Notices
Forced Induction Turbochargers and Superchargers..Got Boost?

Bad news for the big boosters...!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-26-2004, 05:54 PM
  #21  
Guru
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
 
Guru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Novi, MI
Posts: 198
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Just clamp the voltage. The E-Manage can do this no problem. Thej just take control of the injectors (again with the e-manage). Voila. The S-AFC is just too basic of a device for boost on this car.
Old 02-26-2004, 07:16 PM
  #22  
GamblerZ
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
GamblerZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Lubbock, TX
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

This problem reminds me of when the Z32 goes into "Safety Boost". You can find some information here:

http://www.twinturbo.net/ttnetfaq/FA...fetyboost.html

1. Doesn't the MAF have to be a minimum distance from the turbo?

2. Is the MAF large enough to handle the metering(ie. Cobra Pro-M MAF)
Old 02-26-2004, 07:46 PM
  #23  
spazpilot
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
spazpilot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Carrollton TX
Posts: 963
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Mike and tim:


I have not had this issue with my kit at 8psi yet, but then again I am trying to deal with the exhaust leaks I am getting. The only thing I am running is the TS ecu with 380 injectors instead of greddy fuel system. You think it might be setup related? Once I get these darn leaks fixed I will turn up the boost. Will I be able to tell when it goes into limp mode? The only other fix would be is that on the profec e-01 that I am using as a boost controller I can set boost based on rpm. run 7psi before 5000 and then turn it up from there. thanks CJ
Old 02-27-2004, 07:32 AM
  #24  
Ultimate Racing
Registered User
 
Ultimate Racing's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by Guru
Just clamp the voltage. The E-Manage can do this no problem. Thej just take control of the injectors (again with the e-manage). Voila. The S-AFC is just too basic of a device for boost on this car.
I agree. The E-Manage will definitely do the trick. I'm actually a bit surprised your tuners never throught to clamp the MAF signal to the ECU when creating your setup.

Darryl
Old 02-27-2004, 07:36 AM
  #25  
SKiDaZZLe
Charter Member #34
Thread Starter
 
SKiDaZZLe's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: -
Posts: 1,228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

neither tim, nor i, have an e-manage installed in the car...

i think i will give the clamping a try, though.


m


Originally posted by Ultimate Racing
I agree. The E-Manage will definitely do the trick. I'm actually a bit surprised your tuners never throught to clamp the MAF signal to the ECU when creating your setup.

Darryl
Old 02-27-2004, 10:45 AM
  #26  
etx
Registered User
 
etx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Detroit, The Motor City
Posts: 949
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Here is an easy to build adjustible clamping circut. The shack should carry all the components to build one, so you don't have to wait for digikey. I have used this unit on a few cars and it works great. It refers to a MAP sensor, but that's because it's a mopar site. It works the same...

http://www.fwdmopar.com/sites/dennis/howto.html

Let us know what you find!

Last edited by etx; 02-27-2004 at 10:49 AM.
Old 02-27-2004, 10:52 AM
  #27  
12SecZ
Registered User
 
12SecZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: NOR - CAL
Posts: 4,686
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Do you get a CEL or any indicators like sputtering or anything at limp mode? I am running 9PSI and was wondering how you would know or what to look for because I have never felt any power loss at WOT and like you said I have a Blower not a turbo.
Old 02-27-2004, 10:59 AM
  #28  
g356gear
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
 
g356gear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Man in the Sun
Posts: 2,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by 12SecZ
Do you get a CEL or any indicators like sputtering or anything at limp mode? I am running 9PSI and was wondering how you would know or what to look for because I have never felt any power loss at WOT and like you said I have a Blower not a turbo.
You're answer is at the beginning of the thread.
Old 02-27-2004, 11:12 AM
  #29  
12SecZ
Registered User
 
12SecZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: NOR - CAL
Posts: 4,686
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Gotcha but then someowhere along the line someone came in and said the ATI did the same thing???

That is where I got concerned and this

'There also are no OBD2 codes stored... but, if you clear the engine codes with an OBD2 scanner, the limp mode goes away."

