/r twin scroll turbines as standard size for turbo kits. The 6262 will choke the engine.
I plan on using the t3 .82 a/r. You're saying that will not flow enough? Keep in mind this is going to be on a stock block build and under 10 psi
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2017 | 05:48 AM
  #13  
Highway Riding's Avatar
Highway Riding
New Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 5,543
Likes: 95
From: Out on the Highway!
Default

T3 = too small. That would be a nice torque monster via back pressure
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2017 | 05:50 AM
  #14  
iideadeyeii's Avatar
iideadeyeii
New Member
10 Year Member
Community Favorite
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,029
Likes: 479
From: Lawtown
Default

Why change at all? I don't see a point
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2017 | 09:48 AM
  #15  
CK_32's Avatar
CK_32
New Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 3,635
Likes: 366
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by Knifey McStabb
It might help a bit. What setup are you running it on?
I'm going to run one of boosted performance kits.

Luckily I'm lazy and it's still in the box in the garage so I can measure it easily.

I'll try and measure it when I get home. If I remember.
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2017 | 07:38 AM
  #16  
Knifey McStabb's Avatar
Knifey McStabb
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
From: oklahoma
Default

Originally Posted by Highway Riding
T3 = too small. That would be a nice torque monster via back pressure
I see what you're saying but it'll suit my needs for now.
Originally Posted by iideadeyeii
Why change at all? I don't see a point
It appears that the seals on the current turbo are going bad for the second time. I bought the kit used and the previous owner already had the turbo rebuilt once before. I'd like to use a more reliable turbo instead of doing multiple rebuilds
Reply




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:15 AM.