Notices
Forced Induction Turbochargers and Superchargers..Got Boost?

Changing Fuel System to a return style

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 10, 2004 | 09:24 AM
  #41  
Steve@Evolution's Avatar
Steve@Evolution
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
From: Virginia
Default

Originally posted by SR20DEN
Underterminable number? Did you not see the inline FPR? Everything is coltrolled and the FP is set to the desired amount. However that diagram is for a passive booster pump that would come on only when needed. An active setup for FI would replace the FPR with a FMU.
Your inline FPR is dumping excess fuel back into the main feed line which carries a 52psi pressure. That excess fuel is pressurized just as much as what the second pump is pumping. You are not scavanging anything but increasing a unknown amount of fuel pressure in your completely fuel system. Like I said, yes, you got your fuel rised. And No, it is not safe.
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2004 | 09:56 AM
  #42  
SR20DEN's Avatar
SR20DEN
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
From: Charlotte, NC
Default

The system will run and maintain any set amount of fuel pressure between 52psi to the fuel pump max. And it will quickly return to the base FP when the pump is either shutdown of the FPR resets to base. The system can even be used to maintain the feed presure or maintain a lower pressure if the in tank pump can keep up with it's intended pressure supply.

If there is anything wrong with the Nissan fuel system for high power output it would be the quick connect to the fuel tank.
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2004 | 04:39 PM
  #43  
whosdady's Avatar
whosdady
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 663
Likes: 0
From: St. Louis, MO
Default

Last night I recieved a few PM's about plugging the stock FPR.

For those of you that don't know my car has been at Crawfords for several weeks getting a new makeover.

Doug told me today he plugged the stock fpr by 1) pull fpr out of tank 2) epoxy the holes closed 3) let it dry and 4) stick it back in the tank. For those concerned, the epoxy is not effected by gas. (Doug has obviously has done this before). He told me a secret about the o ring too. He said that it will not increase in size unless you get gas on it.

Quick question, it seems like the stock idle fuel pressure is 50 psi. The consensus also seems that the fuel pressure should increase 1psi fuel per 1psi boost. So in my case at 10psi during wot, the fuel pressure should be 60psi?
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2004 | 01:51 PM
  #44  
Sharif@Forged's Avatar
Sharif@Forged
Sponsor
Forged Performance
iTrader: (92)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 13,733
Likes: 1
From: Marietta, GA
Default

Originally posted by whosdady

Quick question, it seems like the stock idle fuel pressure is 50 psi. The consensus also seems that the fuel pressure should increase 1psi fuel per 1psi boost. So in my case at 10psi during wot, the fuel pressure should be 60psi?

Yes this is correct. It took me a while to understand why it was REALLY necessary to increase FP as boost increases. Turns out the fuel pressure is effected and dependant on the positive pressure that the turbo is producing in the manifold and air intake track. Without a FP raiser, you actually have less TRUE fuel pressure at the end of the injector as it sprays into the intake track. So if your guage reads 60psi, and you are boosting 10psi, your effective fuel pressure is really 50psi.
Thats why the FPR raiser compensates for that by 1:1

As stated, the ECU doesnt have a fuel pressure sensor. The in tank FPR is a tiny POS integrated into the plastic Fuel Pump assembly. There is no way it can dump enough fuel at the levels necessary when running a Walbro 255. And even if it could, you should still ditch it for an external raising rate FPR.


SR20, I understand your diagram now..I think. But seems like a very risky band-aid. You are creating a continues loop of high pressure fuel running back to the FPR. Definatley not even close to text-book F/I fuel management.

A better, and almost as easy solution is this:

1) Install Walbro 255
2) Plug Stock FPR
3) Cut fuel line before the fuel rail.
4) Install Aeromotive A-1000 FPR.
5) Return line back to the tank, and drill small hole in the plastic FP assembly for the return.

Now, obvously not as robust or expensive as ACP's plan...but a much safer alternative to the solution you proposed.
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2004 | 10:52 PM
  #45  
Steve@Evolution's Avatar
Steve@Evolution
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
From: Virginia
Default

Originally posted by gq_626
[B]As stated, the ECU doesnt have a fuel pressure sensor. [B]
That answered my question. The Ecu from Honda K series motor goes bezark if the fuel pressure is alittle higher or lower. It also has a returnless fuel system.
I can understand why it's sensitive to change of fuel pressure because with no fuel return and to get a ultra clean emission the fueling must be precisely accurate. If the fuel pressure changes, reprogrammed fueling would be thrown off.
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2004 | 12:46 AM
  #46  
Sharif@Forged's Avatar
Sharif@Forged
Sponsor
Forged Performance
iTrader: (92)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 13,733
Likes: 1
From: Marietta, GA
Default

Evo, you are exactly correct.

The returnless system was born out of ever-more-stringent emmissions regulations. With a return system there is fear that the warm fuel will return towards the tank and possiblity release some vapors into the atmosphere. Instead, with our returnless system, the vapors would return to the intake manifold straight away, or be routed from the evap canister back to the intake manifold.

Damned the EPA!! and CARB!!
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2004 | 06:38 AM
  #47  
SR20DEN's Avatar
SR20DEN
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
From: Charlotte, NC
Default

I have the Walbro 255HP and have never had any problems with the stock FPR. The pressure remains constant. Even when I used that booster system the stock FPR had NO problems quickly venting the excess line pressure back into the fuel tank when the pump was shut off. I monitored this with a Autometer electric full sweep fuel pressure gauge.