What exactly is this saying, if you do an ECU reset it runs better even though there are no codes stored? What is it ressetting I wonder? I'm still getting code 175 bank two rich and getting frustrated but my car runs fine no symptoms like he mentions.
Old 02-27-2004, 01:03 PM
  #30  
t32gzz
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
t32gzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Lewisville, TX
Posts: 942
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Believe me when you hit the limp mode, there is no mistaking what has happened. For those who have not had the experience, the car makes a loud pop in the exhaust, car immediately loses all rpm's and when you come to a stop the idle bounces between 1,000 and 1,500 rpm's.

Cheston - Michael's MAF is in the factory housing, and mine was welded into the piping coming off the IC. After thinking about this, we are going to remount the MAF in the factory housing and see what happens. As Michael said, it happens alot more on my car and is easy to duplicate the situation.

With that being said, it still has happened twice on Michael's car, once on the dyno and once on the street, and we believe it is happening for the same reason. The larger pipe may work, but if we can solve the problem clamping the voltage, then it is an easy fix, at least for the short term.

Max - As far as clearing the non existent codes, I do not know what to tell you, but it works. No code, no CEL, but clear codes on the OBD II and car comes out of limp mode.

TS has not been running the car over 8psi, so maybe they haven't hit limp mode due to lack of boost. Cheston, where does PE have the MAF. Where is the BOV and how are you controlling idle?
Old 02-27-2004, 02:50 PM
  #31  
Chebosto
350Z-holic
Premier Member
iTrader: (43)
 
Chebosto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Redondo Beach, CA
Posts: 10,681
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Been searching like a blood hound on the net..

looks like the SE-R/SUNNY guys have seen this b4..


**** start ****

Firstly - Background

(If you object to me using Horse Power (hp) as a measurement of airflow,
simply substitute in CFM or whatever you're happier with...)

Air Flow Meters (AFM), a.k.a Mass Airflow Meters (MAF):

The basic function of any ECU is simple. Calculate the correct amount of
fuel and ignition advance required by the engine at any time. To make these
calculations it needs to sense how much "load' the engine is under.

The primary load sensor on the Nissan ECCS ECUs is the Air Flow Meter. It is
the ECUs biggest asset and also it's achilles heel (from a performance
viewpoint).

The AFM measures the true mass of air entering the engine. Since mass of air
entering the engine is known, determining the mass of fuel required for an
appropriate Air Fuel Ratio is a straight forward calculation. This also
means the majority of modifications will not require a retune, unlike MAP
based systems.

Unfortunately the standard AFM can be a considerable restriction in the
intake. A 50mm diameter is not a large area for a turbo to draw through.
AFMs also have a set operating range from 0-5V, representing a flow of air
from 0 to their max rating. 5V on a CA18DET AFM is equivalent to enough air
to make around 200hp. 5V on a 300ZX TT AFM is enough for over 500hp.
Fortunately, retuning for a larger, less restrictive AFM is possible.

Once the CA18 ECU senses the AFM is at its limit (ie at or close to 5V), it
will cut fuel to protect the engine. The dreaded boost cut. Or more
accurately, Air Flow Cut.

Once the Airflow meter is at 5v, any increase in flow will still result in a
reading of 5v, as the sensor is at its limit. The ECU can no longer
calculate the correct amount of fuel, so it shuts down the engine to prevent
a lean out. Once the AFM reads below 5v, the ECU will inject fuel once
again.

--

ECU Injection Calculation - Overview

Ok, we need to know about a few of the ECU's basic variables first.


K Required Number:
This constant is the basic injector pulsewidth time. All calculations of
injector pulsewidth start here. If you make it larger, all injector
pulsewidths will get longer. If you make it smaller, all injector
pulsewidths will get shorter. This is a very powerful tool when it comes to
changing injectors, AFMs etc.

VQ Map:
The VQ Map is used to translate the AFMs non-linear voltage response, into a
linear load reading. Confused? Don't worry too much. For the moment just
think of the VQ Map as a "filter" that the AFM voltage goes through, and
gives a load percentage as a result.

Eg, 5v = 100%,
4v = 75% etc...

Fuel Maps:
The ECU has two fuel maps, High Octane and Low Octane. It will always run on
the High Octane Map unless it senses a problem.

The Fuel Maps have 3 components, the RPM scale, the Flow scale and the AFR
correction Map itself. All Maps are 16x16, giving 256 load points. The
scales must match the sides of the map so are 16 entries each.

Flow Scale a.k.a TP Scale:
(labelled 'Boost' in Rom Edit)
The Flow scale (as I call it) gives a basic injector pulsewidth(K constant)
multiplyer, depending on the load sensed by the AFM.

RPM Scale:
This scale determines what RPM each axis of the AFR correction map is
plotted against. Stock is from 500 rpm to 6800 rpm, in (mostly) 400 rpm
increments.

AFR Correction Map:
This is the business end of tuning. Full mapping of your AFRs across load
and RPM.

Putting it all together:
Ok, go through a quick example to see how all the above works
together in determining an injectors pulsewidth for a given load and RPM.
For the example lets suppose:

K constant = 0.125 Milliseconds
AFM reading = 5 Volts
RPM = 6800.

1) ECU reads AFM - 5v.
2) 5v is "filtered" by the VQ Map - 100% load.
3) Flow scale at 100% load is consulted (column 16) = 83.
4) Basic Pulsewidth = K constant x Flow scale
Basic Pulsewidth = 0.125 x 83
Basic Pulsewidth = 10.375ms
5) ECU consults RPM Scale,
6800 rpm corresponds with row 16 of the RPM scale.
(We have already calculated column 16 for the Flow scale.)
6) Entry in the AFR correction Map: row 16, col 16 = 1.6.
7) Injection Calculation = Basic Pulsewidth x AFR Correction
Injection Calculation = 10.375 x 1.6
Injection Calculation = 16.6ms


There you have it. In our imaginary ECU, at 5 volts on the AFM, 6800 rpm,
it will pulse the injectors for 16.6ms or around 95% duty cycle.

If you followed all that, then you're now prepared for the good stuff. The
next section will give you all the specifics about the above variables,
where and what the values are in the ROM image, how to interpret them into
meaningful values, and how to use them in tuning your ECU.

--

ECU Injection Calculation - Detailed Analysis

K Required Number: (Nice and simple, some unknowns though)
CA Rom Address: 3F80 - 3F81. 2x 8bit Values. Quanta: 00 B7 seems to equal
0.125ms(!)
SR Rom Address: 000A - 000B. 2x 8bit Values. Quanta: ? ms

As said before, the K required number is the basic injector pulsewidth. On
a stock CA18DET map it appears to be 0.125ms. For now that is all you need
to remember. You'll see how it fits in the "Putting it all together 2"
sections.

How do I know that the K Constant in a CA18DET (00 B7) = 0.125ms?
Well to be honest, I don't. I received this vital piece of info from a
Japanese CA tuner. Sceptical (as I am) I deconstructed all the maps on my
CA18DET to calculate Duty Cycle and AFR with the 0.125 ms value and it fits
perfectly. So, I'll continue with this assertion until I can be proven
wrong/right.


VQ Map: (This could take a while)
CA Rom Address: 3E18 - 3E74. 52 x 16bit Values. Resolution: 0.1Volt.
Quanta: 16bit Precision Quotient
SR Rom Address: 0700 - 077F. 64 x 16bit Values. Resolution: 0.8Volt.
Quanta: 16bit Precision Quotient

If you know nothing about AFMs, or Math, I might confuse you here. I've
made this as simple as I can, but if I confuse you, or you disagree, email
me. If you already know lots about AFMs, you could probably just skip to
the "* So how do I read a VQ Map? *" paragraph.

Where do I start. As I've stated before an AFM doesn't have a linear
response. If it did, we wouldn't need a VQ Map. Therefore we need a
mechanism that will convert this non-linear Voltage into a linear Quotient
(or percentage) of the AFM's maximum flow. Hrmm...

Voltage... Quotient... Map... VQ Map?

What do I mean by non-linear? Ok, lets say we have an ACME AFM, good for
about 500hp and 0-5v. At 0v we know its flowing 0hp worth of air. At 5v
its flowing about 500hp worth of air. But what about inbetween? If it was
linear, 1v might equal 100hp worth of air. So:

1v = 100hp
2v = 200hp
3v = 300hp
and so on.
So if you read 2.48v at the AFM you'd know you were flowing 248hp worth of air.
Old 02-27-2004, 02:50 PM
  #32  
Chebosto
350Z-holic
Premier Member
iTrader: (43)
 
Chebosto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Redondo Beach, CA
Posts: 10,681
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

But that would make this section far too easy to write. The response of the
AFM is non-linear in that, its voltage gradient decreases as the flow
increases. Gradient means 'rate of change'. In other words "it takes more
air flow to increase the voltage, as the air flow increases". I'll try and
explain a little clearer. Lets take our ACME AFM, and give it a non-linear
response.
0v = 0hp
1v = 25hp
2v = 75hp
3v = 175hp
4v = 300hp
5v = 500hp
So it takes
25hp worth of air to progress from 0-1v
50hp 1-2v
100hp 2-3v
125hp 3-4v
200hp 4-5v
thus "it takes more air flow to increase the voltage, as the air flow
increases"



Lets plot this little map out with some bad ascii art to further
demonstrate.
See how the marks are further spread out as you go right along the axis...