It seems to me that the returnless system was designed also as a cost reduction factor because of it's fewer parts. Also, since no fuel is returned to the tank the fuel always remains much cooler which is better for consistancy in power levels and avoiding detonation.

Last edited by SR20DEN; Jun 12, 2004 at 06:40 AM.
Reply
Old Jun 13, 2004 | 10:41 AM
  #48  
ACP's Avatar
ACP
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 405
Likes: 0
From: Naples, FL
Default update

installed my return line.
Here is the bulkhead fitting, on the top of the driveside fuel assembly




Put a hose on the end of the fitting, so it goes into the tank


Picture of it back together
*note, I didn't have to use the 180 degree fitting, I only did so because I had it. It didn't work on the Aeromotive like I thought, as it would turn around and hit it.


And the MagnaFuel fitting, with the lines going to towards the fuel rails, waiting on my adaptors

Reply
Old Jun 13, 2004 | 08:59 PM
  #49  
Sharif@Forged's Avatar
Sharif@Forged
Sponsor
Forged Performance
iTrader: (92)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 13,733
Likes: 1
From: Marietta, GA
Default

wonderful!
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2004 | 09:29 AM
  #50  
SKiDaZZLe's Avatar
SKiDaZZLe
Charter Member #34
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,228
Likes: 0
From: -
Default

tim: good job getting it from paper to the real application!
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2004 | 11:46 AM
  #51  
ACP's Avatar
ACP
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 405
Likes: 0
From: Naples, FL
Default

Originally posted by SKiDaZZLe
tim: good job getting it from paper to the real application!
couldn't of done it without your help buddy!
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2004 | 11:52 AM
  #52  
KShep's Avatar
KShep
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,385
Likes: 0
From: Georgia
Default

Impressive.
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2004 | 03:06 PM
  #53  
mprowe350's Avatar
mprowe350
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
From: North Carolina
Default

ACP,
Any good word on the FPR plug? I haven't been reading your posts lately, sorry for my lazyness.
Thanks,
MIKE
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2004 | 03:12 PM
  #54  
ACP's Avatar
ACP
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 405
Likes: 0
From: Naples, FL
Default

Originally posted by mprowe350
ACP,
Any good word on the FPR plug? I haven't been reading your posts lately, sorry for my lazyness.
Thanks,
MIKE
No change on that.....

page 2 of this thread
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2004 | 03:17 PM
  #55  
mprowe350's Avatar
mprowe350
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
From: North Carolina
Default

Originally posted by ACP
No change on that.....

page 2 of this thread
Thanks ACP. Your design is looking awesome. Did you mention that this could possibly be sold as a package deal one dayl?
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2004 | 12:42 PM
  #56  
ACP's Avatar
ACP
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 405
Likes: 0
From: Naples, FL
Default

Here is the compressed hard line fitting



Installed on the car



Heatsheild I installed to protect the fuel lines.


My return line, run above the driveshaft, very secure
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2004 | 03:18 PM
  #57  
Sharif@Forged's Avatar
Sharif@Forged
Sponsor
Forged Performance
iTrader: (92)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 13,733
Likes: 1
From: Marietta, GA
Default

I like the heat shield and location of running the return line. You are really paying great attention to all the details.

good work!
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2004 | 03:08 AM
  #58  
ACP's Avatar
ACP
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 405
Likes: 0
From: Naples, FL
Default

Originally posted by gq_626
I like the heat shield and location of running the return line. You are really paying great attention to all the details.

good work!
Thanks gg

Do you recognize the heat sheild piece ?
You probably have it in your garage..
hehe
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2004 | 11:03 AM
  #59  
Sharif@Forged's Avatar
Sharif@Forged
Sponsor
Forged Performance
iTrader: (92)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 13,733
Likes: 1
From: Marietta, GA
Default

hmm...I'll have to search my inventory...cant really think of where that part came from. Oh...did it have something to do with the stock exhuast system! Oh yes...I think it did! But too bad I tossed it!

So how is the install coming? Have all of your fitings and adaptors come together?
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2004 | 08:17 PM
  #60  
g350c6mt's Avatar
g350c6mt
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
From: Cali
Default

Originally posted by ACP
thanks gg

The stock configuration is only one fuel line feed to the passengerside fuel rail.
The fuel rails are connected in the back, and that is how the driveside gets fuel.

What I am doing, so putting in 2 feeds, one on the driveside, and one on the passengerside fuel rails (remove the stock dampers).
Then I have those 2 feeds coming out of the front of the fuel rails (shown above)
This will go into the fuel pressure regulator, and then one return back to the tank.

This gives me rock solid fuel pressure, and control over the amount.
This is needed for me to raise boost higher.

Soon as the fuel rail adaptors I am having made up are complete, I can finish this fuel upgrade, and go in to get dyno tuned.

Those that are interested.
The fuel rail adaptors I am having made up are a direct bolt on to the stock fuel rails.
This can be used for what I am doing above (you'll need 2) or which will probably be more common, just get one, and do way with the stock damper, and connect your fittings directly to the adaptors (AN -6)

I was wondering where you got the piece that goes in the fuel rail so I can try to make my own as well. I'm trying to set up my fuel system like yours w/ the 2 feeds and coming out the front into the fpr and one return. This is the only missing piece
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:30 PM.