Vertical Scale is Voltage
Horizontal is Airflow

V 5 *
o 4 *
l 3 *
t 2 *
s 1 *
0 1 2 3 4 5

Air Flow

So if you read 2.48v at the AFM, how much air are you flowing now?
Somewhere between 75 and 175hp is all we really know! We could (linearly)
interpolate between 2v and 3v and calculate 123hp (2-3 = 1v, 75-175 =
100hp -> .48v = 48hp, 75hp + 48hp = 123hp)
But thats guess. Quite a big guess. And you don't want your ECU making big
guesses.

So what is the solution? An accurate VQ Map. See our little maps above
that say 1v = 25hp and so on? Well that is a crude VQ map. To make it
useful, we need more precision. Much more precision. The CA ECU's VQ Map
has 52 points, mapping the airflow at 0.1v intervals. The SR's has 64
points, mapping the airflow at 0.8v intervals.

Sounds simple? Well to make things harder, the VQ map doesn't (directly)
give you a hp reading. It gives you a quotient. Think of it as "Percentage
of Maximum Flow". If you know how to read a VQ Map, you could look at the
point for 2.48v, and say - the AFM is flowing 32% of its maximum at this
point. If you happened to know that your AFM was good for 500hp, then its
flowing about 160hp at 2.48v. Simple.

* So how do I read a VQ Map? *

This might be easiest to explain using ROM Editor. Go onto the VQ Map Tab
and you'll see a list of 52 or 64 numbers depending on what type of map
you're looking at. If you look at a lot of different cars VQ Maps, you
might notice that all the values range from 0 - 65535. 65535 just happens
to be the largest value possible with 16 bit unsigned integers. This is
handy to know, as the VQ map uses 16 bit unsigned integers to store it's val
ues. I still haven't told you how to read a VQ Map have I. I'm sorry that
you didn't find a tuning website written by someone more to the point, and
you are stuck reading mine, but eh, what're you gonna do? Ok - Take a value
in the VQ Map - any value. Divide it by 65535. What do you get? Well
that's your quotient. Multiply that by 100 and you've got your "Percentage
of Maximum Flow". At what AFM voltage is that % value for? Well if its on
a CA map, the first value is for 0.1v, the second for 0.2 v and so on. For
an SR (and most others) the first value is for 0.08v, the second for 0.16v
and so on...

Want an example? Yes? Well you'll have to wait till I give you one. But I
will put one here soon.


RPM Scale:
CA Rom Address: 3BD0 - 3BDF. 16 x 8 bit Values. Quanta: 50 rpm
SR Rom Address: 00E0 - 00EF. 16 x 8 bit Values. Quanta: 50 rpm

The Vertical Scale of the AFR Correction Map is RPM. The stock range is
500 - 6800 rpm. If you built a de-stroked screamer that revs to 12000 rpm
you might get a bit worried about what the ECU will do above 6800rpm.
Fortunately Nissan thought of this, and allows you to modify this scale and
specify the operating rev range of your motor.

The stock Nissan specified values are fine for me, as I have my redline set
at 7500rpm. Keeping them the same also means you don't have to recalibrate
the AFR Map, and extrapolate values for the new rev ranges.

If you do decide to make changes here, this is what you need to know. The
ROM image contains 16 values that makes up the scale. To decode these into
RPM simply multiply them by 50. Open a Map in ROM Editor, and modify some
of the RPM values - you'll notice they increment and decrement 50 rpm
intervals.


Flow Scale:
CA Rom Address: 3BC0 - 3BCF. 16 x 8 bit Values. Quanta: None -
Multiplication Factor
SR Rom Address: 00F0 - 00FF. 16 x 8 bit Values. Quanta: None -
Multiplication Factor

The Horizontal Scale of the AFR Correction Map is what I call Flow, and it
is important because its the primary load axis. You already know the AFM is
the primary load sensor, so it makes sense that these two are closely
linked. When the AFM is flowing close to minimum, the minimum values on
this scale are referenced, when the AFM is flowing close to maximum, the max
values are referenced.

But what are these values? Well they are a multiplier, that when applied to
the K Constant give a basic injector pulsewidth for a given airflow measured
by the AFM. Now the clever thing that the Nissan engineers did here, was to
set the injector pulsewidth to that required for a Stoich (14.7) AFR.

How could they do this? Well that's the beauty of AFMs. Air Fuel Ratio is
determined by Mass. An AFM will accurately determine the mass of air
entering the engine at any given instant. Now we just need the
corresponding mass of fuel to enter the engine to have our 14.7 AFR. Since
the Nissan engineers knew the flow rates of the injectors, they could then
calculate the required injector pulsewidth.

Using the Flow Scale to calculate basic pulsewidth will be covered in depth
in "Putting it all Together 2".

AFR Correction Map:
CA Rom Address: 3D00 - 3DFF. 256 x 8 bit Values. Quanta: None -
Multiplication Factor
SR Rom Address: 0100 - 01FF. 256 x 8 bit Values. Quanta: None -
Multiplication Factor

These maps are the business end of tuning. If you've read how the flow
scale works, you'd realise that it alone, is enough to calculate an injector
pulsewidth that will provide a 14.7 AFR at all loads measured by the AFM.
Thing is, we don't want a Stoich AFR at all loads and RPMs. Nice and rich
at high loads/rpms to keep the engine together, and lean it out somewhat at
light loads for good cruising economy and throttle response.

To do this the AFR correction map will provide a(nother) multiplyer that is
applied to the basic pulsewidth, to give a final injector pulsewidth. Since
the basic pulsewidth provided by the flow scale is a known 14.7 AFR, this
multiplyer will also allow us to calculate the new 'corrected' AFR.

Lets say we wanted a Stoich AFR at idle (say 800rpm, at minimum load on the
map). The basic pulsewidth is already stoich, so to lets keep it the same
(Set the multiplyer to 1).

Want a Rich AFR? Make the Multiplyer greater than 1. Lets say bulk rich -
around 10:1. We'd want a multiplyer of 1.47 (14.7 / 10).

And Lean? You guessed it, Multiplyer of less than 1. Targetting an AFR of
16:1? Use a multiplyer of 0.92 (14.7 / 16).

Open up ROM Editor again and have a look at the Fuel Maps (hi/lo octane,
doesn't matter). Those numbers don't look anything like 1, or 1.47 or 0.92,
do they? So how do we read them? I'm glad you asked. Here's the little
forula you need.

if DATA > 128 then MULTIPLYER = (DATA - 64 / 128)
else
MULTIPLYER = (DATA + 128 / 128)

This formula dictates the range of multiplyers we have access to, ie:
0 = 1x (0 + 128 / 128)
128 = 2x (128 + 128 / 128)
&
129 = 0.5x (129 - 64 / 128)
255 = 1.5x (255 - 64 / 128)

Thus we can target AFR of 7.35:1 (2x) through to 29.4:1 (0.5x) which should
be enough for anyone.

Putting it all Together Part 2:
Lets repeat the exercise we completed the first time around, but this time
use the raw data, and formula we now know. Lets use it on a stock CA18DET
Map

So - Air Flow Meter is reading 4.9 Volts & Car is revving to 6800rpm.
What Injector pulsewidth will the ECU use, and what is the target AFR.
For bonus points, what will the dutycycle of the injectors be?

Start - Determine Flow Quotient.
AFM is reading 4.9 volts. Check the Value of the VQ map at position 49
(0.1v resolution remember).
Divide it by 65535. What did you get? Ok, our AFM is measuring X% of it's
total flow.

Next - Read Flow Scale.
The Flow Scale has 16 columns. We need to know which column to read.
Multiply your Flow Quotient by 16 and round up. Ok, Column 16 on the Flow
Scale is 83

Next - Determine K Constant Pulsewidth.
I'm going to lay a new fomrula on here
Next - Determine Basic Injection Pulsewidth.
Basic Injection Pulsewidth = Flow Scale Multiplyer x K Constant

K Constant Pulsewidth = 00 B7 = 0.125ms.

Basic Injection Pulsewidth = 83 x

--

[UNDER CONSTRUCTION]

Tuning (or doing something useful with all the knowledge we have just
gained)


General Retune:

Rev Limits & Speed Limits: (Good starting point)

Changing Injectors: (K Constant is your friend)

To work out the pulsewidth of a different K constant do the following.
Pulsewidth = K Constant * 0.125 / 183 (183 is B7 in Decimal).

Changing AFMs: (K Constant or Flow Scale - the choice is yours.)


**** END ****
Old 02-27-2004, 02:57 PM
  #33  
Chebosto
350Z-holic
Premier Member
iTrader: (43)
 
Chebosto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Redondo Beach, CA
Posts: 10,681
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

taken from:

http://www.sr20forum.com/showthread....threadid=25488

i've been searching this Engineering Tip Forum:
http://www.eng-tips.com/viewthread.c...PID=71&page=13



it might have a little more info than necessary.. but it does explain how to tune for this..

Last edited by Chebosto; 02-27-2004 at 02:59 PM.
Old 02-27-2004, 03:02 PM
  #34  
Chebosto
350Z-holic
Premier Member
iTrader: (43)
 
Chebosto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Redondo Beach, CA
Posts: 10,681
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Here is the thread i posted up at Eng-Tips.com

we'll see what type of replies we can get from ppl in industry.


i'm probably just going to go with an aftermarket MAF sensor.. :\


http://www.eng-tips.com/viewthread.c...SPID=71&page=1
Old 02-27-2004, 03:20 PM
  #35  
Mr B
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Mr B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Just another guy...
Posts: 1,654
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Instead of explaining everything, fix it Cheston. I'm waiting... j/k
Old 02-27-2004, 04:16 PM
  #36  
350Now
Registered User
 
350Now's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: So Cal
Posts: 1,368
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

With an aftermaket MAF sensor that can handle more load you will need to create a map so that ecu will know how to translate correct?

P.S. Off Topic but since Skidazzle started this thread. Congrats on being in the April Issue of Modified Magazine. We now return to our regular programming how do we fix this???

Last edited by 350Now; 02-27-2004 at 04:19 PM.
Old 02-27-2004, 05:21 PM
  #37  
Z1 Performance
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (564)
 
Z1 Performance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 19,266
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Do not go the diode route..its chees to say the least.

Ditch the MAF altogether...there are several options out there (one of which we happen to offer, though ahve yet to try on the Z)
Old 02-28-2004, 12:01 AM
  #38  
12SecZ
Registered User
 
12SecZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: NOR - CAL
Posts: 4,686
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I was reading Import Tuner tonight at work and the 1995 TT Supra did away with the MAF with a stand alone because of this similar issue, they used AEM. They gained 40 foot of TQ in their power pages, the whole issue was about tuning Imports and piggy backs Vs. Reflash and stand alones. Good Mag, it's a couple months old I am behind on my reading.

It seems though at a glance that the reflashed cars at the ECM level are not expeirencing this limp mode. Thanks t32gzz for the description, I have never experienced that even at 11 PSI.

Spaz,
Max
ZED

Whatever Import Tuner did to their TT (they own it and feature it almost monthly) fixed this exact problem via tuning by "Commander" so I am sure the MAF hack or even replacement will work.
Old 02-28-2004, 08:44 AM
  #39  
MacGuru
Registered User
 
MacGuru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: NYC
Posts: 662
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Nice write up Cheston. Now my head is spinning from all these formulas! I now have a much better understanding of the whole thing. Keep up the great work. Thanks. -m
Old 02-28-2004, 03:13 PM
  #40  
azrael
Registered User
 
azrael's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: austin
Posts: 560
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by 12SecZ
It seems though at a glance that the reflashed cars at the ECM level are not expeirencing this limp mode. Thanks t32gzz for the description, I have never experienced that even at 11 PSI.
the supercharger doesn't reach full boost (or anywhere near it) until redline. This situation is for cars that max out the MAF before 4700 RPM. That will never happen on a centrifugal supercharger, unless you've got a huge (20+ pound, maybe?) pulley. The TS reflash doesn't have anything to do with it.


Quick Reply: Bad news for the big boosters...!



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:38 PM.